American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020055

Exact noise cancellation for 1d-acoustic propagation systems

Jérôme Lohéac 1,, , Chaouki N. E. Boultifat 2, , Philippe Chevrel 2, and  Mohamed Yagoubi 2,

1. 

Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000 Nancy, France
2. 

IMT-Atlantique, LS2N UMR CNRS 6004, (Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes), F-44307 Nantes, France

* Corresponding author

Received  March 2020 Revised  August 2020 Published  December 2020

This paper deals with active noise control applied to a one-dimensional acoustic propagation system. The aim here is to keep over time a zero noise level at a given point. We aim to design this control using noise measurement at some point in the spatial domain. Based on symmetry property, we are able to design a feedback boundary control allowing this fact. Moreover, using D'Alembert formula, an explicit formula of the control can be computed. Even if the focus is made on the wave equation, this approach is easily extendable to more general operators.

Keywords: Active noise control, noise cancellation, 1D-wave equation, boundary control, D'Alembert formula.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35L05, 93B52, 93C20; Secondary: 93B53.
Citation: Jérôme Lohéac, Chaouki N. E. Boultifat, Philippe Chevrel, Mohamed Yagoubi. Exact noise cancellation for 1d-acoustic propagation systems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020055
References:
[1]

M. R. Bai and H. Lin, Plant uncertainty analysis in a duct active noise control problem by using the $H_\infty$ theory, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104 (1998), 237-247.  doi: 10.1121/1.423274.  Google Scholar

[2]

C. Bardos, G. Lebeau and J. Rauch, Sharp sufficient conditions for the observation, control, and stabilization of waves from the boundary, SIAM J. Control Optim., 30 (1992), 1024-1065.  doi: 10.1137/0330055.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. Bodson, J. S. Jensen and S. C. Douglas, Active noise control for periodic disturbances, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC(IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207), 4 (1998), 2616-2620.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.1998.703109.  Google Scholar

[4]

C. Boultifat, P. Chevrel, J. Lohéac, M. Yagoubi and P. Loiseau, One-dimensional acoustic propagation model and spatial multi-point active noise control, in 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2017), 2947–2952. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2017.8264088.  Google Scholar

[5]

C. Boultifat, P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, J. Lohéac and M. Yagoubi, FxLMS versus $H_\infty$ control for broadband acoustic noise attenuation in a cavity, IFAC-PapersOnLine (20th IFAC World Congress), 50 (2017), 9204-9210.  doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1277.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Cattaneo and L. Fontana, D'Alembert formula on finite one-dimensional networks, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 284 (2003), 403-424.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00392-X.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. Dáger and E. Zuazua, Wave Propagation, Observation and Control in 1-D Flexible Multi-Structures, Mathématiques & Applications (Berlin), Mathematics & Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. doi: 10.1007/3-540-37726-3.  Google Scholar

[8]

H. Feng and B.-Z. Guo, Observer design and exponential stabilization for wave equation in energy space by boundary displacement measurement only, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 1438-1444.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2572122.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. Feng and B.-Z. Guo, A new active disturbance rejection control to output feedback stabilization for a one-dimensional anti-stable wave equation with disturbance, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 3774-3787.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2636571.  Google Scholar

[10]

B.-Z. Guo and F.-F. Jin, Output feedback stabilization for one-dimensional wave equation subject to boundary disturbance, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 60 (2015), 824-830.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2335374.  Google Scholar

[11]

W. Guo, Z.-C. Shao and M. Krstic, Adaptive rejection of harmonic disturbance anticollocated with control in 1d wave equation, Automatica J. IFAC, 79 (2017), 17-26.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.01.034.  Google Scholar

[12]

B.-Z. Guo and C.-Z. Xu, The stabilization of a one-dimensional wave equation by boundary feedback with noncollocated observation, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 52 (2007), 371-377.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2006.890385.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Gugat, Exponential stabilization of the wave equation by Dirichlet integral feedback, SIAM J. Control Optim., 53 (2015), 526-546.  doi: 10.1137/140977023.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Time delay in optimal control loops for wave equations, ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var., 23 (2017), 13-37.  doi: 10.1051/cocv/2015038.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. Komornik, Exact Controllability and Stabilization, The Multiplier Method., RAM: Research in Applied Mathematics, Masson, Paris, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1994.  Google Scholar

[16]

S. M. Kuo and D. R. Morgan, Active noise control: A tutorial review, Proceedings of the IEEE, 87 (1999), 943-973.  doi: 10.1109/5.763310.  Google Scholar

[17]

J. le Rond D'Alembert, Recherches sur la courbe que forme une corde tendue mise en vibrations, Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres (Année 1747), 3 (1747), 214–249. Google Scholar

[18]

J.-L. Lions, Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems, SIAM Rev., 30 (1988), 1-68.  doi: 10.1137/1030001.  Google Scholar

[19]

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. I., Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 181, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972.  Google Scholar

[20]

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. II, Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 182, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972.  Google Scholar

[21]

P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, M. Yagoubi and J. Duffal, Broadband active noise control design through nonsmooth $H_\infty$ synthesis, IFAC-PapersOnLine (8th IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design ROCOND 2015), 48 (2015), 396-401.  doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.489.  Google Scholar

[22]

P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, M. Yagoubi and J.-M. Duffal, $H_\infty$ multi-objective and multi-model MIMO control design for broadband noise attenuation in an enclosure, in 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), (2016), 643–648. doi: 10.1109/ECC.2016.7810361.  Google Scholar

[23]

R. T. O'Brien, J. M. Watkins, G. E. Piper and D. C. Baumann, $H_\infty$ active noise control of fan noise in an acoustic duct, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334), 5 (2000), 3028-3032.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.2000.879121.  Google Scholar

[24]

B. Rafaely and S. J. Elliott, $H_2/H_\infty$ active control of sound in a headrest: Design and implementation, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 7 (1999), 79-84.  doi: 10.1109/87.736757.  Google Scholar

[25]

B. Sayyarrodsari, J. P. How, B. Hassibi and A. Carrier, An $H_{\infty}$-optimal alternative to the FxLMS algorithm, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207), 2 (1998), 1116-1121.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.1998.703585.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups, Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrbücher, Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basel Textbooks, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8994-9.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, From exact observability to identification of singular sources, Math. Control Signals Systems, 27 (2015), 1-21.  doi: 10.1007/s00498-014-0132-z.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. R. Bai and H. Lin, Plant uncertainty analysis in a duct active noise control problem by using the $H_\infty$ theory, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104 (1998), 237-247.  doi: 10.1121/1.423274.  Google Scholar

[2]

C. Bardos, G. Lebeau and J. Rauch, Sharp sufficient conditions for the observation, control, and stabilization of waves from the boundary, SIAM J. Control Optim., 30 (1992), 1024-1065.  doi: 10.1137/0330055.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. Bodson, J. S. Jensen and S. C. Douglas, Active noise control for periodic disturbances, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC(IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207), 4 (1998), 2616-2620.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.1998.703109.  Google Scholar

[4]

C. Boultifat, P. Chevrel, J. Lohéac, M. Yagoubi and P. Loiseau, One-dimensional acoustic propagation model and spatial multi-point active noise control, in 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2017), 2947–2952. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2017.8264088.  Google Scholar

[5]

C. Boultifat, P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, J. Lohéac and M. Yagoubi, FxLMS versus $H_\infty$ control for broadband acoustic noise attenuation in a cavity, IFAC-PapersOnLine (20th IFAC World Congress), 50 (2017), 9204-9210.  doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1277.  Google Scholar

[6]

C. Cattaneo and L. Fontana, D'Alembert formula on finite one-dimensional networks, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 284 (2003), 403-424.  doi: 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00392-X.  Google Scholar

[7]

R. Dáger and E. Zuazua, Wave Propagation, Observation and Control in 1-D Flexible Multi-Structures, Mathématiques & Applications (Berlin), Mathematics & Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. doi: 10.1007/3-540-37726-3.  Google Scholar

[8]

H. Feng and B.-Z. Guo, Observer design and exponential stabilization for wave equation in energy space by boundary displacement measurement only, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 1438-1444.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2572122.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. Feng and B.-Z. Guo, A new active disturbance rejection control to output feedback stabilization for a one-dimensional anti-stable wave equation with disturbance, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2017), 3774-3787.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2636571.  Google Scholar

[10]

B.-Z. Guo and F.-F. Jin, Output feedback stabilization for one-dimensional wave equation subject to boundary disturbance, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 60 (2015), 824-830.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2335374.  Google Scholar

[11]

W. Guo, Z.-C. Shao and M. Krstic, Adaptive rejection of harmonic disturbance anticollocated with control in 1d wave equation, Automatica J. IFAC, 79 (2017), 17-26.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.01.034.  Google Scholar

[12]

B.-Z. Guo and C.-Z. Xu, The stabilization of a one-dimensional wave equation by boundary feedback with noncollocated observation, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 52 (2007), 371-377.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2006.890385.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Gugat, Exponential stabilization of the wave equation by Dirichlet integral feedback, SIAM J. Control Optim., 53 (2015), 526-546.  doi: 10.1137/140977023.  Google Scholar

[14]

M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Time delay in optimal control loops for wave equations, ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var., 23 (2017), 13-37.  doi: 10.1051/cocv/2015038.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. Komornik, Exact Controllability and Stabilization, The Multiplier Method., RAM: Research in Applied Mathematics, Masson, Paris, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1994.  Google Scholar

[16]

S. M. Kuo and D. R. Morgan, Active noise control: A tutorial review, Proceedings of the IEEE, 87 (1999), 943-973.  doi: 10.1109/5.763310.  Google Scholar

[17]

J. le Rond D'Alembert, Recherches sur la courbe que forme une corde tendue mise en vibrations, Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles Lettres (Année 1747), 3 (1747), 214–249. Google Scholar

[18]

J.-L. Lions, Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations for distributed systems, SIAM Rev., 30 (1988), 1-68.  doi: 10.1137/1030001.  Google Scholar

[19]

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. I., Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 181, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972.  Google Scholar

[20]

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. II, Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 182, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972.  Google Scholar

[21]

P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, M. Yagoubi and J. Duffal, Broadband active noise control design through nonsmooth $H_\infty$ synthesis, IFAC-PapersOnLine (8th IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design ROCOND 2015), 48 (2015), 396-401.  doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.489.  Google Scholar

[22]

P. Loiseau, P. Chevrel, M. Yagoubi and J.-M. Duffal, $H_\infty$ multi-objective and multi-model MIMO control design for broadband noise attenuation in an enclosure, in 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), (2016), 643–648. doi: 10.1109/ECC.2016.7810361.  Google Scholar

[23]

R. T. O'Brien, J. M. Watkins, G. E. Piper and D. C. Baumann, $H_\infty$ active noise control of fan noise in an acoustic duct, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334), 5 (2000), 3028-3032.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.2000.879121.  Google Scholar

[24]

B. Rafaely and S. J. Elliott, $H_2/H_\infty$ active control of sound in a headrest: Design and implementation, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 7 (1999), 79-84.  doi: 10.1109/87.736757.  Google Scholar

[25]

B. Sayyarrodsari, J. P. How, B. Hassibi and A. Carrier, An $H_{\infty}$-optimal alternative to the FxLMS algorithm, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207), 2 (1998), 1116-1121.  doi: 10.1109/ACC.1998.703585.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, Observation and Control for Operator Semigroups, Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrbücher, Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basel Textbooks, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8994-9.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Tucsnak and G. Weiss, From exact observability to identification of singular sources, Math. Control Signals Systems, 27 (2015), 1-21.  doi: 10.1007/s00498-014-0132-z.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Experimental setup used to derive the system (1), $ e(t) = p(t, x_c) $ is the sound pressure measured at the controlled point
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Illustration of the positions assumptions for the acoustic system (2)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Plots of the control and disturbance effect on $ p(t, 0) $. (Parameter and disturbances used are given in Table 1.)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Parameters and disturbance used for the numerical illustration of Figure 3
$ L $ $ \xi $ $ \omega $ $ d(t) $ $ d_0(t, x) $
$ 2 $ $ 3/4 $ $ (a, b) $ with $ \sin(5t) $ $ 10\sin(3t)(x-a)(x-b) $
$ a=-7/4 $ and $ b=-5/4 $
Table Options

Download as excel

$ L $ $ \xi $ $ \omega $ $ d(t) $ $ d_0(t, x) $
$ 2 $ $ 3/4 $ $ (a, b) $ with $ \sin(5t) $ $ 10\sin(3t)(x-a)(x-b) $
$ a=-7/4 $ and $ b=-5/4 $
[1]

Ludovick Gagnon, José M. Urquiza. Uniform boundary observability with Legendre-Galerkin formulations of the 1-D wave equation. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 129-153. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020054
[2]

Xiaorui Wang, Genqi Xu, Hao Chen. Uniform stabilization of 1-D Schrödinger equation with internal difference-type control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021022
[3]

Mokhtari Yacine. Boundary controllability and boundary time-varying feedback stabilization of the 1D wave equation in non-cylindrical domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021004
[4]

Leanne Dong. Random attractors for stochastic Navier-Stokes equation on a 2D rotating sphere with stable Lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020352
[5]

Xu Zhang, Chuang Zheng, Enrique Zuazua. Time discrete wave equations: Boundary observability and control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 571-604. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.571
[6]

Bopeng Rao, Zhuangyi Liu. A spectral approach to the indirect boundary control of a system of weakly coupled wave equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 399-414. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.399
[7]

Justin Holmer, Chang Liu. Blow-up for the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation with point nonlinearity II: Supercritical blow-up profiles. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 215-242. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020264
[8]

Larissa Fardigola, Kateryna Khalina. Controllability problems for the heat equation on a half-axis with a bounded control in the Neumann boundary condition. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 211-236. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020034
[9]

Oleg Yu. Imanuvilov, Jean Pierre Puel. On global controllability of 2-D Burgers equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 299-313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.299
[10]

Shang Wu, Pengfei Xu, Jianhua Huang, Wei Yan. Ergodicity of stochastic damped Ostrovsky equation driven by white noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1615-1626. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020175
[11]

Waixiang Cao, Lueling Jia, Zhimin Zhang. A $ C^1 $ Petrov-Galerkin method and Gauss collocation method for 1D general elliptic problems and superconvergence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 81-105. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020327
[12]

Sujit Kumar Samanta, Rakesh Nandi. Analysis of $GI^{[X]}/D$-$MSP/1/\infty$ queue using $RG$-factorization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 549-573. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019123
[13]

Duy Phan, Lassi Paunonen. Finite-dimensional controllers for robust regulation of boundary control systems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021, 11 (1) : 95-117. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020029
[14]

Hongbo Guan, Yong Yang, Huiqing Zhu. A nonuniform anisotropic FEM for elliptic boundary layer optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1711-1722. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020179
[15]

Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003
[16]

Christian Clason, Vu Huu Nhu, Arnd Rösch. Optimal control of a non-smooth quasilinear elliptic equation. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020052
[17]

Yubiao Liu, Chunguo Zhang, Tehuan Chen. Stabilization of 2-d Mindlin-Timoshenko plates with localized acoustic boundary feedback. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021006
[18]

Xin-Guang Yang, Lu Li, Xingjie Yan, Ling Ding. The structure and stability of pullback attractors for 3D Brinkman-Forchheimer equation with delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1395-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2020074
[19]

Mingchao Zhao, You-Wei Wen, Michael Ng, Hongwei Li. A nonlocal low rank model for poisson noise removal. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021003
[20]

Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019

2019 Impact Factor: 0.857

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences