American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Imperfection with inspection policy and variable demand under trade-credit: A deteriorating inventory model
  • NACO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Numerical comparisons of smoothing functions for optimal correction of an infeasible system of absolute value equations
doi: 10.3934/naco.2019035

Characterization of efficient solutions for a class of PDE-constrained vector control problems

Savin Treanţă

University Politehnica of Bucharest, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Applied Mathematics, 313 Splaiul Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Received  October 2018 Revised  March 2019 Published  May 2019

In this paper, we define a V-KT-pseudoinvex multidimensional vector control problem. More precisely, we introduce a new condition on the functionals which are involved in a multidimensional multiobjective (vector) control problem and we prove that a V-KT-pseudoinvex multidimensional vector control problem is characterized so that all Kuhn-Tucker points are efficient solutions. Also, the theoretical results derived in this paper are illustrated with an application.

Keywords: Multidimensional vector control problem, Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions, V-KT-pseudoinvexity, multiple integral cost functional, flow.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 26B25, 65K10, 90C29; Secondary: 90C30, 49K20, 46T20, 58J32.
Citation: Savin Treanţă. Characterization of efficient solutions for a class of PDE-constrained vector control problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, doi: 10.3934/naco.2019035
References:
[1]

V. M. Alekseev, M. V. Tikhomirov and S. V. Fomin, Commande Optimale, Mir, Moscow, 1982. Google Scholar

[2]

M. Arana-Jiménez, R. Osuna-Gómez, A. Rufián-Lizana and G. Ruiz-Garzón, KT-invex control problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 489-496. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.064. Google Scholar

[3]

F. Cardin and C. Viterbo, Commuting Hamiltonians and Hamilton-Jacobi multi-time equations, Duke Math. J., 144 (2008), 235-284. doi: 10.1215/00127094-2008-036. Google Scholar

[4]

D. A. Deckert and L. Nickel, Consistency of multi-time Dirac equations with general interaction potentials, J. Math. Phys., 57 (2016), 072301. doi: 10.1063/1.4954947. Google Scholar

[5]

P. A. M. Dirac, V. A. Fock and B. Podolski, On quantum electrodynamics, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 2 (1932), 468-479. Google Scholar

[6]

A. Friedman, The Cauchy problem in several time variables, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics (Indiana Univ. Math. J.), 11 (1962), 859-889. Google Scholar

[7]

S. Keppeler and M. Sieber, Particle creation and annihilation at interior boundaries: One-dimensional models, Preprint, arXiv: 1511.03071. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/125204. Google Scholar

[8]

W. S. Kendall, Contours of Brownian processes with several-dimensional times, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 52 (1980), 267-276. doi: 10.1007/BF00538891. Google Scholar

[9]

M. Lienert and L. Nickel, A simple explicitly solvable interacting relativistic $N$-particle model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 48 (2015), 325301. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/32/325301. Google Scholar

[10]

D. H. Martin, The essence of invexity, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 47 (1985), 65-76. doi: 10.1007/BF00941316. Google Scholar

[11]

Şt. Mititelu and S. Treanţă, Efficiency conditions in vector control problems governed by multiple integrals, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 57 (2018), 647-665. doi: 10.1007/s12190-017-1126-z. Google Scholar

[12]

B. Mond and M. A. Hanson, Duality for control problems, SIAM J. Control, 6 (1968), 114-120. Google Scholar

[13]

B. Mond and I. Smart, Duality and sufficiency in control problems with invexity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 136 (1988), 325-333. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90135-7. Google Scholar

[14]

M. Motta and F. Rampazzo, Nonsmooth multi-time Hamilton-Jacobi systems, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 55 (2006), 1573-1614. doi: 10.1512/iumj.2006.55.2760. Google Scholar

[15]

S. Petrat and R. Tumulka, Multi-time wave functions for quantum field theory, Ann. Phys., 345 (2014), 17-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2014.03.004. Google Scholar

[16]

V. Preda, On duality and sufficiency in control problems with general invexity, Bull. Math. de la Soc. Sci. Math de Roumanie, 35 (1991), 271-280. Google Scholar

[17]

V. Prepeliţă, Stability of a class of multidimensional continuous-discrete linear systems, Math. Reports, 9 (2007), 387-398. Google Scholar

[18]

D. J. Saunders, The Geometry of Jet Bundles, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series, 142 (1989), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511526411. Google Scholar

[19]

S. Teufel and R. Tumulka, New type of Hamiltonians without ultraviolet divergence for quantum field theories, Preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04847v1.Google Scholar

[20]

S. Tomonaga, On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1 (1946), 27-42. doi: 10.1080/10724117.1994.11974884. Google Scholar

[21]

S. Treanţă, PDEs of Hamilton-Pfaff type via multi-time optimization problems, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A: Appl. Math. Phys., 76 (2014), 163-168. Google Scholar

[22]

S. Treanţă, Optimal control problems on higher order jet bundles, The Intern. Conf. "Differential Geometry - Dynamical Systems", October 10-13, 2013, Bucharest-Romania, Balkan Society of Geometers, Geometry Balkan Press (2014), 181–192. Google Scholar

[23]

S. Treanţă, Multiobjective fractional variational problem on higher-order jet bundles, Commun. Math. Stat., 4 (2016), 323-340. doi: 10.1007/s40304-016-0087-0. Google Scholar

[24]

S. Treanţă, Higher-order Hamilton dynamics and Hamilton-Jacobi divergence PDE, Comput. Math. Appl., 75 (2018), 547-560. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.033. Google Scholar

[25]

S. Treanţă and M. Arana-Jiménez, KT-pseudoinvex multidimensional control problem, Optim. Control Appl. Meth., 39 (2018), 1291-1300. doi: 10.1002/oca.2410. Google Scholar

[26]

S. Treanţă and M. Arana-Jiménez, On generalized KT-pseudoinvex control problems involving multiple integral functionals, Eur. J. Control, 43 (2018), 39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2018.05.004. Google Scholar

[27]

S. Treanţă, On a new class of vector variational control problems, Numer. Func. Anal. Opt., 39 (2018), 1594-1603. doi: 10.1080/01630563.2018.1488142. Google Scholar

[28]

C. Udrişte and I. Ţevy, Multitime dynamic programming for multiple integral actions, J. Glob. Optim., 51 (2011), 345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10898-010-9599-4. Google Scholar

[29]

G-W. Weber, F. Yilmaz, H.Ö. Bakan and E. Savku, Approximation of Optimal Stochastic Control Problems for Multi-dimensional Stochastic Differential Equations by Using Itô-Taylor Method with Malliavin Calculus, The 9th International Conference on Optimization: Techniques and Applications, Taipei, Taiwan, 2013.Google Scholar

[30]

N. I. Yurchuk, A partially characteristic mixed boundary value problem with Goursat initial conditions for linear equations with two-dimensional time, Diff. Uravn., 5 (1969), 898-910. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

V. M. Alekseev, M. V. Tikhomirov and S. V. Fomin, Commande Optimale, Mir, Moscow, 1982. Google Scholar

[2]

M. Arana-Jiménez, R. Osuna-Gómez, A. Rufián-Lizana and G. Ruiz-Garzón, KT-invex control problem, Appl. Math. Comput., 197 (2008), 489-496. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.064. Google Scholar

[3]

F. Cardin and C. Viterbo, Commuting Hamiltonians and Hamilton-Jacobi multi-time equations, Duke Math. J., 144 (2008), 235-284. doi: 10.1215/00127094-2008-036. Google Scholar

[4]

D. A. Deckert and L. Nickel, Consistency of multi-time Dirac equations with general interaction potentials, J. Math. Phys., 57 (2016), 072301. doi: 10.1063/1.4954947. Google Scholar

[5]

P. A. M. Dirac, V. A. Fock and B. Podolski, On quantum electrodynamics, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 2 (1932), 468-479. Google Scholar

[6]

A. Friedman, The Cauchy problem in several time variables, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics (Indiana Univ. Math. J.), 11 (1962), 859-889. Google Scholar

[7]

S. Keppeler and M. Sieber, Particle creation and annihilation at interior boundaries: One-dimensional models, Preprint, arXiv: 1511.03071. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/125204. Google Scholar

[8]

W. S. Kendall, Contours of Brownian processes with several-dimensional times, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 52 (1980), 267-276. doi: 10.1007/BF00538891. Google Scholar

[9]

M. Lienert and L. Nickel, A simple explicitly solvable interacting relativistic $N$-particle model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 48 (2015), 325301. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/48/32/325301. Google Scholar

[10]

D. H. Martin, The essence of invexity, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 47 (1985), 65-76. doi: 10.1007/BF00941316. Google Scholar

[11]

Şt. Mititelu and S. Treanţă, Efficiency conditions in vector control problems governed by multiple integrals, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 57 (2018), 647-665. doi: 10.1007/s12190-017-1126-z. Google Scholar

[12]

B. Mond and M. A. Hanson, Duality for control problems, SIAM J. Control, 6 (1968), 114-120. Google Scholar

[13]

B. Mond and I. Smart, Duality and sufficiency in control problems with invexity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 136 (1988), 325-333. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90135-7. Google Scholar

[14]

M. Motta and F. Rampazzo, Nonsmooth multi-time Hamilton-Jacobi systems, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 55 (2006), 1573-1614. doi: 10.1512/iumj.2006.55.2760. Google Scholar

[15]

S. Petrat and R. Tumulka, Multi-time wave functions for quantum field theory, Ann. Phys., 345 (2014), 17-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2014.03.004. Google Scholar

[16]

V. Preda, On duality and sufficiency in control problems with general invexity, Bull. Math. de la Soc. Sci. Math de Roumanie, 35 (1991), 271-280. Google Scholar

[17]

V. Prepeliţă, Stability of a class of multidimensional continuous-discrete linear systems, Math. Reports, 9 (2007), 387-398. Google Scholar

[18]

D. J. Saunders, The Geometry of Jet Bundles, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series, 142 (1989), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511526411. Google Scholar

[19]

S. Teufel and R. Tumulka, New type of Hamiltonians without ultraviolet divergence for quantum field theories, Preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04847v1.Google Scholar

[20]

S. Tomonaga, On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1 (1946), 27-42. doi: 10.1080/10724117.1994.11974884. Google Scholar

[21]

S. Treanţă, PDEs of Hamilton-Pfaff type via multi-time optimization problems, U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A: Appl. Math. Phys., 76 (2014), 163-168. Google Scholar

[22]

S. Treanţă, Optimal control problems on higher order jet bundles, The Intern. Conf. "Differential Geometry - Dynamical Systems", October 10-13, 2013, Bucharest-Romania, Balkan Society of Geometers, Geometry Balkan Press (2014), 181–192. Google Scholar

[23]

S. Treanţă, Multiobjective fractional variational problem on higher-order jet bundles, Commun. Math. Stat., 4 (2016), 323-340. doi: 10.1007/s40304-016-0087-0. Google Scholar

[24]

S. Treanţă, Higher-order Hamilton dynamics and Hamilton-Jacobi divergence PDE, Comput. Math. Appl., 75 (2018), 547-560. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.033. Google Scholar

[25]

S. Treanţă and M. Arana-Jiménez, KT-pseudoinvex multidimensional control problem, Optim. Control Appl. Meth., 39 (2018), 1291-1300. doi: 10.1002/oca.2410. Google Scholar

[26]

S. Treanţă and M. Arana-Jiménez, On generalized KT-pseudoinvex control problems involving multiple integral functionals, Eur. J. Control, 43 (2018), 39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2018.05.004. Google Scholar

[27]

S. Treanţă, On a new class of vector variational control problems, Numer. Func. Anal. Opt., 39 (2018), 1594-1603. doi: 10.1080/01630563.2018.1488142. Google Scholar

[28]

C. Udrişte and I. Ţevy, Multitime dynamic programming for multiple integral actions, J. Glob. Optim., 51 (2011), 345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10898-010-9599-4. Google Scholar

[29]

G-W. Weber, F. Yilmaz, H.Ö. Bakan and E. Savku, Approximation of Optimal Stochastic Control Problems for Multi-dimensional Stochastic Differential Equations by Using Itô-Taylor Method with Malliavin Calculus, The 9th International Conference on Optimization: Techniques and Applications, Taipei, Taiwan, 2013.Google Scholar

[30]

N. I. Yurchuk, A partially characteristic mixed boundary value problem with Goursat initial conditions for linear equations with two-dimensional time, Diff. Uravn., 5 (1969), 898-910. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Graphical illustrations for x(t) and u(t)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Piernicola Bettiol, Nathalie Khalil. Necessary optimality conditions for average cost minimization problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2093-2124. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019086
[2]

Tadeusz Antczak, Najeeb Abdulaleem. Optimality conditions for $ E $-differentiable vector optimization problems with the multiple interval-valued objective function. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-19. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019089
[3]

Ying Gao, Xinmin Yang, Kok Lay Teo. Optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (2) : 483-496. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.483
[4]

Adela Capătă. Optimality conditions for vector equilibrium problems and their applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (3) : 659-669. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.659
[5]

Qiu-Sheng Qiu. Optimality conditions for vector equilibrium problems with constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 783-790. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.783
[6]

Thierry Horsin, Peter I. Kogut, Olivier Wilk. Optimal $L^2$-control problem in coefficients for a linear elliptic equation. II. Approximation of solutions and optimality conditions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (4) : 595-628. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016017
[7]

Ciro D'Apice, Olha P. Kupenko, Rosanna Manzo. On boundary optimal control problem for an arterial system: First-order optimality conditions. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (4) : 585-607. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018027
[8]

Vladimir Gaitsgory, Alex Parkinson, Ilya Shvartsman. Linear programming based optimality conditions and approximate solution of a deterministic infinite horizon discounted optimal control problem in discrete time. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1743-1767. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018235
[9]

Shuxing Chen, Gui-Qiang Chen, Zejun Wang, Dehua Wang. A multidimensional piston problem for the Euler equations for compressible flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (2) : 361-383. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.361
[10]

Shahlar F. Maharramov. Necessary optimality conditions for switching control problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 47-55. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.47
[11]

Vladimir Srochko, Vladimir Antonik, Elena Aksenyushkina. Sufficient optimality conditions for extremal controls based on functional increment formulas. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (2) : 191-199. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017013
[12]

Adela Capătă. Optimality conditions for strong vector equilibrium problems under a weak constraint qualification. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 563-574. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.563
[13]

Andrei V. Dmitruk, Nikolai P. Osmolovski. Necessary conditions for a weak minimum in a general optimal control problem with integral equations on a variable time interval. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (4) : 507-535. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017019
[14]

Henri Bonnel, Ngoc Sang Pham. Nonsmooth optimization over the (weakly or properly) Pareto set of a linear-quadratic multi-objective control problem: Explicit optimality conditions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 789-809. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.789
[15]

Yujing Wang, Changjun Yu, Kok Lay Teo. A new computational strategy for optimal control problem with a cost on changing control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (3) : 339-364. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016016
[16]

Lucas Bonifacius, Ira Neitzel. Second order optimality conditions for optimal control of quasilinear parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 1-34. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018001
[17]

Miniak-Górecka Alicja, Nowakowski Andrzej. Sufficient optimality conditions for a class of epidemic problems with control on the boundary. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 263-275. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017017
[18]

Lihua Li, Yan Gao, Hongjie Wang. Second order sufficient optimality conditions for hybrid control problems with state jump. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 329-343. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.329
[19]

Sofia O. Lopes, Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, Maria do Rosário de Pinho. On constraint qualifications for nondegenerate necessary conditions of optimality applied to optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (2) : 559-575. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.559
[20]

Monika Laskawy. Optimality conditions of the first eigenvalue of a fourth order Steklov problem. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (5) : 1843-1859. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017089

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (22)
  • HTML views (157)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences