American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
December  2006, 1(4): 689-706. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.689

On the control volume finite element methods and their applications to multiphase flow

Zhangxin Chen 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Box 750156, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275-0156

Received  September 2006 Published  October 2006

In this paper we systematically review the control volume finite element (CVFE) methods for numerical solutions of second-order partial differential equations. Their relationships to the finite difference and standard (Galerkin) finite element methods are considered. Through their relationship to the finite differences, upstream weighted CVFE methods and the conditions on positive transmissibilities (positive flux linkages) are studied. Through their relationship to the standard finite elements, error estimates for the CVFE are obtained. These estimates are comparable to those for the standard finite element methods using piecewise linear elements. Finally, an application to multiphase flows in porous media is presented.
Keywords: error analysis, upstream weighting, multiphase flow, Galerkin finite element, numerical experiments., Control volume finite element.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 65N30, 65N10; Secondary: 76S05, 76T0.
Citation: Zhangxin Chen. On the control volume finite element methods and their applications to multiphase flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (4) : 689-706. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.689
[1]

Christos V. Nikolopoulos, Georgios E. Zouraris. Numerical solution of a non-local elliptic problem modeling a thermistor with a finite element and a finite volume method. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 768-778. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.768
[2]

Philip Trautmann, Boris Vexler, Alexander Zlotnik. Finite element error analysis for measure-valued optimal control problems governed by a 1D wave equation with variable coefficients. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2018, 8 (2) : 411-449. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018017
[3]

Nora Aïssiouene, Marie-Odile Bristeau, Edwige Godlewski, Jacques Sainte-Marie. A combined finite volume - finite element scheme for a dispersive shallow water system. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (1) : 1-27. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.1
[4]

Norikazu Saito. Error analysis of a conservative finite-element approximation for the Keller-Segel system of chemotaxis. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (1) : 339-364. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.339
[5]

Na Peng, Jiayu Han, Jing An. An efficient finite element method and error analysis for fourth order problems in a spherical domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022021
[6]

Dominik Hafemeyer, Florian Mannel, Ira Neitzel, Boris Vexler. Finite element error estimates for one-dimensional elliptic optimal control by BV-functions. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2020, 10 (2) : 333-363. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019041
[7]

Eduardo Casas, Mariano Mateos, Arnd Rösch. Finite element approximation of sparse parabolic control problems. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 393-417. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017014
[8]

Wolf-Jüergen Beyn, Janosch Rieger. Galerkin finite element methods for semilinear elliptic differential inclusions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (2) : 295-312. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.295
[9]

Xiaomeng Li, Qiang Xu, Ailing Zhu. Weak Galerkin mixed finite element methods for parabolic equations with memory. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 513-531. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019034
[10]

Xiu Ye, Shangyou Zhang, Peng Zhu. A weak Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear conservation laws. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1897-1923. doi: 10.3934/era.2020097
[11]

Bin Wang, Lin Mu. Viscosity robust weak Galerkin finite element methods for Stokes problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1881-1895. doi: 10.3934/era.2020096
[12]

Jiwei Jia, Young-Ju Lee, Yue Feng, Zichan Wang, Zhongshu Zhao. Hybridized weak Galerkin finite element methods for Brinkman equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (3) : 2489-2516. doi: 10.3934/era.2020126
[13]

Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (3) : 2375-2389. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120
[14]

Lijuan Wang, Jun Zou. Error estimates of finite element methods for parameter identifications in elliptic and parabolic systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1641-1670. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1641
[15]

Jie Shen, Xiaofeng Yang. Error estimates for finite element approximations of consistent splitting schemes for incompressible flows. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (3) : 663-676. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.663
[16]

Marita Holtmannspötter, Arnd Rösch, Boris Vexler. A priori error estimates for the space-time finite element discretization of an optimal control problem governed by a coupled linear PDE-ODE system. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2021, 11 (3) : 601-624. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021014
[17]

Caterina Calgaro, Meriem Ezzoug, Ezzeddine Zahrouni. Stability and convergence of an hybrid finite volume-finite element method for a multiphasic incompressible fluid model. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (2) : 429-448. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018024
[18]

Binjie Li, Xiaoping Xie, Shiquan Zhang. New convergence analysis for assumed stress hybrid quadrilateral finite element method. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2831-2856. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017153
[19]

Junjiang Lai, Jianguo Huang. A finite element method for vibration analysis of elastic plate-plate structures. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (2) : 387-419. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.387
[20]

Mei-Qin Zhan. Finite element analysis and approximations of phase-lock equations of superconductivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2002, 2 (1) : 95-108. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2002.2.95

2020 Impact Factor: 1.213

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (77)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (24)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy