American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    A DC programming approach for a class of bilevel programming problems and its application in Portfolio Selection
  • NACO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    A class of smoothing SAA methods for a stochastic linear complementarity problem
2012, 2(1): 157-165. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.157

Identification of water quality model parameters using artificial bee colony algorithm

Guangzhou Chen 1, , Guijian Liu 2, , Jiaquan Wang 3, and  Ruzhong Li 3,

1. 

Department of Environmental Engineering, Anhui University of Architecture, No. 856, JinZhai South Road, Hefei 230022, China
2. 

School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Hefei 230026, China
3. 

School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, No. 193, TunXi Road, Hefei 230009, China, China

Received  February 2011 Revised  October 2011 Published  March 2012

As prime data of water quality model, water quality parameters are of importance to forecast the situation of water quality correctly. Therefore, it is a key to identify them correctly. Aimed at the parameter identification problem, it can be transformed into an optimization problem by constructing objective function that minimizes simulation errors. In this study, a novel swarm intelligence optimization algorithm-artificial bee colony algorithm was used. In the experiment, many tests were done under the various ranges of parameters, and each variable was optimized according to its own reasonable scope. In addition, the optimization effect was compared based on the two methods producing new solutions in the neighborhood. As a key parameter of the algorithm, the impact of limit value on the algorithm performance was analyzed in detail under various values. Finally, two examples were analyzed and their computation results were compared with that of artificial fish swarm algorithm, simulated annealing and genetic algorithm. The results show that artificial bee colony algorithm has good adaptability to various ranges of parameters and better optimization precision. Moreover, it needs few control parameters of algorithm. So it is an effective parameter identification method.
Keywords: artificial bee colony algorithm, Parameter identification, water quality model, global optimization..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65K99; Secondary: 90C3.
Citation: Guangzhou Chen, Guijian Liu, Jiaquan Wang, Ruzhong Li. Identification of water quality model parameters using artificial bee colony algorithm. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 157-165. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.157
References:
[1]

G. Z. Chen, X. C. Xu and J. Q. Wang, Application of a modified artificial fish swarm algorithm to identification of water quality parameters,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 29 (2010), 108.   Google Scholar

[2]

G. W. Fu, "River Water Quality Model and Simulation Computation,", 1st edition, (1987).   Google Scholar

[3]

J. Q. Guo, Y. Li and H. S. Wang, Chaotic optimization for parameter estimation of water quality model of river,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 15 (2004), 95.   Google Scholar

[4]

J. Q. Guo, Y. Li and H. S. Wang, Application of particle swarm optimization algorithms to determination of water quality parameters of river streams,, Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 27 (2007), 1.   Google Scholar

[5]

F. Kang, J. J. Li and Q. Xu, Improved artificial bee colony algorithm and its application in back analysis,, Water Resources and Power, 27 (2009), 126.   Google Scholar

[6]

D. Karaboga, An idea based on bee swarm for numerical optimization [R],, Technical Report-TR06, (2005).   Google Scholar

[7]

Y. H. Jia, Determination of water quality parameter based on genetic algorithm,, Haihe Water Resources, 1 (2008), 41.   Google Scholar

[8]

D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) Algorithm,, Journal of Global Optimization, 39 (2007), 459.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x.  Google Scholar

[9]

D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm,, Applied Soft Computing, 8 (2008), 687.  doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.007.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Karaboga, Artificial bee colony algorithm,, Scholarpedia, 5 (2010).  doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.6915.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Q. Meng and J. Q. Guo, Application of chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm to determination of water quality parameter of river steam,, Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 31 (2009), 169.   Google Scholar

[12]

J. P. Wang and S. T. Cheng, Application of genetic algorithm and simplex method in parameter identification of complicated environmental model,, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 36 (2005), 674.   Google Scholar

[13]

W. Wang, G. M. Zeng and L. He, Estimation of water quality model parameters with simulated annealing algorithm,, Shui Li Xue Bao, 6 (2004), 61.   Google Scholar

[14]

X. H. Yang, Z. F. Yang and J. Q. Li, A new method for parameter identification in water environment model,, Advances in Water Science, 14 (2003), 554.   Google Scholar

[15]

Y. J. Zhang, J. Q. Guo and H. S. Wang, Chaotic-Annealing algorithm for parameter identification of river water quality model,, China Rural Water and Hydropower, 1 (2006), 38.   Google Scholar

[16]

S. Zhu, G. H. Mao and G. H. Liu, Parameters identification of river water quality model based on finite volume method-hybrid genetic algorithm,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 26 (2007), 91.   Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

G. Z. Chen, X. C. Xu and J. Q. Wang, Application of a modified artificial fish swarm algorithm to identification of water quality parameters,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 29 (2010), 108.   Google Scholar

[2]

G. W. Fu, "River Water Quality Model and Simulation Computation,", 1st edition, (1987).   Google Scholar

[3]

J. Q. Guo, Y. Li and H. S. Wang, Chaotic optimization for parameter estimation of water quality model of river,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 15 (2004), 95.   Google Scholar

[4]

J. Q. Guo, Y. Li and H. S. Wang, Application of particle swarm optimization algorithms to determination of water quality parameters of river streams,, Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 27 (2007), 1.   Google Scholar

[5]

F. Kang, J. J. Li and Q. Xu, Improved artificial bee colony algorithm and its application in back analysis,, Water Resources and Power, 27 (2009), 126.   Google Scholar

[6]

D. Karaboga, An idea based on bee swarm for numerical optimization [R],, Technical Report-TR06, (2005).   Google Scholar

[7]

Y. H. Jia, Determination of water quality parameter based on genetic algorithm,, Haihe Water Resources, 1 (2008), 41.   Google Scholar

[8]

D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) Algorithm,, Journal of Global Optimization, 39 (2007), 459.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x.  Google Scholar

[9]

D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm,, Applied Soft Computing, 8 (2008), 687.  doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.007.  Google Scholar

[10]

D. Karaboga, Artificial bee colony algorithm,, Scholarpedia, 5 (2010).  doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.6915.  Google Scholar

[11]

L. Q. Meng and J. Q. Guo, Application of chaos particle swarm optimization algorithm to determination of water quality parameter of river steam,, Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 31 (2009), 169.   Google Scholar

[12]

J. P. Wang and S. T. Cheng, Application of genetic algorithm and simplex method in parameter identification of complicated environmental model,, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 36 (2005), 674.   Google Scholar

[13]

W. Wang, G. M. Zeng and L. He, Estimation of water quality model parameters with simulated annealing algorithm,, Shui Li Xue Bao, 6 (2004), 61.   Google Scholar

[14]

X. H. Yang, Z. F. Yang and J. Q. Li, A new method for parameter identification in water environment model,, Advances in Water Science, 14 (2003), 554.   Google Scholar

[15]

Y. J. Zhang, J. Q. Guo and H. S. Wang, Chaotic-Annealing algorithm for parameter identification of river water quality model,, China Rural Water and Hydropower, 1 (2006), 38.   Google Scholar

[16]

S. Zhu, G. H. Mao and G. H. Liu, Parameters identification of river water quality model based on finite volume method-hybrid genetic algorithm,, Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 26 (2007), 91.   Google Scholar

[1]

Xianbo Sun, Zhanbo Chen, Pei Yu. Parameter identification on Abelian integrals to achieve Chebyshev property. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020375
[2]

Wolfgang Riedl, Robert Baier, Matthias Gerdts. Optimization-based subdivision algorithm for reachable sets. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 99-130. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021005
[3]

Tien-Yu Lin, Bhaba R. Sarker, Chien-Jui Lin. An optimal setup cost reduction and lot size for economic production quantity model with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 467-484. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020043
[4]

Mohammed Abdulrazaq Kahya, Suhaib Abduljabbar Altamir, Zakariya Yahya Algamal. Improving whale optimization algorithm for feature selection with a time-varying transfer function. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 87-98. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020017
[5]

Guo Zhou, Yongquan Zhou, Ruxin Zhao. Hybrid social spider optimization algorithm with differential mutation operator for the job-shop scheduling problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 533-548. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019122
[6]

Bing Yu, Lei Zhang. Global optimization-based dimer method for finding saddle points. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 741-753. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020139
[7]

Mohamed Dellal, Bachir Bar. Global analysis of a model of competition in the chemostat with internal inhibitor. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 1129-1148. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020156
[8]

Hui Zhao, Zhengrong Liu, Yiren Chen. Global dynamics of a chemotaxis model with signal-dependent diffusion and sensitivity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021011
[9]

Shujing Shi, Jicai Huang, Yang Kuang. Global dynamics in a tumor-immune model with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 1149-1170. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020157
[10]

Yanhong Zhang. Global attractors of two layer baroclinic quasi-geostrophic model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021023
[11]

Ole Løseth Elvetun, Bjørn Fredrik Nielsen. A regularization operator for source identification for elliptic PDEs. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021006
[12]

Mahdi Karimi, Seyed Jafar Sadjadi. Optimization of a Multi-Item Inventory model for deteriorating items with capacity constraint using dynamic programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021013
[13]

Lu Xu, Chunlai Mu, Qiao Xin. Global boundedness of solutions to the two-dimensional forager-exploiter model with logistic source. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020396
[14]

Pedro Branco. A post-quantum UC-commitment scheme in the global random oracle model from code-based assumptions. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021, 15 (1) : 113-130. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020046
[15]

Robert Stephen Cantrell, King-Yeung Lam. Competitive exclusion in phytoplankton communities in a eutrophic water column. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020361
[16]

Bilal Al Taki, Khawla Msheik, Jacques Sainte-Marie. On the rigid-lid approximation of shallow water Bingham. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 875-905. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020146
[17]

Hong Fu, Mingwu Liu, Bo Chen. Supplier's investment in manufacturer's quality improvement with equity holding. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 649-668. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019127
[18]

Tomáš Bodnár, Philippe Fraunié, Petr Knobloch, Hynek Řezníček. Numerical evaluation of artificial boundary condition for wall-bounded stably stratified flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 785-801. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020333
[19]

Jiaquan Liu, Xiangqing Liu, Zhi-Qiang Wang. Sign-changing solutions for a parameter-dependent quasilinear equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020454
[20]

Chongyang Liu, Meijia Han, Zhaohua Gong, Kok Lay Teo. Robust parameter estimation for constrained time-delay systems with inexact measurements. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 317-337. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019113

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (58)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences