# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

October  2018, 15(5): 1155-1164. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018052

## A stochastic model for water-vegetation systems and the effect of decreasing precipitation on semi-arid environments

 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 2 Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA 3 Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

* Corresponding author

Received  June 16, 2017 Accepted  March 16, 2018 Published  May 2018

Current climate change trends are affecting the magnitude and recurrence of extreme weather events. In particular, several semi-arid regions around the planet are confronting more intense and prolonged lack of precipitation, slowly transforming part of these regions into deserts in some cases. Although it is documented that a decreasing tendency in precipitation might induce earlier disappearance of vegetation, quantifying the relationship between decrease of precipitation and vegetation endurance remains a challenging task due to the inherent complexities involved in distinct scenarios. In this paper we present a model for precipitation-vegetation dynamics in semi-arid landscapes that can be used to explore numerically the impact of decreasing precipitation trends on appearance of desertification events. The model, a stochastic differential equation approximation derived from a Markov jump process, is used to generate extensive simulations that suggest a relationship between precipitation reduction and the desertification process, which might take several years in some instances.

Citation: Shannon Dixon, Nancy Huntly, Priscilla E. Greenwood, Luis F. Gordillo. A stochastic model for water-vegetation systems and the effect of decreasing precipitation on semi-arid environments. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1155-1164. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018052
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Simulations corresponding to the Markov jump process (left) and the diffusion approximation (right). For comparison purposes the paths in both panels were generated using the same parameters and the same scaled time.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/">Figure 2.  State averages of precipitation anomalies for 2000-2016 in California (inches year$^{-1}$). The averaged anomaly (difference from long term average) during that period is $\approx$ -2.07 (inches year$^{-1}$) (-52.58 mm year$^{-1}$). The precipitation increase expected from El Niño for the winter 2015-2016 was scarcely above the long term state average. Data/image provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/
Examples of how average time to desertification might be affected by a reduction in average annual precipitation. Parameters for trees were used in panel (a) and for grass in panel (b). The average of negative anomalies similar to that observed for the last years in California is around $\approx$ 50 mm year$^{-1}$. The model suggests that the sensitivity index $S_0\approx 2$, i.e. relative changes in the mean time to desertification are roughly twice the relative changes in average annual precipitation. For the simulations, $N = 500$ and the initial conditions were $\rho(0) = (0.1,0.1)$ (squares), $\rho(0) = (0.5,0.5)$ (stars) and $\rho(0) = (0.9,0.1)$ (triangles). Each time average was obtained from 50000 simulations. Panel (c) shows the histograms corresponding to the simulated times to desertification with an average annual precipitation of 200 and 250 mm year$^{-1}$ (for grass) on the left and right, respectively. The simulations used the same initial conditions $\rho(0) = (0.1,0.1)$.
Left: time to desertification for $A = 250$ (dashes) and $A = 200$ (dot-dashes) as function of the system capacity $N$. The sensitivity of the time to desertification from the annual precipitation was computed for $N = 10000$ showing to be the same as when $N = 500$, i.e. $\approx 2$. As $N$ increases both times to desertification also increase, but they get reduced dramatically as $N$ gets smaller. Right: Difference between the curves in the contiguous plot. Although the difference increases, the sensitivity of the time to desertification from the annual precipitation is apparently similar in relatively large systems.
Possible transition events with their associated jumps if the system is at state $(n,m)$, where $n$ and $m$ represent units of biomass and water, respectively.
 Event Transition Jump Jump rate Vegetation biomass loss $(n,m)\rightarrow(n-1,m)$ $(-1,0)$ $d$ Incoming water $(n,m)\rightarrow(n,m+1)$ $(0,1)$ $s$ Water evaporation $(n,m)\rightarrow(n,m-1)$ $(0,-1)$ $v$ Increase vegetation by $(n,m)\rightarrow(n+1,m-1)$ $(1,-1)$ $b$ water take up
 Event Transition Jump Jump rate Vegetation biomass loss $(n,m)\rightarrow(n-1,m)$ $(-1,0)$ $d$ Incoming water $(n,m)\rightarrow(n,m+1)$ $(0,1)$ $s$ Water evaporation $(n,m)\rightarrow(n,m-1)$ $(0,-1)$ $v$ Increase vegetation by $(n,m)\rightarrow(n+1,m-1)$ $(1,-1)$ $b$ water take up
Parameters for semi-arid landscapes, taken from [12].
 Parameter Definition Estimated values Units $R$ uptake rate of water 1.5(trees) - 100(grass) mm year$^{-1}$ (kg dry mass)$^{-2}$ $J$ yield of plant biomass 0.002(trees) - 0.003(grass) kg dry mass (mm)$^{-1}$ $M$ mortality rate 0.18(trees) - 1.8(grass) year$^{-1}$ $A$ precipitation 250 - 750 mm year$^{-1}$ $L$ evaporation rate 4 year$^{-1}$
 Parameter Definition Estimated values Units $R$ uptake rate of water 1.5(trees) - 100(grass) mm year$^{-1}$ (kg dry mass)$^{-2}$ $J$ yield of plant biomass 0.002(trees) - 0.003(grass) kg dry mass (mm)$^{-1}$ $M$ mortality rate 0.18(trees) - 1.8(grass) year$^{-1}$ $A$ precipitation 250 - 750 mm year$^{-1}$ $L$ evaporation rate 4 year$^{-1}$
 [1] Jonathan A. Sherratt, Alexios D. Synodinos. Vegetation patterns and desertification waves in semi-arid environments: Mathematical models based on local facilitation in plants. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (8) : 2815-2827. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2815 [2] Lan Jia, Liang Li. Stability and dynamic transition of vegetation model for flat arid terrains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021189 [3] Yukie Goto, Danielle Hilhorst, Ehud Meron, Roger Temam. Existence theorem for a model of dryland vegetation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 197-224. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.197 [4] Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model for the reformulated shallow water equations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 375-385. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.375 [5] Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model of shallow water equations with time-dependent variable resolution. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 355-364. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.355 [6] Tomás Caraballo, Renato Colucci, Xiaoying Han. Semi-Kolmogorov models for predation with indirect effects in random environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2129-2143. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016040 [7] Feng-Bin Wang, Xueying Wang. A general multipatch cholera model in periodic environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021105 [8] Yu Jin, Xiao-Qiang Zhao. The spatial dynamics of a Zebra mussel model in river environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (4) : 1991-2010. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020362 [9] Pao-Liu Chow. Stochastic PDE model for spatial population growth in random environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (1) : 55-65. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.55 [10] Harrison Watts, Arti Mishra, Dang H. Nguyen, Tran D. Tuong. Dynamics of a vector-host model under switching environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021029 [11] Marco Scianna, Luigi Preziosi, Katarina Wolf. A Cellular Potts model simulating cell migration on and in matrix environments. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (1) : 235-261. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.235 [12] Assaf Y. Kletter, Jost von Hardenberg, Ehud Meron. Ostwald ripening in dryland vegetation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 261-273. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.261 [13] Oliver Penrose, John W. Cahn. On the mathematical modelling of cellular (discontinuous) precipitation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (2) : 963-982. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017040 [14] David M. Ambrose, Jerry L. Bona, David P. Nicholls. Well-posedness of a model for water waves with viscosity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (4) : 1113-1137. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1113 [15] Yan'e Wang, Nana Tian, Hua Nie. Positive solution branches of two-species competition model in open advective environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (4) : 2273-2297. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021006 [16] Alan E. Lindsay, Michael J. Ward. An asymptotic analysis of the persistence threshold for the diffusive logistic model in spatial environments with localized patches. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (3) : 1139-1179. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1139 [17] Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Subhas Khajanchi, Yun Kang, Arvind Kumar Misra. A mathematical model to restore water quality in urban lakes using Phoslock. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3143-3175. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020223 [18] Hua Nie, Sze-Bi Hsu, Jianhua Wu. Coexistence solutions of a competition model with two species in a water column. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (8) : 2691-2714. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.2691 [19] Guangzhou Chen, Guijian Liu, Jiaquan Wang, Ruzhong Li. Identification of water quality model parameters using artificial bee colony algorithm. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 157-165. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.157 [20] Olivier Delestre, Arthur R. Ghigo, José-Maria Fullana, Pierre-Yves Lagrée. A shallow water with variable pressure model for blood flow simulation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (1) : 69-87. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.69

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313