    • Previous Article
Rank-based inference for the accelerated failure time model in the presence of interval censored data
• NACO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
The soft landing problem for an infinite system of second order differential equations
March  2017, 7(1): 95-106. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017006

## Adaptive order of block backward differentiation formulas for stiff ODEs

 1 Institute for Mathematical Research, Department of Mathematics, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Malaysia 2 Department of Mathematics, Pusat Asasi Pertahanan, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 3 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 UiTM Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia 4 Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

* Corresponding author: Z. B. Ibrahim, Email Address: zarinabb@upm.edu.my

Received  June 2016 Revised  August 2016 Published  February 2017

In this paper, Adapative Order of Block Backward Differentiation Formulas (ABBDFs) are formulated using uniform step size for the numerical solution of stiff ordinary differential equations (ODEs). These ABBDF methods are of order four, five and six. The benefit of the ABBDF methods is the computation time in the computation of solutions. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate the advantage of implementing adaptive order selection in a single code.

Citation: Z. B. Ibrahim, N. A. A. Mohd Nasir, K. I. Othman, N. Zainuddin. Adaptive order of block backward differentiation formulas for stiff ODEs. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (1) : 95-106. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017006
##### References:
  L. G. Birta and O. Abou-Rabia, Parallel block predictor corrector methods for ODEs, IEEE Transactions on Computer, 36 (1987), 299-311.   Google Scholar  L. Chu and H. Hamilton, Parallel solution of ODEs by multi-block methods, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Computation, 8 (1987), 342-353.  doi: 10.1137/0908039.  Google Scholar  S. O. Fatunla, Numerical Methods for Initial Value Problems for Ordinary Differential equations 1st edition, U. S. A Academy Press, Boston, 1988. Google Scholar  P. J. Houwen and B. P. Sommeijer, Block Runge-Kutta Methods on Parallel Computers Report NM-R8906, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1989. Google Scholar  P. J. Houwen and B. P. Sommeijer, Block Runge-Kutta methods on parallel computers Report NM-R8906, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam. Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Implicit r-point block backward differentiation formula for solving first-order stiff ODEs, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186 (2007), 558-565.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.116.  Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Variable step size block backward differentiation formula for solving stiff ODEs, Proc. of World Congress on Engineering, LONDON, U.K, 2 (2007), 785-789.   Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, M. B. Suleiman and K. I. Othman, Fixed coefficients block backward differentiation formulas for the numerical solution of stiff ordinary differential equations, European Journal of Scientific Research, 21 (2008), 508-520.   Google Scholar  J. D. Lambert, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems 2nd edition, John Willey and Sons, New York, 1991. Google Scholar  N. E. Mastorakis, An extended Crank-Nicholson method and its Applications in the Solution of Partial Differential Equations: 1-D and 3-D Conduction Equations, 10th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics, (2006), 134-143. Google Scholar  Z. A. Majid, Parallel Block Methods for Solving Ordinary Differential Equations Ph. D thesis, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2004. Google Scholar  N. E. Mastorakis and O. Martin, About the numerical solution of a stationary transport equation, 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Optimization, (2005), 419-426.   Google Scholar  N. A. A. M. Nasir, Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Fifth order two-point block backward differentiation formulas for solving ordinary differential equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5 (2011), 3505-3518. Google Scholar  L. F. Shampine, Order selection in ODE codes based on implicit formulas, Applied Mathematics Letters, 4 (1991), 53-55.  doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(91)90168-U.  Google Scholar  L. F. Shampine and H. A. Watts, Block implicit one-step methods, Math. Comp., 23 (1969), 731-740. Google Scholar

show all references

##### References:
  L. G. Birta and O. Abou-Rabia, Parallel block predictor corrector methods for ODEs, IEEE Transactions on Computer, 36 (1987), 299-311.   Google Scholar  L. Chu and H. Hamilton, Parallel solution of ODEs by multi-block methods, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Computation, 8 (1987), 342-353.  doi: 10.1137/0908039.  Google Scholar  S. O. Fatunla, Numerical Methods for Initial Value Problems for Ordinary Differential equations 1st edition, U. S. A Academy Press, Boston, 1988. Google Scholar  P. J. Houwen and B. P. Sommeijer, Block Runge-Kutta Methods on Parallel Computers Report NM-R8906, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1989. Google Scholar  P. J. Houwen and B. P. Sommeijer, Block Runge-Kutta methods on parallel computers Report NM-R8906, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam. Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Implicit r-point block backward differentiation formula for solving first-order stiff ODEs, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186 (2007), 558-565.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.116.  Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Variable step size block backward differentiation formula for solving stiff ODEs, Proc. of World Congress on Engineering, LONDON, U.K, 2 (2007), 785-789.   Google Scholar  Z. B. Ibrahim, M. B. Suleiman and K. I. Othman, Fixed coefficients block backward differentiation formulas for the numerical solution of stiff ordinary differential equations, European Journal of Scientific Research, 21 (2008), 508-520.   Google Scholar  J. D. Lambert, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems 2nd edition, John Willey and Sons, New York, 1991. Google Scholar  N. E. Mastorakis, An extended Crank-Nicholson method and its Applications in the Solution of Partial Differential Equations: 1-D and 3-D Conduction Equations, 10th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics, (2006), 134-143. Google Scholar  Z. A. Majid, Parallel Block Methods for Solving Ordinary Differential Equations Ph. D thesis, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2004. Google Scholar  N. E. Mastorakis and O. Martin, About the numerical solution of a stationary transport equation, 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Optimization, (2005), 419-426.   Google Scholar  N. A. A. M. Nasir, Z. B. Ibrahim, K. I. Othman and M. B. Suleiman, Fifth order two-point block backward differentiation formulas for solving ordinary differential equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5 (2011), 3505-3518. Google Scholar  L. F. Shampine, Order selection in ODE codes based on implicit formulas, Applied Mathematics Letters, 4 (1991), 53-55.  doi: 10.1016/0893-9659(91)90168-U.  Google Scholar  L. F. Shampine and H. A. Watts, Block implicit one-step methods, Math. Comp., 23 (1969), 731-740. Google Scholar
Coefficients for ABBDF
 $k$ $y_{n-4}$ $y_{n-3}$ $y_{n-2}$ $y_{n-1}$ $y_{n}$ $y_{n+1}$ $y_{n+2}$ $f_{n+1}$ $f_{n+2}$ 4 0 0 $\frac{1}{10}$ $-\frac{3}{5}$ $\frac{9}{5}$ 1 $-\frac{3}{10}$ $\frac{12}{10}$ 0 0 0 $-\frac{3}{25}$ $\frac{16}{25}$ $-\frac{36}{25}$ $\frac{48}{25}$ 1 0 $\frac{12}{25}$ 5 0 $-\frac{3}{65}$ $\frac{4}{13}$ $-\frac{12}{13}$ $\frac{24}{13}$ 1 $\frac{12}{65}$ $\frac{12}{13}$ 0 0 $\frac{12}{137}$ $-\frac{75}{137}$ $\frac{200}{137}$ $-\frac{300}{137}$ $\frac{300}{137}$ 1 0 $\frac{16}{137}$ 6 $\frac{2}{77}$ -$\frac{15}{77}$ $\frac{50}{77}$ $-\frac{100}{77}$ $\frac{150}{77}$ 1 $-\frac{10}{77}$ $\frac{60}{77}$ 0 -$\frac{10}{147}$ $\frac{24}{49}$ $-\frac{75}{49}$ $\frac{400}{147}$ $-\frac{150}{49}$ $\frac{120}{49}$ 1 0 $\frac{60}{147}$
 $k$ $y_{n-4}$ $y_{n-3}$ $y_{n-2}$ $y_{n-1}$ $y_{n}$ $y_{n+1}$ $y_{n+2}$ $f_{n+1}$ $f_{n+2}$ 4 0 0 $\frac{1}{10}$ $-\frac{3}{5}$ $\frac{9}{5}$ 1 $-\frac{3}{10}$ $\frac{12}{10}$ 0 0 0 $-\frac{3}{25}$ $\frac{16}{25}$ $-\frac{36}{25}$ $\frac{48}{25}$ 1 0 $\frac{12}{25}$ 5 0 $-\frac{3}{65}$ $\frac{4}{13}$ $-\frac{12}{13}$ $\frac{24}{13}$ 1 $\frac{12}{65}$ $\frac{12}{13}$ 0 0 $\frac{12}{137}$ $-\frac{75}{137}$ $\frac{200}{137}$ $-\frac{300}{137}$ $\frac{300}{137}$ 1 0 $\frac{16}{137}$ 6 $\frac{2}{77}$ -$\frac{15}{77}$ $\frac{50}{77}$ $-\frac{100}{77}$ $\frac{150}{77}$ 1 $-\frac{10}{77}$ $\frac{60}{77}$ 0 -$\frac{10}{147}$ $\frac{24}{49}$ $-\frac{75}{49}$ $\frac{400}{147}$ $-\frac{150}{49}$ $\frac{120}{49}$ 1 0 $\frac{60}{147}$
Comparison between the ABBDF and BBDF for solving Problem 3.1
 $H$ Method MAXE TIME $10^{-2}$ BBDF(4) 5.34238e-6 0.008280686 BBDF(5) 8.60443e-6 0.008490485 BBDF(6) 1.09196e-5 0.0089108066 ABBDF 6.29854e-6 0.0082606264 $10^{-4}$ BBDF(4) 7.07097e-12 0.0145041159 BBDF(5) 3.99341e-11 0.01477376 BBDF(6) 5.75778e-11 0.01497369 ABBDF 2.51638e-11 0.014267131 $10^{-6}$ BBDF(4) 1.19693e-12 0.331891367 BBDF(5) 1.27653e-12 0.35464837 BBDF(6) 1.54599e-12 0.366591181 ABBDF 1.32749e-12 0.3299601339 $10^{-8}$ BBDF(4) 5.70600e-11 32.31383741 BBDF(5) 6.27814e-11 33.986499 BBDF(6) 8.38467e-11 35.61432122 ABBDF 6.87739e-11 32.222682490
 $H$ Method MAXE TIME $10^{-2}$ BBDF(4) 5.34238e-6 0.008280686 BBDF(5) 8.60443e-6 0.008490485 BBDF(6) 1.09196e-5 0.0089108066 ABBDF 6.29854e-6 0.0082606264 $10^{-4}$ BBDF(4) 7.07097e-12 0.0145041159 BBDF(5) 3.99341e-11 0.01477376 BBDF(6) 5.75778e-11 0.01497369 ABBDF 2.51638e-11 0.014267131 $10^{-6}$ BBDF(4) 1.19693e-12 0.331891367 BBDF(5) 1.27653e-12 0.35464837 BBDF(6) 1.54599e-12 0.366591181 ABBDF 1.32749e-12 0.3299601339 $10^{-8}$ BBDF(4) 5.70600e-11 32.31383741 BBDF(5) 6.27814e-11 33.986499 BBDF(6) 8.38467e-11 35.61432122 ABBDF 6.87739e-11 32.222682490
Comparison between the ABBDF and BBDF for solving Problem 3.2
 $H$ Method MAXE TIME $10^{-2}$ BBDF(4) 6.13882e+1 0.008227781 BBDF(5) 2.14167e-1 0.0082600851 BBDF(6) 2.96326e+0 0.00828741 ABBDF 1.44159e-2 0.008064681 $10^{-4}$ BBDF(4) 7.76160e-8 0.01543074 BBDF(5) 9.48795e-8 0.016383168 BBDF(6) 1.11123e-7 0.0171090074 ABBDF 7.76160e-8 0.0142214673 $10^{-6}$ BBDF(4) 1.93315e-11 2.97284740 BBDF(5) 1.07853e-11 3.12728618 BBDF(6) 2.66430e-11 3.8798845185 ABBDF 1.93315e-11 2.31853289 $10^{-8}$ BBDF(4) 2.35567e-9 84.36481221 BBDF(5) 4.41047e-10 85.76521578 BBDF(6) 2.59949e-9 87.69974205 ABBDF 2.35567e-9 84.36227574
 $H$ Method MAXE TIME $10^{-2}$ BBDF(4) 6.13882e+1 0.008227781 BBDF(5) 2.14167e-1 0.0082600851 BBDF(6) 2.96326e+0 0.00828741 ABBDF 1.44159e-2 0.008064681 $10^{-4}$ BBDF(4) 7.76160e-8 0.01543074 BBDF(5) 9.48795e-8 0.016383168 BBDF(6) 1.11123e-7 0.0171090074 ABBDF 7.76160e-8 0.0142214673 $10^{-6}$ BBDF(4) 1.93315e-11 2.97284740 BBDF(5) 1.07853e-11 3.12728618 BBDF(6) 2.66430e-11 3.8798845185 ABBDF 1.93315e-11 2.31853289 $10^{-8}$ BBDF(4) 2.35567e-9 84.36481221 BBDF(5) 4.41047e-10 85.76521578 BBDF(6) 2.59949e-9 87.69974205 ABBDF 2.35567e-9 84.36227574
Comparison between the ABBDF and mathod in  for solving Problem 3.3
 $H$ Method MAXE $10^{-3}$ BBDF(5) 7.43088e-3 BDF 4.97642e+43 ode15s 6.30000e-3 ABBDF 2.02095e-3 $10^{-5}$ BBDF(5) 7.68218e-4 BDF 7.88641e-4 ode15s 6.40000e-3 ABBDF 6.22269e-4 $10^{-7}$ BBDF(5) 8.09607e-8 BDF 8.39232e-8 ode15s 4.30000e-5 ABBDF 6.49214e-8
 $H$ Method MAXE $10^{-3}$ BBDF(5) 7.43088e-3 BDF 4.97642e+43 ode15s 6.30000e-3 ABBDF 2.02095e-3 $10^{-5}$ BBDF(5) 7.68218e-4 BDF 7.88641e-4 ode15s 6.40000e-3 ABBDF 6.22269e-4 $10^{-7}$ BBDF(5) 8.09607e-8 BDF 8.39232e-8 ode15s 4.30000e-5 ABBDF 6.49214e-8
  Jingwen Wu, Jintao Hu, Hongjiong Tian. Functionally-fitted block $\theta$-methods for ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020164  W. Sarlet, G. E. Prince, M. Crampin. Generalized submersiveness of second-order ordinary differential equations. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (2) : 209-221. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.209  Aeeman Fatima, F. M. Mahomed, Chaudry Masood Khalique. Conditional symmetries of nonlinear third-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 655-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018040  Alessandro Fonda, Fabio Zanolin. Bounded solutions of nonlinear second order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (1) : 91-98. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.91  Bin Wang, Arieh Iserles. Dirichlet series for dynamical systems of first-order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 281-298. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.281  Lijun Yi, Zhongqing Wang. Legendre spectral collocation method for second-order nonlinear ordinary/partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 299-322. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.299  Ben-Yu Guo, Zhong-Qing Wang. A spectral collocation method for solving initial value problems of first order ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (3) : 1029-1054. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1029  Wen Li, Song Wang, Volker Rehbock. A 2nd-order one-point numerical integration scheme for fractional ordinary differential equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 273-287. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017018  Angelo Favini, Yakov Yakubov. Regular boundary value problems for ordinary differential-operator equations of higher order in UMD Banach spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (3) : 595-614. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.595  Yanfei Lu, Qingfei Yin, Hongyi Li, Hongli Sun, Yunlei Yang, Muzhou Hou. Solving higher order nonlinear ordinary differential equations with least squares support vector machines. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-22. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019012  Bernard Dacorogna, Alessandro Ferriero. Regularity and selecting principles for implicit ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (1) : 87-101. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.87  Zvi Artstein. Averaging of ordinary differential equations with slowly varying averages. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 353-365. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.353  Feng Bao, Yanzhao Cao, Weidong Zhao. A first order semi-discrete algorithm for backward doubly stochastic differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (5) : 1297-1313. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1297  Dariusz Borkowski. Forward and backward filtering based on backward stochastic differential equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (2) : 305-325. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016002  Jasmina Djordjević, Svetlana Janković. Reflected backward stochastic differential equations with perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (4) : 1833-1848. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018075  Jan A. Van Casteren. On backward stochastic differential equations in infinite dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (3) : 803-824. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.803  Stefano Maset. Conditioning and relative error propagation in linear autonomous ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (7) : 2879-2909. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018165  Hongwei Lou, Weihan Wang. Optimal blowup/quenching time for controlled autonomous ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 517-527. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.517  Jean Mawhin, James R. Ward Jr. Guiding-like functions for periodic or bounded solutions of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2002, 8 (1) : 39-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.39  Iasson Karafyllis, Lars Grüne. Feedback stabilization methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (1) : 283-317. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.283

Impact Factor: