March  2021, 11(1): 95-117. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020029

Finite-dimensional controllers for robust regulation of boundary control systems

1. 

Institut für Mathematik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 13/7, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

2. 

Mathematics, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, PO. Box 692, 33101 Tampere, Finland

* Corresponding author: duy.phan-duc@uibk.ac.at

Received  November 2019 Revised  March 2020 Published  June 2020

We study the robust output regulation of linear boundary control systems by constructing extended systems. The extended systems are established based on solving static differential equations under two new conditions. We first consider the abstract setting and present finite-dimensional reduced order controllers. The controller design is then used for particular PDE models: high-dimensional parabolic equations and beam equations with Kelvin-Voigt damping. Numerical examples will be presented using Finite Element Method.

Citation: Duy Phan, Lassi Paunonen. Finite-dimensional controllers for robust regulation of boundary control systems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 95-117. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020029
References:
[1]

M. Badra, Feedback stabilization of the 2-D and 3-D Navier-Stokes equations based on an extended system, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 15 (2009), 934-968.  doi: 10.1051/cocv:2008059.  Google Scholar

[2]

H. T. Banks and K. Kunisch, The linear regulator problem for parabolic systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 22 (1984), 684-698.  doi: 10.1137/0322043.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. F. Curtain and H. Zwart, An Introduction to Infinite–Dimensional Linear Systems Theory. Texts in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 21, Springer-Verlag New York, 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4224-6.  Google Scholar

[4]

B.-Z. GuoH.-C. ZhouA. S. AL-FhaidA. M. M. Younas and A. Asiri, Stabilization of Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation with Boundary Moment Control and Disturbance by Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Sliding Mode Control Approaches, J. Dyn. Control Syst., 20 (2014), 539-558.  doi: 10.1007/s10883-014-9241-8.  Google Scholar

[5]

T. Hämäläinen and S. Pohjolainen, Robust regulation for exponentially stable boundary control systems in Hilbert space, in Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Szczecin, Poland, 2002,171–178. Google Scholar

[6]

T. Hämäläinen and S. Pohjolainen, Robust regulation of distributed parameter systems with infinite-dimensional exosystems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4846-4873.  doi: 10.1137/090757976.  Google Scholar

[7]

E. Immonen, On the internal model structure for infinite-dimensional systems: Two common controller types and repetitive control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 45 (2007), 2065-2093.  doi: 10.1137/050638916.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Ito and K. Morris, An approximation theory of solutions to operator Riccati equations for $H^\infty$ control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 36 (1998), 82-99.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012994274422.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. Logemann and S. Townley, Low-gain control of uncertain regular linear systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 35 (1997), 78-116.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012994275920.  Google Scholar

[10]

L. Paunonen and D. Phan, Reduced order controller design for robust output regulation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, (2019), 1–1. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2930185.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Paunonen, Controller design for robust output regulation of regular linear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 61 (2016), 2974-2986.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2015.2509439.  Google Scholar

[12]

D. Phan and S. S. Rodrigues, Stabilization to trajectories for parabolic equations, Math. Control Signals Systems, 30 (2018), Art. 11, 50 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00498-018-0218-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. Rebarber and G. Weiss, Internal model based tracking and disturbance rejection for stable well-posed systems, Automatica J. IFAC, 39 (2003), 1555-1569.  doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00192-4.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. S. Rodrigues, Boundary observability inequalities for the 3D Oseen-Stokes system and applications, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 21 (2015), 723-756.  doi: 10.1051/cocv/2014045.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. Salamon, Infinite-dimensional linear systems with unbounded control and observation: A functional analytic approach, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 300 (1987), 383-431.  doi: 10.2307/2000351.  Google Scholar

[16]

O. Staffans, Well-Posed Linear Systems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 103, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511543197.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8994-9.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. Badra, Feedback stabilization of the 2-D and 3-D Navier-Stokes equations based on an extended system, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 15 (2009), 934-968.  doi: 10.1051/cocv:2008059.  Google Scholar

[2]

H. T. Banks and K. Kunisch, The linear regulator problem for parabolic systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 22 (1984), 684-698.  doi: 10.1137/0322043.  Google Scholar

[3]

R. F. Curtain and H. Zwart, An Introduction to Infinite–Dimensional Linear Systems Theory. Texts in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 21, Springer-Verlag New York, 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4224-6.  Google Scholar

[4]

B.-Z. GuoH.-C. ZhouA. S. AL-FhaidA. M. M. Younas and A. Asiri, Stabilization of Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation with Boundary Moment Control and Disturbance by Active Disturbance Rejection Control and Sliding Mode Control Approaches, J. Dyn. Control Syst., 20 (2014), 539-558.  doi: 10.1007/s10883-014-9241-8.  Google Scholar

[5]

T. Hämäläinen and S. Pohjolainen, Robust regulation for exponentially stable boundary control systems in Hilbert space, in Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Szczecin, Poland, 2002,171–178. Google Scholar

[6]

T. Hämäläinen and S. Pohjolainen, Robust regulation of distributed parameter systems with infinite-dimensional exosystems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2010), 4846-4873.  doi: 10.1137/090757976.  Google Scholar

[7]

E. Immonen, On the internal model structure for infinite-dimensional systems: Two common controller types and repetitive control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 45 (2007), 2065-2093.  doi: 10.1137/050638916.  Google Scholar

[8]

K. Ito and K. Morris, An approximation theory of solutions to operator Riccati equations for $H^\infty$ control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 36 (1998), 82-99.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012994274422.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. Logemann and S. Townley, Low-gain control of uncertain regular linear systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 35 (1997), 78-116.  doi: 10.1137/S0363012994275920.  Google Scholar

[10]

L. Paunonen and D. Phan, Reduced order controller design for robust output regulation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, (2019), 1–1. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2930185.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Paunonen, Controller design for robust output regulation of regular linear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 61 (2016), 2974-2986.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2015.2509439.  Google Scholar

[12]

D. Phan and S. S. Rodrigues, Stabilization to trajectories for parabolic equations, Math. Control Signals Systems, 30 (2018), Art. 11, 50 pp. doi: 10.1007/s00498-018-0218-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

R. Rebarber and G. Weiss, Internal model based tracking and disturbance rejection for stable well-posed systems, Automatica J. IFAC, 39 (2003), 1555-1569.  doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00192-4.  Google Scholar

[14]

S. S. Rodrigues, Boundary observability inequalities for the 3D Oseen-Stokes system and applications, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 21 (2015), 723-756.  doi: 10.1051/cocv/2014045.  Google Scholar

[15]

D. Salamon, Infinite-dimensional linear systems with unbounded control and observation: A functional analytic approach, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 300 (1987), 383-431.  doi: 10.2307/2000351.  Google Scholar

[16]

O. Staffans, Well-Posed Linear Systems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 103, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511543197.  Google Scholar

[17]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8994-9.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Boundary controls located on red segments and regions of observations (blue)
Figure 2.  Two extensions of boundary actuators
Figure 3.  Output tracking of the boundary control of the 2D parabolic equation
Figure 4.  Hankel singular values
Figure 5.  Solutions of ODEs
Figure 6.  Output tracking of the boundary controlled beam equation with two different extensions
[1]

Dominique Chapelle, Philippe Moireau, Patrick Le Tallec. Robust filtering for joint state-parameter estimation in distributed mechanical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 65-84. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.65

[2]

Bin Wang, Lin Mu. Viscosity robust weak Galerkin finite element methods for Stokes problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1881-1895. doi: 10.3934/era.2020096

[3]

Chongyang Liu, Meijia Han, Zhaohua Gong, Kok Lay Teo. Robust parameter estimation for constrained time-delay systems with inexact measurements. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 317-337. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019113

[4]

Divine Wanduku. Finite- and multi-dimensional state representations and some fundamental asymptotic properties of a family of nonlinear multi-population models for HIV/AIDS with ART treatment and distributed delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021005

[5]

Baoli Yin, Yang Liu, Hong Li, Zhimin Zhang. Approximation methods for the distributed order calculus using the convolution quadrature. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1447-1468. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020168

[6]

P. K. Jha, R. Lipton. Finite element approximation of nonlocal dynamic fracture models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1675-1710. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020178

[7]

Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120

[8]

Xiu Ye, Shangyou Zhang, Peng Zhu. A weak Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear conservation laws. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1897-1923. doi: 10.3934/era.2020097

[9]

Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao. Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126

[10]

Ilyasse Lamrani, Imad El Harraki, Ali Boutoulout, Fatima-Zahrae El Alaoui. Feedback stabilization of bilinear coupled hyperbolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020434

[11]

Simone Fagioli, Emanuela Radici. Opinion formation systems via deterministic particles approximation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2021, 14 (1) : 45-76. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020048

[12]

Touria Karite, Ali Boutoulout. Global and regional constrained controllability for distributed parabolic linear systems: RHUM approach. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020055

[13]

Yicheng Liu, Yipeng Chen, Jun Wu, Xiao Wang. Periodic consensus in network systems with general distributed processing delays. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2020  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021002

[14]

Anton A. Kutsenko. Isomorphism between one-dimensional and multidimensional finite difference operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 359-368. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020270

[15]

Shenglan Xie, Maoan Han, Peng Zhu. A posteriori error estimate of weak Galerkin fem for second order elliptic problem with mixed boundary condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020340

[16]

Ludovick Gagnon, José M. Urquiza. Uniform boundary observability with Legendre-Galerkin formulations of the 1-D wave equation. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 129-153. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020054

[17]

Yubiao Liu, Chunguo Zhang, Tehuan Chen. Stabilization of 2-d Mindlin-Timoshenko plates with localized acoustic boundary feedback. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021006

[18]

Mokhtari Yacine. Boundary controllability and boundary time-varying feedback stabilization of the 1D wave equation in non-cylindrical domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021004

[19]

Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003

[20]

Xiaoli Lu, Pengzhan Huang, Yinnian He. Fully discrete finite element approximation of the 2D/3D unsteady incompressible magnetohydrodynamic-Voigt regularization flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 815-845. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020143

2019 Impact Factor: 0.857

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]