American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2009, 4(2): 409-430. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.409

Comparison of two data assimilation algorithms for shallow water flows

Issam S. Strub 1, , Julie Percelay 2, , Olli-Pekka Tossavainen 3, and  Alexandre M. Bayen 4,

1. 

Systems Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 604 Davis Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States
2. 

Environmental Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 604 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States
3. 

Systems Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Berkeley Water Center, 413 O’Brien Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States
4. 

Systems Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 711 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States

Received  November 2008 Revised  February 2009 Published  June 2009

This article presents the comparison of two algorithms for data assimilation of two dimensional shallow water flows. The first algorithm is based on a linearization of the model equations and a quadratic programming (QP) formulation of the problem. The second algorithm uses Ensemble Kalman Filtering (EnKF) applied to the non-linear two dimensional shallow water equations. The two methods are implemented on a scenario in which boundary conditions and Lagrangian measurements are available. The performance of the methods is evaluated using twin experiments with experimentally measured bathymetry data and boundary conditions from a river located in the Sacramento Delta. The sensitivity of the algorithms to the number of drifters, low or high discharge and time sampling frequency is studied.
Keywords: Shallow Water Equations, Ensemble Kalman Filtering., Data Assimilation, Quadratic Programming.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 58F15, 58F17; Secondary: 53C3.
Citation: Issam S. Strub, Julie Percelay, Olli-Pekka Tossavainen, Alexandre M. Bayen. Comparison of two data assimilation algorithms for shallow water flows. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (2) : 409-430. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.409
[1]

Z. G. Feng, Kok Lay Teo, N. U. Ahmed, Yulin Zhao, W. Y. Yan. Optimal fusion of sensor data for Kalman filtering. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 483-503. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.483
[2]

Yuan Pei. Continuous data assimilation for the 3D primitive equations of the ocean. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (2) : 643-661. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019032
[3]

Joshua Hudson, Michael Jolly. Numerical efficacy study of data assimilation for the 2D magnetohydrodynamic equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (1) : 131-145. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019006
[4]

Neil K. Chada, Claudia Schillings, Simon Weissmann. On the incorporation of box-constraints for ensemble Kalman inversion. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (4) : 433-456. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019018
[5]

Madalina Petcu, Roger Temam. The one dimensional shallow water equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the velocity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (1) : 209-222. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.209
[6]

Zhigang Wang. Vanishing viscosity limit of the rotating shallow water equations with far field vacuum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (1) : 311-328. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018015
[7]

Chengchun Hao. Cauchy problem for viscous shallow water equations with surface tension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (3) : 593-608. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.593
[8]

Denys Dutykh, Dimitrios Mitsotakis. On the relevance of the dam break problem in the context of nonlinear shallow water equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (4) : 799-818. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.799
[9]

Madalina Petcu, Roger Temam. An interface problem: The two-layer shallow water equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (11&12) : 5327-5345. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.5327
[10]

Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model for the reformulated shallow water equations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 375-385. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.375
[11]

David F. Parker. Higher-order shallow water equations and the Camassa-Holm equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (3) : 629-641. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.629
[12]

Justin Cyr, Phuong Nguyen, Roger Temam. Stochastic one layer shallow water equations with Lévy noise. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3765-3818. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018331
[13]

Werner Bauer, François Gay-Balmaz. Towards a geometric variational discretization of compressible fluids: The rotating shallow water equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (1) : 1-37. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019001
[14]

Xiaoping Zhai, Hailong Ye. On global large energy solutions to the viscous shallow water equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020097
[15]

Robert McOwen, Peter Topalov. Asymptotics in shallow water waves. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (7) : 3103-3131. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3103
[16]

Alexandre J. Chorin, Fei Lu, Robert N. Miller, Matthias Morzfeld, Xuemin Tu. Sampling, feasibility, and priors in data assimilation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (8) : 4227-4246. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4227
[17]

Junyoung Jang, Kihoon Jang, Hee-Dae Kwon, Jeehyun Lee. Feedback control of an HBV model based on ensemble kalman filter and differential evolution. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (3) : 667-691. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018030
[18]

Le Yin, Ioannis Sgouralis, Vasileios Maroulas. Topological reconstruction of sub-cellular motion with Ensemble Kalman velocimetry. Foundations of Data Science,   doi: 10.3934/fods.2020007
[19]

Adam Larios, Yuan Pei. Approximate continuous data assimilation of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations via the Voigt-regularization with observable data. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020, 9 (3) : 733-751. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020031
[20]

Débora A. F. Albanez, Maicon J. Benvenutti. Continuous data assimilation algorithm for simplified Bardina model. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (1) : 33-52. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018002

2019 Impact Factor: 1.053

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (22)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences