A type of new consensus protocol for two-dimension multi-agent systems

Yibo Zhang; Jinfeng Gao; Jia Ren; Huijiao Wang

doi:10.3934/naco.2017022

Article Contents

2017, Volume 7, Issue 3: 345-357. Doi: 10.3934/naco.2017022

This issue Previous Article Analysis of optimal boundary control for a three-dimensional reaction-diffusion system Next Article A multistage stochastic programming framework for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization

A type of new consensus protocol for two-dimension multi-agent systems

Institute of Automation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, P. R. China

* Corresponding author: Zhang Yibo
* Corresponding author: Zhang Yibo

The reviewing process of the paper was handled by Nanjing Huang as Guest Editors

Received: January 2016

Revised: June 2017

Published: October 2017

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61374083,61473264), Zhejiang Province Key Project of Science and Technology(No. 2014C03027), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LZ17F030002, LY17F030024).

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(15) Related Papers Cited by

Abstract

A type of new consensus protocol for a two-dimension multi-agent system (MAS) is proposed. By introducing the conventional MAS and protocol, a dynamic equation of the first-order two-dimension MAS is proposed. then a new protocol with its Laplacian matrix is adopted. According to two types possible roots of character equations, two lemmas are proposed to show consensus asymptotical conditions. Furthermore, the convergence conditions of parameters are analyzed. Several simulated examples illustrate that consensus is achieved if the convergence conditions are satisfied.

Keywords:

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3513A.

Citation:

FullText(HTML)

Figure 1. All possible of multiple results of $\bar{\mu} _{i\pm }$

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. A digraph without leaders

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. Simulation results 1 of condition (1) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. Simulation results 2 of condition (1) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. Simulation results 1 of condition (2) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 6. Simulation results 2 of condition (2) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 7. Simulation results 2 of condition (3) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 8. Simulation results of condition (3) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 9. Simulation results of condition (3) in Lemma 1

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 10. Simulation results 1 of condition (1) in Lemma 2

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 11. Simulation results 2 of condition (1) in Lemma 2

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 12. Simulation results 1 of condition (2) in Lemma 2

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 13. Simulation results 1 of condition (2) in Lemma 2

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 14. Simulation results if Lemma 1 is not hold

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Figure 15. Simulation results if Lemma 2 is not hold

Download: Full-size image PowerPoint slide

Related Papers

Cited by

References

[1]	Y. Y. Chen and Y. P. Tian, Directed coordinated control for multi-agent formation motion onaset of given curves, Acta Automatica Sinica, 35 (2009), 1541-1549. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2009.01541.
[2]	H. Huang, C. B. Yu and Q. H. Wu, Autonomous scale control of multi-agent formations with only shape constraints, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 23 (2013), 765-791. doi: 10.1002/rnc.2800.
[3]	A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin and A. S. Morse, Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,, 48 (2003), 2953-2958. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2003.812781.
[4]	Z. K. Li, X. D. Liu, W. Ren and L. H. Xie, Distributed tracking control for linear multi-agent systems with a leader of bounded unknown input, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58 (2013), 518-523. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2012.2208295.
[5]	Z. Y. Lin, L. L. Wang, Z. M. Han and M. Y. Fu, Distributed formation control of multi-Agent systems using complex Laplacian, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 59 (2014), 1765-1777. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2309031.
[6]	C. Q. Ma and J. F. Zhang, Necessary and sufficient conditions for consensus ability of linear multi-agent systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55 (2010), 1263-1268. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2042764.
[7]	W. Ren and E. Atkins, Distributed multi-vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 17 (2007), 1002-1033. doi: 10.1002/rnc.1147.
[8]	W. Yu and Y. F. Zheng, Dynamic behavior of multi-agent systems with distributed sampled control, Acta Automatica Sinica, 38 (2012), 357-365. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2012.00357.