\`x^2+y_1+z_12^34\`
Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

Mathematical modeling of natural resource and human interaction: Applications to the harvesting of Pacific Yew for cancer treatment

  • *Corresponding author: Yun Kang

    *Corresponding author: Yun Kang
Abstract / Introduction Full Text(HTML) Figure(8) / Table(4) Related Papers Cited by
  • Natural resources such as terrestrial plants and marine sponges have played a dominant role in deriving anticancer compounds for cancer treatments including chemotherapy. Unfortunately, without proper regulation of society's resource needs, we risk depleting natural resources due to overexploitation, which could lead to the collapse of ecosystems. To address this issue, we present a modeling framework employing ordinary differential equations to study the dynamics of the interaction between human needs and natural resource motivated by the native species of North America: the Pacific Yew tree. Our analytical results demonstrate how human behavior such as the harvesting rate of the resource may lead to different dynamical scenarios such as cancer-free, resource depletion, and/or multiple attractors; and the mechanisms of generating backward bifurcations. Our bifurcation analysis results and the application to the data suggests that the resource can sustain cancer patient populations with low harvesting rates, or endure higher rates to support a smaller portion of cancer patients. Our framework sheds light on the sustainable coexistence of natural resources and drug production and indicate the future work of incorporating optimal control strategies is needed. By exploring the dynamics of population interactions, we identify key factors influencing the preservation of natural resources while meeting the demand for cancer treatment. These insights contribute to understanding ecological impacts and offer strategies for the sustainable utilization of natural resources in addressing critical public health challenges.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34H05, 37N25, 92-10.

    Citation:

    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Nullclines $ nf_1(P) $ and $ nf_2(P) $ for Model (1), illustrating the existence of no interior equilibria (subfigures a and b), one interior equilibrium (subfigures c and d, $ \mathbf{E_1} $), and two interior equilibria (subfigure e, $ \mathbf{E_1} $ and $ \mathbf{E_2} $). The orange dot marks the intersection(s) of the nullclines, indicating the number of interior equilibria. The following parameter values were used: $ r_P = 0.7 $, $ r_C = 0.3 $, $ K_P = 10 $, and $ q = 0.1 $

    Figure 2.  One parameter bifurcation for Model (1) as a function of the bifurcation parameter $ \alpha $ (resource's removal rate). Figures (a)-(c) are an example of the backward bifurcation that Model (1) undergoes at $ \alpha = \frac{r_P}{K_C} $. Parameter values used in figures (a)-(c) are: $ r_P = 0.7 $, $ r_C = 3.4 $, $ K_P = 9.5 $, $ K_C = 1 $, $ \beta = 0.4 $, $ q = 0.5 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. Figures (d)-(f) are a simulated example when Model (1) has a cancer-free population and we have natural resource persistance. Parameter values used in figures (d)-(f) are: $ r_P = 2.6 $, $ r_C = 0.9 $, $ K_P = 2 $, $ K_C = 0.9 $, $ \beta = 1.5 $, $ q = 1 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. The diagram shows the boundary and interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points

    Figure 3.  One parameter bifurcation for Model (1) as a function of the bifurcation parameter $ \beta $ (effort needed to harvest the natural resource and process treatment). This is an example of the forward bifurcation that Model (1) undergoes at $ \beta = \frac{q \alpha}{r_C}-\frac{1}{K_P} $. Parameter values used are: $ r_P = 0.42447 $, $ r_C = 0.043 $, $ K_P = 10 $, $ K_C = 5 $, $ \alpha = 0.6 $, $ \beta = 5 $, $ q = 0.1 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. The diagram shows the boundary and interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points

    Figure 4.  One parameter bifurcation for Model (1) as a function of the bifurcation parameter $ r_C $ (cancer patients max growth rate). Parameter values used are: $ r_P = 0.7 $, $ K_P = 9.5 $, $ K_C = 1.6 $, $ \alpha = 3.4 $, $ \beta = 0.4 $, $ q = 0.5 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. The diagram shows the interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points

    Figure 5.  One parameter bifurcation for Model (1) as a function of the bifurcation parameter $ r_P $ (resource maximum growth rate). Parameter values used are: $ r_C = 0.043 $, $ K_P = 10 $, $ K_C = 5 $, $ \alpha = 0.6 $, $ \beta = 5 $, $ q = 0.1 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. The diagram shows the interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points

    Figure 6.  One parameter bifurcation for Model (1) as a function of the bifurcation parameter $ q $ (conversion of cancer patients to recovered individuals due to treatment derived from natural resource). Parameter values used are: $ r_P = 0.42447 $, $ r_C = 0.043 $, $ K_P = 10 $, $ K_C = 5 $, $ \alpha = 0.6 $, $ \beta = 5 $, and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $. The diagram shows the interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points

    Figure 7.  Time series of the sum of lung, ovarian and breast cancer patients with the prevalence of cancer patients. All data was obtained from the Global Health Data Exchange [39]. We also show the best fit our model to the available data. The grey shaded section represents the first sectional fitting, while the green shaded section represents the second sectional fitting

    Figure 8.  Figure (a) is a 3D bifurcation for parameters $ \alpha $, $ \beta $ and $ q $. Figure (b) is a 2D bifurcation for parameters $ \alpha $ and $ \beta $. The red and black markers represent the change of two and one interior equilibria, respectively. Figure (c) and (d) is a 1D bifurcation with respect to parameter $ \alpha $. This diagram shows the interior equilibria of the system, where blue represents stable equilibria and green indicates saddle points. Any empty area in each figure indicates no interior equilibrium in the system

    Table 1.  Biological meaning of parameters from the model

    Parameter Description Units
    $ r_P $ Natural resource's max growth rate year$ ^{-1} $
    $ r_C $ Cancer patients max growth rate year$ ^{-1} $
    $ K_P $ Natural resource's carrying capacity units$ ^* $
    $ K_C $ Cancer patients carrying capacity indv
    $ \alpha $ Rate of natural resource removal caused by cancer patients in need of treatment (indv$ \cdot $year)$ ^{-1} $
    $ \beta $ Effort needed to harvest the natural resource and process treatment units$ ^{-1} $
    $ q $ Conversion of cancer patients to recovered individuals due to treatment derived from natural resource indv$ \cdot $units$ ^{-1} $
    $ \mu_R $ Per capita death rate indv$ \cdot $year$ ^{-1} $
    $^*$ Note: units in parameters $K_P$, $\beta$, and $q$ represent the units of natural resource (e.g., tree, plant).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 2.  Summary of boundary equilibrium dynamics

    Equilibrium Existence Stability
    $ \mathbf{E_{0, 0, 0}} $ Always Always unstable.
    $ \mathbf{E_{P^*, 0, 0}}=(K_P, 0, 0) $ Always LAS when $ \alpha>\frac{r_C(1+\beta K_P)}{q K_P} $, otherwise it is unstable.
    $ \mathbf{E_{0, C^*, 0}}=(0, K_C, 0) $ Always LAS when $ \alpha>\frac{r_P}{K_C} $, otherwise it is unstable.
    LAS: locally asymptotically stable.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 3.  Biological meaning of parameters from the model

    Parameter Description Value Reference
    $ r_P $ Natural resource's max growth rate [0.033, 0.055] [11,5,56,57]
    $ r_C $ Cancer patients max growth rate estimated
    $ K_P $ Natural resource's carrying capacity 14, 000, 000 [4,37]
    $ K_C $ Cancer patients carrying capacity 214, 809, 394 [8]
    $ \alpha $ Rate of natural resource removal caused by cancer patients in need of treatment estimated
    $ \beta $ Effort needed to harvest the natural resource and process treatment estimated
    $ q $ Conversion of cancer patients to recovered individuals due to treatment derived from natural resource estimated
    $ \mu_R $$ ^* $ Per capita death rate 0.006 [20]
    *Represents rates per 100, 000 people.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 4.  Fitted parameter estimations of five parameters of Model (1). Fixed parameter values: $ r_P = 0.055 $, $ K_P = 14000000 $ and $ \mu_R = 0.006 $

    Fitting Section Parameter All Cancer Data
    1 $ r_C $ 0.0273
    $ K_C $ 214 809 394
    2 $ \alpha $ 0.3706
    $ \beta $ 68.4731
    $ q $ 3.3207
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1] R. Bashyal, Engaging communities in the conservation of wild maire's yews in nepal - conservation leadership programme, Conservation Leadership Programme (Website), https://www.conservationleadershipprogramme.org/project/engaging-communities-maires-yews-nepal/, 2019.
    [2] G. Bhatt, R. Poudel, T. Pandey and R. Basnet, Yews of nepal, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories (NHPL), Godawari, Lalitpur.
    [3] E. N. BodineS. Lenhart and  L. J. GrossMathematics for the Life Sciences, Princeton University Press, 2014. 
    [4] C. L. Bolsinger and A. E. Jaramillo, Taxus brevifolia nutt, In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, Technical Coordinators. Silvics of North America, Vol. 1. Washington, DC, USA: USDA Agriculture Handbook 654, 1990,573-579.
    [5] F. Bonner, The Woody Plant Seed Manual, Agriculture Handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., 2008.
    [6] F. Brauer and C. Castillo-Chavez, Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology, vol. 40, Springer, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1686-9.
    [7] Britannica, Pacific yew, Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011, https://www.britannica.com/plant/Pacific-yew.
    [8] U. C. Bureau, Age and sex, U.S. Census Bureau, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2022.S0101.
    [9] R. Burns, B. Honkala and U. S. F. Service, Silvics of North America: Conifers, Agriculture Handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1990, https://books.google.com/books?id = uNygEIp5Bm0C.
    [10] R. T. Busing, C. B. Halpern and T. A. Spies, Ecology of pacific yew (taxus brevifolia) in western oregon and washington, Conservation Biology, 1199-1207.
    [11] R. T. Busing and T. A. Spies, Modeling the population dynamics of pacific yew, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Res. Note PNW-RN-515. Portland (1995), 16 pp. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051199.x.
    [12] S. I. Cameron and R. F. Smith, Seasonal changes in the concentration of major taxanes in the biomass of wild canada yew (taxus canadensis. marsh.), Pharmaceutical Biology, 46 (2008), 35-40.  doi: 10.1080/13880200701729760.
    [13] H. Castillo-Alvino and M. Marvá, The competition model with holling type ii competitive response to interfering time, Journal of Biological Dynamics, 14 (2020), 222-244.  doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1742392.
    [14] S. Chaudhary, A cancer treating yew tree is critically endangered in nepal, Global Voices Website, 2020, https://globalvoices.org/2020/03/06/a-cancer-treating-yew-tree-is-critically-endangered-in-nepal/amp/.
    [15] G. M. Cragg and J. M. Pezzuto, Natural products as a vital source for the discovery of cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents, Medical Principles and Practice, 25 (2016), 41-59.  doi: 10.1159/000443404.
    [16] D. L. DeAngelis, D. Franco, A. Hastings, F. M. Hilker, S. M. Lenhart, F. Lutscher, N. B. Petrovskaya, S. V. Petrovskii and R. C. Tyson, Towards building a sustainable future: Positioning ecological modelling for impact in ecosystems management, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 83 (2021), article number 107. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 237423948. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00927-y.
    [17] C. A. Dehelean, I. Marcovici, C. Soica, M. Mioc, D. Coricovac, S. Iurciuc, O. M. Cretu and I. Pinzaru, Plant-derived anticancer compounds as new perspectives in drug discovery and alternative therapy, Molecules, 26, (2021), 1109. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041109.
    [18] W. DingS. Lenhart and H. Behncke, Discrete time optimal harvesting of fish populations with age structure, Letters in Biomathematics, 1 (2014), 193-207.  doi: 10.1080/23737867.2014.11414480.
    [19] H. EnderlingM. A. J. ChaplainA. R. A. Anderson and J. S. Vaidya, A mathematical model of breast cancer development, local treatment and recurrence, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 246 (2007), 245-259.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.010.
    [20] C. for Disease Control and N. C. f. H. S. Prevention, Number of deaths per 100,000 population by gender — kff, KFF (Website), 2021, https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/death-rate-by-gender/?currentTimeframe = 0&selectedDistributions = female&selectedRows = %7B%22wrapups%22: %7B%22united-states%22: %7B%7D%7D%7D&sortModel = %7B%22colId%22: %22Female%22, %22sort%22: %22asc%22%7D#notes.
    [21] O. G. GaoueJ. JiangW. DingF. B. Agusto and S. Lenhart, Optimal harvesting strategies for timber and non-timber forest products in tropical ecosystems, Theoretical Ecology, 9 (2016), 287-297.  doi: 10.1007/s12080-015-0286-4.
    [22] H. Gersmann and J. Aldred, Medicinal tree used in chemotherapy drug faces extinction, The Guardian (Website), 2011, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/10/iucn-red-list-tree-chemotherapy.
    [23] M. Hasanbulli, S. P. Rogovchenko and Y. V. Rogovchenko, Dynamics of a single species in a fluctuating environment under periodic yield harvesting, Journal of Applied Mathematics, (2013), Art. ID 167671, 12 pp. doi: 10.1155/2013/167671.
    [24] N. K. IbrahimB. SamuelsR. PageD. DovalK. M. PatelS. RaoM. K. NairP. BharN. Desai and G. N. Hortobagyi, Multicenter phase ii trial of abi-007, an albumin-bound paclitaxel, in women with metastatic breast cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23 (2005), 6019-6026.  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.013.
    [25] N. C. Institute, A story of discovery: Natural compound helps treat breast and ovarian cancers, 2015, https://www.cancer.gov/research/progress/discovery/taxol.
    [26] W. Jevons, The Coal Question: An Enquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-mines, Making Of The Modern World. Part 2, Macmillan, 1865, https://books.google.com/books?id = gAAKAAAAIAAJ. doi: 10.1017/S0016756800197468.
    [27] H. R. JoshiG. E. HerreraS. Lenhart and M. G. Neubert, Optimal dynamic harvest of a mobile renewable resource, Natural Resource Modeling, 22 (2009), 322-343.  doi: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2008.00038.x.
    [28] Y. KangS. K. Sasmal and K. Messan, A two-patch prey-predator model with predator dispersal driven by the predation strength, Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 14 (2017), 843-880.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017046.
    [29] M. R. KellyM. G. Neubert and S. Lenhart, Marine reserves and optimal dynamic harvesting when fishing damages habitat, Theoretical Ecology, 12 (2019), 131-144.  doi: 10.1007/s12080-018-0399-7.
    [30] U. LankerA. R. MalikN. K. Gupta and J. S. Butola, Natural regeneration status of the endangered medicinal plant, taxus baccata hook. f. syn. t. wallichiana, in northwest himalaya, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 6 (2010), 20-27.  doi: 10.1080/21513732.2010.527302.
    [31] S. Lenhart, Optimal harvesting strategies for timber and non-timber forest products in tropical ecosystems, in World Conference on Natural Resource Modeling., 34 (2016), https://scholarexchange.furman.edu/rma/all/presentations/34.
    [32] S. Lenhart and J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2007. doi: 10.1201/9781420011418.
    [33] S. MalikR. M. CusidóM. H. MirjaliliE. MoyanoJ. Palazón and M. Bonfill, Production of the anticancer drug taxol in taxus baccata suspension cultures: A review, Process Biochemistry, 46 (2011), 23-34.  doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.09.004.
    [34] S. Mayor, Tree that provides paclitaxel is put on list of endangered species, BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 343 (2011), d7411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7411.
    [35] J. D. Meiss, Differential Dynamical Systems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2007. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898718232.
    [36] K. MillerM. WangJ. GralowM. DicklerM. CobleighE. A. PerezT. ShenkierD. Cella and N. E. Davidson, Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, 357 (2007), 2666-2676.  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072113.
    [37] M. S. Murray and E. M. Hansen, Susceptibility of pacific yew to phytophthora lateralis, Plant Disease, 81 (1997), 1400-1404.  doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.12.1400.
    [38] D. J. Newman and G. M. Cragg, Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019, Journal of Natural Products, 83 (2020), 770-803.  doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285.
    [39] G. B. of Disease Collaborative Network, Global burden of disease study 2019 (gbd 2019) results, Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2020. Available from https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/.
    [40] World Health Organization, Global cancer burden growing, amidst mounting need for services, https://www.who.int/news/item/01-02-2024-global-cancer-burden-growing–amidst-mounting-need-for-services, 2024.
    [41] D. M. ParkinF. BrayJ. Ferlay and P. Pisani, Global cancer statistics, 2002, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55 (2005), 74-108.  doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
    [42] K. Pavid, 40% of plants are threatened with extinction, The Natural History Museum (Website), 2020, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2020/september/two-in-five-plants-are-threatened-with-extinction.html.
    [43] T. Phillips, O. G. Gaoue, S. Lenhart and W. C. Strickland, Modeling the effects of size-dependent harvesting strategies on the population dynamics of tropical trees, Mathematical Biosciences, 355 (2023), 108953, 13 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108953.
    [44] R. A. Price, The genera of taxaceae in the southeastern united states, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 71 (1990), 69-91, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43782231. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.24926.
    [45] K. Purnachandra Rao and K. Hntsa, Population dynamics of harvesting fishery and predator, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2 (2015), 3159-3199. 
    [46] R. Roe-DaleD. Isaacson and M. Kupferschmid, A mathematical model of breast cancer treatment with cmf and doxorubicin, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 73 (2011), 585-608.  doi: 10.1007/s11538-010-9549-9.
    [47] G. T. Skalski and J. F. Gilliam, Functional responses with predator interference: Viable alternatives to the holling type ii model, Ecology, 82 (2001), 3083-3092, https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/0012-9658
    [48] J. Solís-PérezJ. F. Gómez-Aguilar and A. Atangana, A fractional mathematical model of breast cancer competition model, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 127 (2019), 38-54.  doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.06.027.
    [49] B. Song, Basic reinfection number and backward bifurcation, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 18 (2021), 8064-8083.  doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021400.
    [50] S. O. SowoleD. SangareA. A. Ibrahim and I. A. Paul, On the existence, uniqueness, stability of solution and numerical simulations of a mathematical model for measles disease, Int. J. Adv. Math, 2019 (2019), 84-111. 
    [51] J. A. SparanoM. WangS. MartinoV. JonesE. A. PerezT. SaphnerA. C. WolffG. W. Sledge JrW. C. Wood and N. E. Davidson, Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, 358 (2008), 1663-1671.  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707056.
    [52] G. A. StrobelA. Stierle and F. J. G. M. van Kuijk, Factors influencing the in vitro production of radiolabeled taxol by pacific yew, taxus brevifolia, Plant Science, 84 (1992), 65-74.  doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90209-5.
    [53] H. SungJ. FerlayR. L. SiegelM. LaversanneI. SoerjomataramA. Jemal and F. Bray, Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71 (2021), 209-249.  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
    [54] R. L. Taylor and S. Taylor, Taxus brevifolia in british columbia. western yew, member of the family taxaceae, Davidsonia.
    [55] H. R. ThiemeMathematics in Population Biology, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2003.  doi: 10.1515/9780691187655.
    [56] P. A. Thomas and A. Polwart, Taxus baccata l., Journal of Ecology, 91 (2003), 489-524.  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00783.x.
    [57] V. Walsh and J. Goodman, Cancer chemotherapy, biodiversity, public and private property: The case of the anti-cancer drug taxol, Social Science & Medicine, 49 (1999), 1215-1225.  doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00161-6.
    [58] B. Zeide, Analysis of growth equations, Forest Science, 39 (1993), 594-616.  doi: 10.1093/forestscience/39.3.594.
  • 加载中

Figures(8)

Tables(4)

SHARE

Article Metrics

HTML views(5739) PDF downloads(585) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return