\`x^2+y_1+z_12^34\`
Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

Solving nonlinear differential equations using hybrid method between Lyapunov's artificial small parameter and continuous particle swarm optimization

  • *Corresponding author

    *Corresponding author 
Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(0) / Table(6) Related Papers Cited by
  • In this paper, Lyapunov's artificial small parameter method (LASPM) with continuous particle swarm optimization (CPSO) is presented and used for solving nonlinear differential equations. The proposed method, LASPM-CPSO, is based on estimating the $ \varepsilon $ parameter in LASPM through a PSO algorithm and based on a proposed objective function. Three different examples are used to evaluate the proposed method LASPM-CPSO, and compare it with the classical method LASPM through different intervals of the domain. The results from the maximum absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) obtained through the given examples show the reliability and efficiency of the proposed LASPM-CPSO method, compared to the classical method LASPM.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C35.

    Citation:

    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Table 1.  Maximum absolute error (MAE) for example 1

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MAE MAE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $1+1.98E-05$ $3.60E-05$ $3.79E-05$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $1+1.98E-05$ $3.60E-05$ $3.79E-05$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $1+2.00E-06$ $3.77E-05$ $3.79E-05$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1+2.60E-09$ $1.26E-08$ $1.27E-08$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1+2.50E-09$ $1.26E-08$ $1.27E-08$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $1+3.10E-07$ $8.34E-07$ $8.45E-07$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $1+2.60E-09$ $1.93E-09$ $1.95E-09$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $1+3.10E-07$ $8.34E-07$ $8.45E-07$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 2.  Mean squared error (MSE) for example 1

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MSE MSE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $1+1.98E-05$ $1.26E-10$ $1.41E-10$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $1+1.98E-05$ $8.67E-11$ $9.72E-11$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $1+2.00E-06$ $7.32E-11$ $7.41E-11$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1+2.60E-09$ $2.68E-17$ $2.70E-17$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1+2.50E-09$ $1.50E-17$ $1.51E-17$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $1+3.10E-07$ $5.17E-14$ $5.33E-14$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $1+2.60E-09$ $6.29E-19$ $6.47E-19$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $1+3.10E-07$ $7.51E-14$ $7.78E-14$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 3.  Maximum absolute error for example 2

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MAE MAE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $1.28E-03$ $3.20E-03$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $1+1.22E-03$ $1.33E-03$ $3.20E-03$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $1.28E-03$ $3.20E-03$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $4.23E-07$ $1.30E-06$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $4.23E-07$ $1.30E-06$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $1+1.22E-03$ $1.33E-03$ $3.20E-03$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $4.17E-07$ $1.30E-06$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $1.28E-03$ $3.20E-03$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 4.  Mean squared error (MSE) for example 2

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MSE MSE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $3.12E-07$ $1.01E-06$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $1+1.22E-03$ $2.25E-07$ $6.95E-07$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $3.27E-07$ $1.06E-06$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $7.62E-14$ $2.84E-13$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $8.31E-14$ $3.10E-13$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $1+1.22E-03$ $2.25E-07$ $6.95E-07$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $1+3.23E-06$ $7.62E-14$ $2.84E-13$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $1+1.25E-03$ $3.12E-07$ $1.01E-06$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 5.  Maximum absolute error for example 3

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MAE MAE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $0.9969649575$ $4.77E-03$ $6.90E-03$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $0.9974640403$ $5.12E-03$ $6.90E-03$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $0.9960515183$ $6.36E-03$ $9.16E-03$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1.0004736382$ $3.69E-05$ $2.44E-04$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1.0002174260$ $1.62E-04 $ $2.44E-04$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $0.9960267479$ $6.34E-03$ $9.16E-03$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $0.9999618650$ $4.83E-05$ $6.52E-05$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $0.9951507666$ $5.72E-03$ $9.16E-03$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 6.  Mean squared error (MSE) for example 3

    Domain Proposed Method LASPM, $\varepsilon =1$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $\varepsilon $ MSE MSE
    $\left[ -1,0\right] $ $0.9969649575$ $3.27E-06$ $5.22E-06$
    $\left[ -1,0.5\right] $ $0.9974640403$ $2.47E-06$ $3.59E-06$
    $\left[ -1,1\right] $ $0.9960515183$ $4.50E-06$ $7.97E-06$
    $\left[ -0.5,0\right] $ $1.0004736382$ $6.48E-10$ $1.80E-08$
    $\left[ -0.5,0.5\right] $ $1.0002174260$ $6.28E-09 $ $1.03E-08$
    $\left[ -0.5,1\right] $ $0.9960267479$ $4.10E-06$ $6.88E-06$
    $\left[ 0,0.5\right] $ $0.9999618650$ $7.32E-10$ $8.45E-10$
    $\left[ 0,1\right] $ $0.9951507666$ $4.96E-06$ $9.99E-06$
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1] G. AdomianNonlinear Stochastic Operator Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1986.  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-044375-8.50024-1.
    [2] G. Adomian, Nonlinear Stochastic Systems Theory and Applications to Physics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2569-4.
    [3] G. Adomian, Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-8289-6.
    [4] K. Ahmad, A. Qaiser and A. H. Soori, Nonlinear least squares solutions of ordinary differential equations, Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg, 2 (2020).
    [5] Y. Aksoy and M. Pakdemirli, New perturbation solutions for Bratu-type equtions, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 59 (2010), 2802-2808.  doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.01.050.
    [6] W. Al-HayaniL. Alzubaidy and A. Entesar, Solutions of singular IVP's of Lane-Emden type by Homotopy analysis method with genetic algorithm, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 11 (2017), 1-10. 
    [7] N. A. Al-Thanoon, O. S. Qasim and Z. Y. Algamal, Tuning parameter estimation in SCAD-support vector machine using firefly algorithm with application in gene selection and cancer classification, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2018.
    [8] I. V. AndrianovJ. Awrejcewicz and A. Ivankov, Artificial small parameter method-solving mixed boundary value problems, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2005 (2005), 325-340.  doi: 10.1155/MPE.2005.325.
    [9] M. Babaei, A general approach to approximate solutions of nonlinear differential equations using particle swarm optimization, Applied Soft Computing, 13 (2013), 3354-3365. 
    [10] N. DelgarmB. SajadiF. Kowsary and S. Delgarm, Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO), Applied Energy, 170 (2016), 293-303. 
    [11] S. Deniz and N. Bildik, Optimal perturbation iteration method for Bratu-type problems, Journal of King Saud University-Science, 30 (2018), 91-99. 
    [12] A. Entesar, O. Saber and W. Al-Hayani, Hybridization of genetic algorithm with homotopy analysis method for solving fractional partial differential equations, Eurasian Journal of Science & Engineering, 4 (2019).
    [13] J.-H. He, Homotopy perturbation technique, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 178 (1999), 257-262.  doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00018-3.
    [14] J.-H. He, Variational iteration method-a kind of non-linear analytical technique: some examples, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 34 (1999), 699-708. 
    [15] S. Liao, Beyond Perturbation-Introduction to the Homotopy Analysis Method, CRC Press LLC, 2004.
    [16] S. Liao, Homotopy Analysis Method in Nonlinear Differential Equations, Springer, 2012.
    [17] A. M. Lyapunov, General Problem on Stability of Motion, Taylor & Francis, London, 1992. doi: 10.1080/00207179208934253.
    [18] A. M. Lyapunov, The general problem of the stability of motion, Int. J. Control, 553 (1992), 531-534.  doi: 10.1080/00207179208934253.
    [19] O. Moaaz, I. Dassios, O. Bazighifan and A. Muhib, Oscillation theorems for nonlinear differential equations of fourth-order, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 520. doi: 10.3934/math.2020414.
    [20] A. H. Nayfeh, Perturbation Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000. doi: 10.1002/9783527617609.
    [21] A. Ouyang, Y. Zhou and Q. Luo, Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving systems of nonlinear equations, in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, (2009), 460–465.
    [22] O. S. Qasim and Z. Y. Algamal, Feature selection using particle swarm optimization-based logistic regression model, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 182 (2018), 41-46. 
    [23] M. S. Rawashdeh and S. Maitama, Solving nonlinear ordinary differential equations using the NDM, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 5 (2015), 77-88.  doi: 10.11948/2015007.
    [24] Y. Shi, Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources, in Evolutionary Computation, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress (2001), 81–86.
    [25] Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, Parameter selection in particle swarm optimization, in International Conference on Evolutionary Programming, (1998), 591–600.
    [26] X. Zhang and S. Liang, Adomian decomposition method is a special case of Lyapunov's artificial small parameter method, Applied Mathematics Letters, 48 (2015), 177–179. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2015.04.011.
  • 加载中

Tables(6)

SHARE

Article Metrics

HTML views(2184) PDF downloads(422) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return