
Previous Article
Null controllability of the LotkaMcKendrick system with spatial diffusion
 MCRF Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Linear quadratic meanfieldgame of backward stochastic differential systems
Inverse Sshaped probability weighting and its impact on investment
1.  Department of SEEM, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China 
2.  College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand 
3.  Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 
4.  Department of IEOR, Columbia University, 500 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA 
In this paper we analyze how changes in inverse Sshaped probability weighting influence optimal portfolio choice in a rankdependent utility model. We derive sufficient conditions for the existence of an optimal solution of the investment problem, and then define the notion of a more inverse Sshaped probability weighting function. We show that an increase in inverse Sshaped weighting typically leads to a lower allocation to the risky asset, regardless of whether the return distribution is skewed left or right, as long as it offers a nonnegligible risk premium. Only for lottery stocks with poor expected returns and extremely positive skewness does an increase in inverse Sshaped probability weighting lead to larger portfolio allocations.
References:
[1] 
A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12 (1985), 171178. Google Scholar 
[2] 
T. G. Bali, N. Cakici and R. F. Whitelaw, Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the crosssection of expected returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 427446. Google Scholar 
[3] 
N. Barberis and M. Huang, Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices, American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 20662100. Google Scholar 
[4] 
H. Bessembinder, Do stocks outperform treasury bills?, Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 440457. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004. Google Scholar 
[5] 
A. Booij, B. van Praag and G. van de Kuilen, A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population, Theory and Decision, 68 (2010), 115148. doi: 10.1007/s1123800991444. Google Scholar 
[6] 
B. Boyer, T. Mitton and K. Vorkink, Expected idiosyncratic skewness, Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 169202. Google Scholar 
[7] 
B. H. Boyer and K. Vorkink, Stock options as lotteries, Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 14851527. Google Scholar 
[8] 
L. Carassus and M. Rasonyi, Maximization of nonconcave utility functions in discretetime financial market models, Mathematics of Operations Research, 41 (2016), 146173. doi: 10.1287/moor.2015.0720. Google Scholar 
[9] 
S. H. Chew, E. Karni and Z. Safra, Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities, Journal of Economic Theory, 42 (1987), 370381. doi: 10.1016/00220531(87)900937. Google Scholar 
[10] 
J. Conrad, R. F. Dittmar and E. Ghysels, Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns, Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 85124. Google Scholar 
[11] 
J. Conrad, N. Kapadia and Y. Xing, Death and jackpot: Why do individual investors hold overpriced stocks?, Journal of Financial Economics, 113 (2014), 455475. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.04.001. Google Scholar 
[12] 
E. G. De Giorgi and S. Legg, Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36 (2012), 951972. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.01.010. Google Scholar 
[13] 
H. FehrDuda and T. Epper, Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probabilitydependent risk preferences, Annual Review of Economics, 4 (2012), 567593. doi: 10.1146/annureveconomics080511110950. Google Scholar 
[14] 
W. M. Goldstein and H. J. Einhorn, Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena, Psychological Review, 94 (1987), 236254. doi: 10.1037/0033295X.94.2.236. Google Scholar 
[15] 
R. Gonzalez and G. Wu, On the shape of the probability weighting function, Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1999), 129166. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0710. Google Scholar 
[16] 
X. D. He, R. Kouwenberg and X. Y. Zhou, Rankdependent utility and risk taking in complete markets, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 8 (2017), 214239. doi: 10.1137/16M1072516. Google Scholar 
[17] 
X. D. He and X. Y. Zhou, Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment, Management Science, 57 (2011), 315331. Google Scholar 
[18] 
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47 (1979), 263291. doi: 10.21236/ADA045771. Google Scholar 
[19] 
D. Kramkov and W. Schachermayer, The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets, Annals of Applied Probability, 9 (1999), 904950. doi: 10.1214/aoap/1029962818. Google Scholar 
[20] 
A. Kumar, Who gambles in the stock market?, Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 18891933. doi: 10.1111/j.15406261.2009.01483.x. Google Scholar 
[21] 
P. K. Lattimore, J. R. Baker and A. D. Witte, Influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17 (1992), 377400. Google Scholar 
[22] 
C. Low, D. Pachamanova and M. Sim, Skewnessaware asset allocation: A new theoretical framework and empirical evidence, Mathematical Finance, 22 (2012), 379410. doi: 10.1111/j.14679965.2010.00463.x. Google Scholar 
[23] 
I. P. Natanson, Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, vol. 1, Frederick Ungar, New York, 1955. Google Scholar 
[24] 
V. Polkovnichenko, Household portfolio diversification: A case for rankdependent preferences, Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 14671502. Google Scholar 
[25] 
A. Tversky and C. R. Fox, Weighing risk and uncertainty, Psychological Review, 102 (1995), 269283. doi: 10.1037/0033295X.102.2.269. Google Scholar 
[26] 
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (1992), 297323. doi: 10.1007/9783319204512_24. Google Scholar 
show all references
References:
[1] 
A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12 (1985), 171178. Google Scholar 
[2] 
T. G. Bali, N. Cakici and R. F. Whitelaw, Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the crosssection of expected returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 427446. Google Scholar 
[3] 
N. Barberis and M. Huang, Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices, American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 20662100. Google Scholar 
[4] 
H. Bessembinder, Do stocks outperform treasury bills?, Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 440457. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.004. Google Scholar 
[5] 
A. Booij, B. van Praag and G. van de Kuilen, A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population, Theory and Decision, 68 (2010), 115148. doi: 10.1007/s1123800991444. Google Scholar 
[6] 
B. Boyer, T. Mitton and K. Vorkink, Expected idiosyncratic skewness, Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 169202. Google Scholar 
[7] 
B. H. Boyer and K. Vorkink, Stock options as lotteries, Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 14851527. Google Scholar 
[8] 
L. Carassus and M. Rasonyi, Maximization of nonconcave utility functions in discretetime financial market models, Mathematics of Operations Research, 41 (2016), 146173. doi: 10.1287/moor.2015.0720. Google Scholar 
[9] 
S. H. Chew, E. Karni and Z. Safra, Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities, Journal of Economic Theory, 42 (1987), 370381. doi: 10.1016/00220531(87)900937. Google Scholar 
[10] 
J. Conrad, R. F. Dittmar and E. Ghysels, Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns, Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 85124. Google Scholar 
[11] 
J. Conrad, N. Kapadia and Y. Xing, Death and jackpot: Why do individual investors hold overpriced stocks?, Journal of Financial Economics, 113 (2014), 455475. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.04.001. Google Scholar 
[12] 
E. G. De Giorgi and S. Legg, Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36 (2012), 951972. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.01.010. Google Scholar 
[13] 
H. FehrDuda and T. Epper, Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probabilitydependent risk preferences, Annual Review of Economics, 4 (2012), 567593. doi: 10.1146/annureveconomics080511110950. Google Scholar 
[14] 
W. M. Goldstein and H. J. Einhorn, Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena, Psychological Review, 94 (1987), 236254. doi: 10.1037/0033295X.94.2.236. Google Scholar 
[15] 
R. Gonzalez and G. Wu, On the shape of the probability weighting function, Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1999), 129166. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0710. Google Scholar 
[16] 
X. D. He, R. Kouwenberg and X. Y. Zhou, Rankdependent utility and risk taking in complete markets, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 8 (2017), 214239. doi: 10.1137/16M1072516. Google Scholar 
[17] 
X. D. He and X. Y. Zhou, Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment, Management Science, 57 (2011), 315331. Google Scholar 
[18] 
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47 (1979), 263291. doi: 10.21236/ADA045771. Google Scholar 
[19] 
D. Kramkov and W. Schachermayer, The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets, Annals of Applied Probability, 9 (1999), 904950. doi: 10.1214/aoap/1029962818. Google Scholar 
[20] 
A. Kumar, Who gambles in the stock market?, Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 18891933. doi: 10.1111/j.15406261.2009.01483.x. Google Scholar 
[21] 
P. K. Lattimore, J. R. Baker and A. D. Witte, Influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17 (1992), 377400. Google Scholar 
[22] 
C. Low, D. Pachamanova and M. Sim, Skewnessaware asset allocation: A new theoretical framework and empirical evidence, Mathematical Finance, 22 (2012), 379410. doi: 10.1111/j.14679965.2010.00463.x. Google Scholar 
[23] 
I. P. Natanson, Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, vol. 1, Frederick Ungar, New York, 1955. Google Scholar 
[24] 
V. Polkovnichenko, Household portfolio diversification: A case for rankdependent preferences, Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 14671502. Google Scholar 
[25] 
A. Tversky and C. R. Fox, Weighing risk and uncertainty, Psychological Review, 102 (1995), 269283. doi: 10.1037/0033295X.102.2.269. Google Scholar 
[26] 
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (1992), 297323. doi: 10.1007/9783319204512_24. Google Scholar 
[1] 
Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 
[2] 
Haixiang Yao, Ping Chen, Miao Zhang, Xun Li. Dynamic discretetime portfolio selection for defined contribution pension funds with inflation risk. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020166 
[3] 
Mohammed Abdulrazaq Kahya, Suhaib Abduljabbar Altamir, Zakariya Yahya Algamal. Improving whale optimization algorithm for feature selection with a timevarying transfer function. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 8798. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020017 
[4] 
Gunther Uhlmann, Jian Zhai. Inverse problems for nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2021, 41 (1) : 455469. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020380 
[5] 
Yifan Chen, Thomas Y. Hou. Function approximation via the subsampled Poincaré inequality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2021, 41 (1) : 169199. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020296 
[6] 
Nalin Fonseka, Jerome Goddard II, Ratnasingham Shivaji, Byungjae Son. A diffusive weak Allee effect model with Ushaped emigration and matrix hostility. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020356 
[7] 
Jiaquan Liu, Xiangqing Liu, ZhiQiang Wang. Signchanging solutions for a parameterdependent quasilinear equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020454 
[8] 
Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasireversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 11071133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 
[9] 
Chao Wang, Qihuai Liu, Zhiguo Wang. Periodic bouncing solutions for Hill's type sublinear oscillators with obstacles. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 281300. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020266 
[10] 
José Madrid, João P. G. Ramos. On optimal autocorrelation inequalities on the real line. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 369388. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020271 
[11] 
Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dualchannel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167 
[12] 
Soniya Singh, Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of second order impulsive systems with statedependent delay in Banach spaces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020 doi: 10.3934/eect.2020103 
[13] 
Dan Zhu, Rosemary A. Renaut, Hongwei Li, Tianyou Liu. Fast nonconvex lowrank matrix decomposition for separation of potential field data using minimal memory. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : . doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020076 
[14] 
Sihem Guerarra. Maximum and minimum ranks and inertias of the Hermitian parts of the least rank solution of the matrix equation AXB = C. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 7586. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020016 
[15] 
Russell Ricks. The unique measure of maximal entropy for a compact rank one locally CAT(0) space. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  A, 2021, 41 (2) : 507523. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020266 
[16] 
YiHsuan Lin, Gen Nakamura, Roland Potthast, Haibing Wang. Duality between range and noresponse tests and its application for inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : . doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020072 
[17] 
Kha Van Huynh, Barbara Kaltenbacher. Some application examples of minimization based formulations of inverse problems and their regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : . doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020074 
[18] 
Lingfeng Li, Shousheng Luo, XueCheng Tai, Jiang Yang. A new variational approach based on levelset function for convex hull problem with outliers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : . doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020070 
[19] 
Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019 
[20] 
Sergio Conti, Georg Dolzmann. Optimal laminates in singleslip elastoplasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2021, 14 (1) : 116. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020302 
2019 Impact Factor: 0.857
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]