Dynamics of delayed mosquitoes populations models with two different strategies of releasing sterile mosquitoes

Liming Cai; Shangbing Ai; Guihong Fan

doi:10.3934/mbe.2018054

Previous Article
A dynamic model of CT scans for quantifying doubling time of ground glass opacities using histogram analysis
MBE Home
This Issue
Next Article
Quantifying the impact of early-stage contact tracing on controlling Ebola diffusion

October 2018, 15(5): 1181-1202. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018054

Dynamics of delayed mosquitoes populations models with two different strategies of releasing sterile mosquitoes

Liming Cai ^1,, , Shangbing Ai ^2, and Guihong Fan ^3,

1.	School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 46400, China
2.	Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
3.	Department of Mathematics, Columbus State University, Columbus, Georgia 31907, USA

* Corresponding author: limingcai@amss.ac.cn

Received October 06, 2017 Revised April 14, 2018 Published May 2018

Fund Project: This research was supported partially the National Nature Science Foundation of China grant 11371305 and Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars XYNU.

To prevent the transmissions of mosquito-borne diseases (e.g., malaria, dengue fever), recent works have considered the problem of using the sterile insect technique to reduce or eradicate the wild mosquito population. It is important to consider how reproductive advantage of the wild mosquito population offsets the success of population replacement. In this work, we explore the interactive dynamics of the wild and sterile mosquitoes by incorporating the delay in terms of the growth stage of the wild mosquitoes. We analyze (both analytically and numerically) the role of time delay in two different ways of releasing sterile mosquitoes. Our results demonstrate that in the case of constant release rate, the delay does not affect the dynamics of the system and every solution of the system approaches to an equilibrium point; while in the case of the release rate proportional to the wild mosquito populations, the delay has a large effect on the dynamics of the system, namely, for some parameter ranges, when the delay is small, every solution of the system approaches to an equilibrium point; but as the delay increases, the solutions of the system exhibit oscillatory behavior via Hopf bifurcations. Numerical examples and bifurcation diagrams are also given to demonstrate rich dynamical features of the model in the latter release case.

Keywords: Mosquito population, stage-structure, stability, Hopf bifurcation.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92D25, 92B05, 34D20, 34A34.

Citation: Liming Cai, Shangbing Ai, Guihong Fan. Dynamics of delayed mosquitoes populations models with two different strategies of releasing sterile mosquitoes. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1181-1202. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018054

References:

[1]	R. Abdul-Ghani, H. F. Farag, A. F. Allam and A. A. Azazy, Measuring resistant-genotype transmission of malaria parasites: challenges and prospects, Parasitol Res., 113 (2014), 1481-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3789-9. Google Scholar
[2]	P. L. Alonso, G. Brown, M. Arevalo-Herrera, et al, A research agenda to underpin malaria eradication, PLoS Med., 8 (2011), e1000406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000406. Google Scholar
[3]	L. Alphey, M. Benedict, R. Bellini, G. G. Clark, D. A. Dame, M. W. Service and S. L. Dobson, Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: An analysis, Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis., 10 (2010), 295-311. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0014. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Arino, L. Wang and G. S. Wolkowicz, An alternative formulation for a delayed logistic equation, J. Theor. Biol., 241 (2006), 109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.007. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Q. Benedict and A. S. Robinson, The first releases of transgenic mosquitoes: An argument for the sterile insect technique, Trends Parasitol, 19 (2003), 349-355. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00144-2. Google Scholar
[6]	E. Beretta and Y. Kuang, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2002), 1144-1165. doi: 10.1137/S0036141000376086. Google Scholar
[7]	J. G. Breman, The ears of the hippopotamus: Manifestations, determinants, and estimates of the malaria burden, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 64 (2001), 1-11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.64.1. Google Scholar
[8]	W. G. Brogdon and J. C. McAllister, Insecticide resistance and vector control, J. Agromedicine, 6 (1999), 41-58. Google Scholar
[9]	L. Cai, S. Ai and J. Li, Dynamics of mosquitoes populations with different strategies for releasing sterile mosquitoes, SIAM, J. Appl. Math., 74 (2014), 1786-1809. doi: 10.1137/13094102X. Google Scholar
[10]	K. Cooke, P. van den Driessche and X. Zou, Interaction of maturation delay and nonlinear birth in population and epidemic models, J. Math. Biol., 39 (1999), 332-352. doi: 10.1007/s002850050194. Google Scholar
[11]	H. Diaz, A. A. Ramirez, A. Olarte and C. Clavijo, A model for the control of malaria using genetically modified vectors, J. Theor. Biol., 276 (2011), 57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.01.053. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Dieudonné, Foundations of Modern Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1960. Google Scholar
[13]	Y. Dumont and J. M. Tchuenche, Mathematical studies on the sterile insect technique for the Chikungunya disease and Aedes albopictus, J. Math. Biol., 65 (2012), 809-854. doi: 10.1007/s00285-011-0477-6. Google Scholar
[14]	V. A. Dyck, J. Hendrichs and A. S. Robinson, Sterile insect technique -principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management, Springer, The Netherlands, 2005. Google Scholar
[15]	C. Dye, Models for the population dynamics of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, J. Anim. Ecol., 53 (1984), 247-268. doi: 10.2307/4355. Google Scholar
[16]	L. Esteva and H. M. Yang, Assessing the effects of temperature and dengue virus load on dengue transmission, J. Biol. Syst., 23 (2015), 527-554. doi: 10.1142/S0218339015500278. Google Scholar
[17]	L. Esteva and H. M. Yang, Mathematical model to assess the control of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes by the sterile insect technique, Math. Biosci., 198 (2005), 132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.06.004. Google Scholar
[18]	J. E. Gentile, S. Rund and G. R Madey, Modelling sterile insect technique to control the population of Anopheles gambiae, Malaria J., 14 (2015), 92-103. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0587-5. Google Scholar
[19]	J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn Lunel, Introduction to Functional Differential Equation, Springer, New York, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7. Google Scholar
[20]	J. Ito, A. Ghosh, L. A. Moreira, E. A. Wilmmer and M. Jacobs-Lorena, Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malria parasite, Nature, 417 (2002), 452-455. Google Scholar
[21]	M. Jankovic and S. Petrovskii, Are time delays always destabilizing? Revisiting the role of time delays and the Allee effect, Theor Ecol., 7 (2014), 335-349. doi: 10.1007/s12080-014-0222-z. Google Scholar
[22]	E. F. Knipling, Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males, J. Econ. Entomol., 48 (1955), 459-462. Google Scholar
[23]	Y. Kuang, Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1993. Google Scholar
[24]	S. S. Lee, R. E. Baker, E. A. Gaffney and S. M. White, Modelling Aedes aegypti mosquito control via transgenic and sterile insect techniques: Endemics and emerging outbreaks, J. Theor. Biol., 331 (2013), 78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.04.014. Google Scholar
[25]	M. A. Lewis and P. van den Driessche, Waves of extinction from sterile insect release, Math. Biosci., 116 (1993), 221-247. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(93)90067-K. Google Scholar
[26]	J. Li, New revised simple models for interactive wild and sterile mosquito populations and their dynamics, J. Biol. Dyna., 11 (2017), 316-333. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2016.1216613. Google Scholar
[27]	J. Li, L. Cai and Y. Li, Stage-structured wild and sterile mosquito population models and their dynamics, J. Biol.Dyna., 11 (2017), 79-101. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2016.1159740. Google Scholar
[28]	J. Lu and J. Li, Dynamics of stage-structured discrete mosquito population, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 1 (2011), 53-67. Google Scholar
[29]	G. J. Lycett and F. C. Kafatos, Anti-malaria mosquitoes?, Nautre, 417 (2002), 387-388. Google Scholar
[30]	C. W. Morin and A. C. Comrie, Regional and seasonal response of a West Nile virus vector to climate change, PNAS, 110 (2013), 15620-15625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307135110. Google Scholar
[31]	W. W. Murdoch, C. J. Briggs and R. M. Nisbet, Consumer-resource dynamics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA, 2003. Google Scholar
[32]	H. K. Phuc, M. H. Andreasen, et al, Late-acting dominant lethal genetic systems and mosquito control, BMC. Biol., 5 (2007), 11–16. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-11. Google Scholar
[33]	E. P. Pliego, J. Vel$\acute{a}$zquez-Castro and A. F. Collar, Seasonality on the life cycle of Aedes aegypti mosquito and its statistical relation with dengue outbreaks, Appl. Math. Model., 50 (2017), 484-496. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.003. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Rafikov, L. Bevilacqua and A. P. Wyse, Optimal control strategy of malaria vector using genetically modified mosquitoes, J. Theor. Biol., 258 (2009), 418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.006. Google Scholar
[35]	S. J. Schreiber, Allee effect, extinctions, and chaotic transients in simple population models, Theor. Popul. Biol., 64 (2003), 201-209. doi: 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00072-8. Google Scholar
[36]	J. Smith, M. Amador and R. Barrera, Seasonal and habitat effects on dengue and West Nile Virus Vectors in San Juan, Puerto Rico, J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc., 25 (2009), 38-46. doi: 10.2987/08-5782.1. Google Scholar
[37]	H. Townson, SIT for African malaria vectors: Epilogue, Malar. J., 8 (2009), S10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S2-S10. Google Scholar
[38]	WHO, 10 facts on malaria, http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/malaria/en/. Google Scholar
[39]	J. Wu, H. R. Thieme, Y. Lou and G. Fan, Stability and persistence in ODE models for populations with many stages, Math. Biosc. Eng., 12 (2015), 661-686. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.661. Google Scholar
[40]	B. Zheng, M. Tang and J. Yu, Modeling Wolbachia spread in mosquitoes through delay differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 74 (2014), 743-770. doi: 10.1137/13093354X. Google Scholar
[41]	B. Zheng, M. Tang, J. Yu and J. Qiu, Wolbachia spreading dynamics in mosquitoes with imperfect maternal transmission, J. Math. Biol., 76 (2018), 235-263. doi: 10.1007/s00285-017-1142-5. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	R. Abdul-Ghani, H. F. Farag, A. F. Allam and A. A. Azazy, Measuring resistant-genotype transmission of malaria parasites: challenges and prospects, Parasitol Res., 113 (2014), 1481-1487. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3789-9. Google Scholar
[2]	P. L. Alonso, G. Brown, M. Arevalo-Herrera, et al, A research agenda to underpin malaria eradication, PLoS Med., 8 (2011), e1000406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000406. Google Scholar
[3]	L. Alphey, M. Benedict, R. Bellini, G. G. Clark, D. A. Dame, M. W. Service and S. L. Dobson, Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: An analysis, Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis., 10 (2010), 295-311. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0014. Google Scholar
[4]	J. Arino, L. Wang and G. S. Wolkowicz, An alternative formulation for a delayed logistic equation, J. Theor. Biol., 241 (2006), 109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.007. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Q. Benedict and A. S. Robinson, The first releases of transgenic mosquitoes: An argument for the sterile insect technique, Trends Parasitol, 19 (2003), 349-355. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00144-2. Google Scholar
[6]	E. Beretta and Y. Kuang, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2002), 1144-1165. doi: 10.1137/S0036141000376086. Google Scholar
[7]	J. G. Breman, The ears of the hippopotamus: Manifestations, determinants, and estimates of the malaria burden, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 64 (2001), 1-11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.64.1. Google Scholar
[8]	W. G. Brogdon and J. C. McAllister, Insecticide resistance and vector control, J. Agromedicine, 6 (1999), 41-58. Google Scholar
[9]	L. Cai, S. Ai and J. Li, Dynamics of mosquitoes populations with different strategies for releasing sterile mosquitoes, SIAM, J. Appl. Math., 74 (2014), 1786-1809. doi: 10.1137/13094102X. Google Scholar
[10]	K. Cooke, P. van den Driessche and X. Zou, Interaction of maturation delay and nonlinear birth in population and epidemic models, J. Math. Biol., 39 (1999), 332-352. doi: 10.1007/s002850050194. Google Scholar
[11]	H. Diaz, A. A. Ramirez, A. Olarte and C. Clavijo, A model for the control of malaria using genetically modified vectors, J. Theor. Biol., 276 (2011), 57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.01.053. Google Scholar
[12]	J. Dieudonné, Foundations of Modern Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1960. Google Scholar
[13]	Y. Dumont and J. M. Tchuenche, Mathematical studies on the sterile insect technique for the Chikungunya disease and Aedes albopictus, J. Math. Biol., 65 (2012), 809-854. doi: 10.1007/s00285-011-0477-6. Google Scholar
[14]	V. A. Dyck, J. Hendrichs and A. S. Robinson, Sterile insect technique -principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management, Springer, The Netherlands, 2005. Google Scholar
[15]	C. Dye, Models for the population dynamics of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, J. Anim. Ecol., 53 (1984), 247-268. doi: 10.2307/4355. Google Scholar
[16]	L. Esteva and H. M. Yang, Assessing the effects of temperature and dengue virus load on dengue transmission, J. Biol. Syst., 23 (2015), 527-554. doi: 10.1142/S0218339015500278. Google Scholar
[17]	L. Esteva and H. M. Yang, Mathematical model to assess the control of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes by the sterile insect technique, Math. Biosci., 198 (2005), 132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.06.004. Google Scholar
[18]	J. E. Gentile, S. Rund and G. R Madey, Modelling sterile insect technique to control the population of Anopheles gambiae, Malaria J., 14 (2015), 92-103. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0587-5. Google Scholar
[19]	J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn Lunel, Introduction to Functional Differential Equation, Springer, New York, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7. Google Scholar
[20]	J. Ito, A. Ghosh, L. A. Moreira, E. A. Wilmmer and M. Jacobs-Lorena, Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malria parasite, Nature, 417 (2002), 452-455. Google Scholar
[21]	M. Jankovic and S. Petrovskii, Are time delays always destabilizing? Revisiting the role of time delays and the Allee effect, Theor Ecol., 7 (2014), 335-349. doi: 10.1007/s12080-014-0222-z. Google Scholar
[22]	E. F. Knipling, Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males, J. Econ. Entomol., 48 (1955), 459-462. Google Scholar
[23]	Y. Kuang, Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1993. Google Scholar
[24]	S. S. Lee, R. E. Baker, E. A. Gaffney and S. M. White, Modelling Aedes aegypti mosquito control via transgenic and sterile insect techniques: Endemics and emerging outbreaks, J. Theor. Biol., 331 (2013), 78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.04.014. Google Scholar
[25]	M. A. Lewis and P. van den Driessche, Waves of extinction from sterile insect release, Math. Biosci., 116 (1993), 221-247. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(93)90067-K. Google Scholar
[26]	J. Li, New revised simple models for interactive wild and sterile mosquito populations and their dynamics, J. Biol. Dyna., 11 (2017), 316-333. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2016.1216613. Google Scholar
[27]	J. Li, L. Cai and Y. Li, Stage-structured wild and sterile mosquito population models and their dynamics, J. Biol.Dyna., 11 (2017), 79-101. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2016.1159740. Google Scholar
[28]	J. Lu and J. Li, Dynamics of stage-structured discrete mosquito population, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 1 (2011), 53-67. Google Scholar
[29]	G. J. Lycett and F. C. Kafatos, Anti-malaria mosquitoes?, Nautre, 417 (2002), 387-388. Google Scholar
[30]	C. W. Morin and A. C. Comrie, Regional and seasonal response of a West Nile virus vector to climate change, PNAS, 110 (2013), 15620-15625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307135110. Google Scholar
[31]	W. W. Murdoch, C. J. Briggs and R. M. Nisbet, Consumer-resource dynamics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA, 2003. Google Scholar
[32]	H. K. Phuc, M. H. Andreasen, et al, Late-acting dominant lethal genetic systems and mosquito control, BMC. Biol., 5 (2007), 11–16. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-11. Google Scholar
[33]	E. P. Pliego, J. Vel$\acute{a}$zquez-Castro and A. F. Collar, Seasonality on the life cycle of Aedes aegypti mosquito and its statistical relation with dengue outbreaks, Appl. Math. Model., 50 (2017), 484-496. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.003. Google Scholar
[34]	M. Rafikov, L. Bevilacqua and A. P. Wyse, Optimal control strategy of malaria vector using genetically modified mosquitoes, J. Theor. Biol., 258 (2009), 418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.006. Google Scholar
[35]	S. J. Schreiber, Allee effect, extinctions, and chaotic transients in simple population models, Theor. Popul. Biol., 64 (2003), 201-209. doi: 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00072-8. Google Scholar
[36]	J. Smith, M. Amador and R. Barrera, Seasonal and habitat effects on dengue and West Nile Virus Vectors in San Juan, Puerto Rico, J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc., 25 (2009), 38-46. doi: 10.2987/08-5782.1. Google Scholar
[37]	H. Townson, SIT for African malaria vectors: Epilogue, Malar. J., 8 (2009), S10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S2-S10. Google Scholar
[38]	WHO, 10 facts on malaria, http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/malaria/en/. Google Scholar
[39]	J. Wu, H. R. Thieme, Y. Lou and G. Fan, Stability and persistence in ODE models for populations with many stages, Math. Biosc. Eng., 12 (2015), 661-686. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.661. Google Scholar
[40]	B. Zheng, M. Tang and J. Yu, Modeling Wolbachia spread in mosquitoes through delay differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 74 (2014), 743-770. doi: 10.1137/13093354X. Google Scholar
[41]	B. Zheng, M. Tang, J. Yu and J. Qiu, Wolbachia spreading dynamics in mosquitoes with imperfect maternal transmission, J. Math. Biol., 76 (2018), 235-263. doi: 10.1007/s00285-017-1142-5. Google Scholar

Figure 1. Bistable phenomena still occur in (6). Here, parameter values $a_0 = 10, \mu_0 = 0.1, \mu_1 = 0.5, \mu_2 = 0.4, $$b = 21, \xi_1 = 0.5, \xi_2 = 0.4, \tau = 0.2$. For $b = 21 < b_0 = 21.93$, there exists three nontrivial equilibria. Boundary equilibrium $E_0(0, 6.76)$ is a locally asymptotically stable node. Positive equilibrium $E_1^* (7.84,4.07)$ is a saddle point, and positive equilibrium $E_2^* (8.70,3.87)$ is a locally asymptotically stable.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. The effect of time delay $\tau$ in (6) on the level of the positive equilibria shown in the above figure. All other parameters are the same as in Figure 1 except $\tau$ being varied.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. The effect of time delay $\tau$ on stability of the positive equilibrium $E_2^*$ in system (15). A phase portrait indicates that there is a stable periodic solution for $\tau = 4.9$. Parameter values are chosen to be $a_0 = 30, \mu_0 = 0.1,\ \mu_1 = 0.5,\ \mu_2 = 1.5,\ $$b = 2,\ \xi_1 = 4, \xi_2 = 0.51$. Initial conditions is $(w,g) = (10,5)$ for delay $\tau = 1.5$ and $\tau = 4.9$. For delay $\tau = 0$, we have to change initial conditions to $(1,1)$ to obtain a solution converging to the interior equilibrium (while a solution starting at (10, 5) will converges to the trivial equilibrium (0, 0) instead).

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. Two dimensional bifurcation diagram in parameter space $(\tau, b)$. On the graph, the torus bifurcation curve is very close to Fold-Hopf bifurcation curve. To have a better view, we include a zoomed figure.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. A bifurcation diagram of genetically-modified mosquito population $g(t)$ using delay $\tau$ as a bifurcation parameter in model (15).

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. The existence of bi-stability in the form of two stable periodic solutions for $\tau = 5.18$. The solid line corresponds the periodic solution with initial values $(w,g) = (0.5,1.5)$ and the dotted line corresponds to the periodic solution with initial value $(w,g) = (10,5)$. Here, parameter values $a = 30, \mu_0 = 0.1,\ \mu_1 = 0.5,\ $$\mu_2 = 1.5,\ b = 2,\ \xi_1 = 4, \xi_2 = 0.51$.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. The existence of bi-stability in the form of two stable periodic solutions for $\tau = 6.55$. The solid line corresponds to the periodic solution with initial values $(w,g) = (0.5,1.5)$ and the dotted line corresponds to the periodic solution with initial value $(w,g) = (0.71,0.11)$.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. One dimensional bifurcation diagram of periodic solutions in delay $\tau$. Vertical axis is the amplitude of periodic solutions or equilibria.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. Stability change of periodic solutions as delay $\tau$ varies. Vertical axis is the amplitude of periodic solutions.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. The plotting of the profile of periodic solutions along torus bifurcation points.

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]	Mugen Huang, Moxun Tang, Jianshe Yu, Bo Zheng. A stage structured model of delay differential equations for Aedes mosquito population suppression. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3467-3484. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020042
[2]	Kerioui Nadjah, Abdelouahab Mohammed Salah. Stability and Hopf bifurcation of the coexistence equilibrium for a differential-algebraic biological economic system with predator harvesting. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1641-1660. doi: 10.3934/era.2020084
[3]	Bernold Fiedler. Global Hopf bifurcation in networks with fast feedback cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 177-203. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020344
[4]	Thazin Aye, Guanyu Shang, Ying Su. On a stage-structured population model in discrete periodic habitat: III. unimodal growth and delay effect. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021005
[5]	Susmita Sadhu. Complex oscillatory patterns near singular Hopf bifurcation in a two-timescale ecosystem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020342
[6]	Xianyong Chen, Weihua Jiang. Multiple spatiotemporal coexistence states and Turing-Hopf bifurcation in a Lotka-Volterra competition system with nonlocal delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021013
[7]	Yiwen Tao, Jingli Ren. The stability and bifurcation of homogeneous diffusive predator–prey systems with spatio–temporal delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021038
[8]	Xin-Guang Yang, Lu Li, Xingjie Yan, Ling Ding. The structure and stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1395-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2020074
[9]	Yangjian Sun, Changjian Liu. The Poincaré bifurcation of a SD oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1565-1577. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020173
[10]	Wenxiong Chen, Congming Li, Shijie Qi. A Hopf lemma and regularity for fractional $ p $-Laplacians. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3235-3252. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020034
[11]	Ripeng Huang, Shaojian Qu, Xiaoguang Yang, Zhimin Liu. Multi-stage distributionally robust optimization with risk aversion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 233-259. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019109
[12]	Xiyou Cheng, Zhitao Zhang. Structure of positive solutions to a class of Schrödinger systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020461
[13]	Laurent Di Menza, Virginie Joanne-Fabre. An age group model for the study of a population of trees. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020464
[14]	Kimie Nakashima. Indefinite nonlinear diffusion problem in population genetics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3837-3855. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020169
[15]	Toshiko Ogiwara, Danielle Hilhorst, Hiroshi Matano. Convergence and structure theorems for order-preserving dynamical systems with mass conservation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3883-3907. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020129
[16]	Adrian Viorel, Cristian D. Alecsa, Titus O. Pinţa. Asymptotic analysis of a structure-preserving integrator for damped Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020407
[17]	Pablo Neme, Jorge Oviedo. A note on the lattice structure for matching markets via linear programming. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021001
[18]	Ebraheem O. Alzahrani, Muhammad Altaf Khan. Androgen driven evolutionary population dynamics in prostate cancer growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020426
[19]	Mengting Fang, Yuanshi Wang, Mingshu Chen, Donald L. DeAngelis. Asymptotic population abundance of a two-patch system with asymmetric diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3411-3425. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020031
[20]	Attila Dénes, Gergely Röst. Single species population dynamics in seasonal environment with short reproduction period. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (2) : 755-762. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020288

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Figures and Tables

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Dynamics of delayed mosquitoes populations models with two different strategies of releasing sterile mosquitoes

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Dynamics of delayed mosquitoes populations models with two different strategies of releasing sterile mosquitoes

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors