# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

August  2018, 15(4): 883-904. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018040

## Influence of Allee effect in prey populations on the dynamics of two-prey-one-predator model

 1 Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar-800005, India 2 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh-208016, India 3 Department of Physics and Mathematics, Aoyama Gakuin University, Kanagawa, Japan

* Corresponding authorr: malayb@iitk.ac.in.

Received  June 26, 2017 Accepted  November 25, 2017 Published  March 2018

One of the important ecological challenges is to capture the complex dynamics and understand the underlying regulating ecological factors. Allee effect is one of the important factors in ecology and taking it into account can cause significant changes to the system dynamics. In this work we consider a two prey-one predator model where the growth of both the prey population is subjected to Allee effect, and the predator is generalist as it survives on both the prey populations. We analyze the role of Allee effect on the dynamics of the system, knowing the dynamics of the model without Allee effect. Interestingly we have observed through a comprehensive bifurcation study that incorporation of Allee effect enriches the local as well as the global dynamics of the system. Specially after a certain threshold value of the Allee effect, it has a very significant effect on the chaotic dynamics of the system. In course of the bifurcation analysis we have explored all possible bifurcations such as the existence of transcritical bifurcation, saddle-node bifurcation, Hopf-bifurcation, Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation and Bautin bifurcation and period-doubling route to chaos respectively.

Citation: Moitri Sen, Malay Banerjee, Yasuhiro Takeuchi. Influence of Allee effect in prey populations on the dynamics of two-prey-one-predator model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (4) : 883-904. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018040
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Positions of the nullclines projected on the xy-plane showing the feasibility of $E_5$.
Schematic bifurcation diagram for the model (5) in $\alpha_1\, \alpha_2$-parametric space. Transcritical bifurcation curves (violet and magenta), saddle-node bifurcation curve(s) (black, blue and cyan), Hopf-bifurcation curve (yellow and green) and the red curve for the first period doubling bifurcation for limit cycle divide the parametric space into seventeen regions ($R_1\, \rightarrow\, R_{17}$). Point marked in black colour is Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point, point of tangency of transcritical bifurcation curve for $E_*$ and the saddle node bifurcation curve for $E_5$ is marked with a blue dot, and the point of tangency transcritical bifurcation curve and the saddle node bifurcation curve for $E_*$ is marked with a red dot. Stability properties of various equilibria with different parametric regions are summarized at Table-1.
Schematic bifurcation diagram for the model (5) in $\alpha_1\, \alpha_2$-parametric space. Transcritical bifurcation curves (violet and magenta), saddle-node bifurcation curve(s) (black, blue and cyan), Hopf-bifurcation curve (yellow and green) and the red curve for the first period doubling bifurcation for limit cycle divide the parametric space into sixteen regions ($R_1\, \rightarrow\, R_{16}$) and three more regions $R_{4A}, \, R_{5A}\, R_{6A}$. Point marked in black colour is Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation point, point of tangency of transcritical bifurcation curve for $E_*$ and the saddle node bifurcation curve for $E_5$ are marked with a blue dot and the point of tangency transcritical bifurcation curve and the saddle node bifurcation curve for $E_*$ is marked with a red dot. Stability properties of various equilibria with different parametric regions are summarized at Table-1.
respectively. Continuous line represents stability of concerned equilibrium point when $\alpha_1$ increases. $E_{2*}$ loses stability through Hopf-bifurcation at $\alpha_1\equiv \alpha_{1H} = 0.0083$, first period doubling occurs at $\alpha_1 = 0.01185$, chaotic dynamics is observed for $\alpha_1\in[0.0125, 0.0135]$.">Figure 3.  Bifurcation diagram with respect to the parameter $\alpha_1$, other parameter values are $\alpha = 1, \alpha_2 = 0.01, \beta = 1.5, \beta_1 = 2, \beta_2 = 2, \beta_3 = 1, \gamma = 1, d = 0.5, \mu = 1, \epsilon = 5$. $\alpha_1\in[0, 0.0082], \, [0.0083, 0.0118]$ and $[0.0119, 0.0125]$ correspond to regions $R_4\, R_5$ and $R_6$ respectively. $x$-components of $E_0, E_3, E_5, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ are marked in blue, green, red, magenta, black colours in Fig 2 respectively. Continuous line represents stability of concerned equilibrium point when $\alpha_1$ increases. $E_{2*}$ loses stability through Hopf-bifurcation at $\alpha_1\equiv \alpha_{1H} = 0.0083$, first period doubling occurs at $\alpha_1 = 0.01185$, chaotic dynamics is observed for $\alpha_1\in[0.0125, 0.0135]$.
Peak-adding bifurcation: successive peaks appear as the supplementary local maxima and minima occur in (c), (d) and (e) for $\alpha_1=0.0121,0.0122$ and 0.0123 respectively.
. Continuous line represents stability of concerned equilibrium point when $\alpha_2$ decreases. $E_{2*}$ loses stability through Hopf-bifurcation at $\alpha_2\equiv \alpha_{2h} = 0.0642$, first period doubling occurs at $\alpha_2 = 0.0577$, chaotic dynamics is observed for $\alpha_2\in[0.05423, 0.056]$.">Figure 6.  Bifurcation diagram with respect to the parameter $\alpha_2$, other parameter values are $\alpha = 1, \alpha_1 = 0.005, \beta = 1.5, \beta_1 = 2, \beta_2 = 2, \beta_3 = 1, \gamma = 1, d = 0.5, \mu = 1, \epsilon = 10$. $\alpha_2\in[0.05423, 0.056], \, [0.056, 0.0642]$ and $[0.0643, 0.07]$ correspond to regions $R_4\, R_5$ and $R_6$ respectively. $x$-components of $E_0, E_3, E_5, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ are marked in blue, green, red, magenta, black colours respectively Fig 5. Continuous line represents stability of concerned equilibrium point when $\alpha_2$ decreases. $E_{2*}$ loses stability through Hopf-bifurcation at $\alpha_2\equiv \alpha_{2h} = 0.0642$, first period doubling occurs at $\alpha_2 = 0.0577$, chaotic dynamics is observed for $\alpha_2\in[0.05423, 0.056]$.
Summary of existence and stability conditions for the equilibria of (5).
 Equilibrium Existence Stability $\displaystyle E_0(0, 0, 0)$ Always LAS $\displaystyle E^+_1(+, 0, 0)$ $\beta_1\geq(1+\sqrt{\alpha_1})^2$ LAS if $x^+_1<\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$, Saddle point if $x^+_1>\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$ $\displaystyle E^-_1(+, 0, 0)$ $\beta_1\geq(1+\sqrt{\alpha_1})^2$ Saddle point with one dimensional unstable manifold if $x^-_1<\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$, Saddle point with two dimensional unstable manifolds $x^-_1>\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$ $\displaystyle E^+_2(0, +, 0)$ $\beta_2\geq(\sqrt{\gamma}+\sqrt{\alpha_2})^2$ LAS if $y^+_2<\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$, Saddle point if $y^+_2>\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$ $\displaystyle E^-_2(0, +, 0)$ $\beta_2\geq(\sqrt{\gamma}+\sqrt{\alpha_2})^2$ Saddle point with one dimensional unstable manifold if $y^-_2<\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$, Saddle point with two dimensional unstable manifolds if $y^-_2>\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$. $\displaystyle E_3(+, 0, +)$ $d\beta_1\beta_3\epsilon>(\beta_3+d\epsilon)(\beta_3+d\alpha_1\epsilon)$ LAS if $(x_3+\alpha_1)^2>\beta_1\alpha_1$ otherwise a saddle point $\displaystyle E_4(0, +, +)$ $d\beta_2\beta_3\mu>(\beta_3+d\mu\gamma)(\beta_3+d\alpha_2\mu)$ LAS if $(y_4+\alpha_2)^2>\beta_2\alpha_2$ otherwise a saddle point $\displaystyle E_5(+, +, 0)$ See proposition 6 See proposition 6 $\displaystyle E_*(+, +, +)$ See proposition 7 See proposition 7
 Equilibrium Existence Stability $\displaystyle E_0(0, 0, 0)$ Always LAS $\displaystyle E^+_1(+, 0, 0)$ $\beta_1\geq(1+\sqrt{\alpha_1})^2$ LAS if $x^+_1<\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$, Saddle point if $x^+_1>\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$ $\displaystyle E^-_1(+, 0, 0)$ $\beta_1\geq(1+\sqrt{\alpha_1})^2$ Saddle point with one dimensional unstable manifold if $x^-_1<\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$, Saddle point with two dimensional unstable manifolds $x^-_1>\frac{\beta_3}{d \epsilon}$ $\displaystyle E^+_2(0, +, 0)$ $\beta_2\geq(\sqrt{\gamma}+\sqrt{\alpha_2})^2$ LAS if $y^+_2<\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$, Saddle point if $y^+_2>\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$ $\displaystyle E^-_2(0, +, 0)$ $\beta_2\geq(\sqrt{\gamma}+\sqrt{\alpha_2})^2$ Saddle point with one dimensional unstable manifold if $y^-_2<\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$, Saddle point with two dimensional unstable manifolds if $y^-_2>\frac{\beta_3}{d \mu}$. $\displaystyle E_3(+, 0, +)$ $d\beta_1\beta_3\epsilon>(\beta_3+d\epsilon)(\beta_3+d\alpha_1\epsilon)$ LAS if $(x_3+\alpha_1)^2>\beta_1\alpha_1$ otherwise a saddle point $\displaystyle E_4(0, +, +)$ $d\beta_2\beta_3\mu>(\beta_3+d\mu\gamma)(\beta_3+d\alpha_2\mu)$ LAS if $(y_4+\alpha_2)^2>\beta_2\alpha_2$ otherwise a saddle point $\displaystyle E_5(+, +, 0)$ See proposition 6 See proposition 6 $\displaystyle E_*(+, +, +)$ See proposition 7 See proposition 7
Here $E_3$ undergoes a subcritical Hopf-bifurcation and $E_{2*}$ looses stability through supercritical Hopf-bifurcation. The Hopf bifurcating limit cycle around $E_{2*}$ disappears through chaos.
 Region Feasible Equilibria Attractors $\displaystyle R_1$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_2$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_3$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_4$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3, E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_5$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$, $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ & stable limit $E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_6$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_7$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_8$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_9$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{10}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{11}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{12}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_2^-$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{13}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{14}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{15}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_3$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{16}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{17}$ $E_0$ $E_0$
 Region Feasible Equilibria Attractors $\displaystyle R_1$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_2$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_3$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_4$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3, E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_5$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$, $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ & stable limit $E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_6$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{1*}, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_7$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_3$ $\displaystyle R_8$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2, E_{2*}$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_9$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{10}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{11}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_5^1, E_5^2$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{12}$ $E_0, E_2^+, E_2^-$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{13}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{14}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_2^+, E_2^-, E_3$ $E_0, E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{15}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-, E_3$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{16}$ $E_0, E_1^+, E_1^-$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{17}$ $E_0$ $E_0$
Here $E_3$ undergoes a subcritical Hopf-bifurcation and $E_{2*}$ looses stability through supercritical Hopf-bifurcation. The Hopf bifurcating limit cycle around $E_{2*}$ disappears through chaos.
 Region Feasible Equilibria Attractors $\displaystyle R_1$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_2$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_3$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_4$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3,E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_5$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$,$E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ stable limit cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_6$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$,$E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_7$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_8$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_9$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{10}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{11}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_2^-$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{12}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{13}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{14}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_3$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{15}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{16}$ $E_0$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{6A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{5A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$, $E_0,E_2^+$ stable limit $E_{1*},E_{2*}$ cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_{4A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_{2*}$
 Region Feasible Equilibria Attractors $\displaystyle R_1$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_2$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_3$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_4$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3,E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_5$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$,$E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ stable limit cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_6$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$,$E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_7$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_3$ $\displaystyle R_8$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_9$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{10}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_5^1,E_5^2$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{11}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_2^-$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{12}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{13}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{14}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_3$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{15}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{16}$ $E_0$ $E_0$ $\displaystyle R_{6A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+$ $\displaystyle R_{5A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$, $E_0,E_2^+$ stable limit $E_{1*},E_{2*}$ cycle around $E_{2*}$ $\displaystyle R_{4A}$ $E_0,E_1^+,E_1^-,E_2^+,E_2^-,E_3,E_5^1,E_5^2,E_{1*},E_{2*}$ $E_0,E_2^+,E_{2*}$
 [1] Na Min, Mingxin Wang. Hopf bifurcation and steady-state bifurcation for a Leslie-Gower prey-predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (2) : 1071-1099. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019045 [2] Na Min, Mingxin Wang. Dynamics of a diffusive prey-predator system with strong Allee effect growth rate and a protection zone for the prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (4) : 1721-1737. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018073 [3] Wenjie Ni, Mingxin Wang. Dynamical properties of a Leslie-Gower prey-predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (9) : 3409-3420. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017172 [4] Qizhen Xiao, Binxiang Dai. Heteroclinic bifurcation for a general predator-prey model with Allee effect and state feedback impulsive control strategy. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (5) : 1065-1081. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1065 [5] Miljana JovanoviĆ, Marija KrstiĆ. Extinction in stochastic predator-prey population model with Allee effect on prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2651-2667. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017129 [6] Rafael Ortega. Variations on Lyapunov's stability criterion and periodic prey-predator systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (6) : 3995-4008. doi: 10.3934/era.2021069 [7] Shanshan Chen, Jianshe Yu. Stability and bifurcation on predator-prey systems with nonlocal prey competition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (1) : 43-62. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018002 [8] Shanbing Li, Jianhua Wu. Effect of cross-diffusion in the diffusion prey-predator model with a protection zone. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (3) : 1539-1558. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017063 [9] Yuying Liu, Yuxiao Guo, Junjie Wei. Dynamics in a diffusive predator-prey system with stage structure and strong allee effect. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (2) : 883-910. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020040 [10] Yujing Gao, Bingtuan Li. Dynamics of a ratio-dependent predator-prey system with a strong Allee effect. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (9) : 2283-2313. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2283 [11] J. Gani, R. J. Swift. Prey-predator models with infected prey and predators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (11&12) : 5059-5066. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.5059 [12] Eduardo González-Olivares, Betsabé González-Yañez, Jaime Mena-Lorca, José D. Flores. Uniqueness of limit cycles and multiple attractors in a Gause-type predator-prey model with nonmonotonic functional response and Allee effect on prey. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (2) : 345-367. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.345 [13] Yiwen Tao, Jingli Ren. The stability and bifurcation of homogeneous diffusive predator–prey systems with spatio–temporal delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021038 [14] Isam Al-Darabsah, Xianhua Tang, Yuan Yuan. A prey-predator model with migrations and delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 737-761. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.737 [15] Zuolin Shen, Junjie Wei. Hopf bifurcation analysis in a diffusive predator-prey system with delay and surplus killing effect. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (3) : 693-715. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018031 [16] R. P. Gupta, Peeyush Chandra, Malay Banerjee. Dynamical complexity of a prey-predator model with nonlinear predator harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (2) : 423-443. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.423 [17] Malay Banerjee, Nayana Mukherjee, Vitaly Volpert. Prey-predator model with nonlocal and global consumption in the prey dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (8) : 2109-2120. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020180 [18] Yun Kang, Sourav Kumar Sasmal, Amiya Ranjan Bhowmick, Joydev Chattopadhyay. Dynamics of a predator-prey system with prey subject to Allee effects and disease. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (4) : 877-918. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.877 [19] Xiaoyuan Chang, Junjie Wei. Stability and Hopf bifurcation in a diffusive predator-prey system incorporating a prey refuge. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (4) : 979-996. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.979 [20] Ming Liu, Dongpo Hu, Fanwei Meng. Stability and bifurcation analysis in a delay-induced predator-prey model with Michaelis-Menten type predator harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (9) : 3197-3222. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020259

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313