American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2009, 4(3): 501-526. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.501

Boltzmann maps for networks of chemical reactions and the multi-stability problem

Andrea Picco 1, and  Lamberto Rondoni 2,

1. 

Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), Str Prov 142, Km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo (Torino), Italy
2. 

Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Received  March 2008 Revised  April 2009 Published  July 2009

Boltzmann Maps are a class of discrete dynamical systems that may be used in the study of complex chemical reaction processes. In this paper they are generalized to open systems allowing the description of non-stoichiometrically balanced reactions with unequal reaction rates. We show that they can be widely used to describe the relevant dynamics, leading to interesting insights on the multi-stability problem in networks of chemical reactions. Necessary conditions for multistability are thus identified. Our findings indicate that the dynamics produced by laws like the mass action law, can hardly produce multistable phenomena. In particular, we prove that they cannot do it in a wide range of chemical reactions.
Keywords: General biology and biomathematics., etc.), Biochemistry, Stochastic methods (Fokker-Planck, molecular biology, Biophysics, Langevin.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92C40, 92C05; Secondary: 82C31, 92B0.
Citation: Andrea Picco, Lamberto Rondoni. Boltzmann maps for networks of chemical reactions and the multi-stability problem. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (3) : 501-526. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.501
[1]

Sylvain De Moor, Luis Miguel Rodrigues, Julien Vovelle. Invariant measures for a stochastic Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 357-395. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018017
[2]

Eugene Kashdan, Dominique Duncan, Andrew Parnell, Heinz Schättler. Mathematical methods in systems biology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (6) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/mbe.201606i
[3]

Howard A. Levine, Yeon-Jung Seo, Marit Nilsen-Hamilton. A discrete dynamical system arising in molecular biology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 2091-2151. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2091
[4]

Jacky Cresson, Bénédicte Puig, Stefanie Sonner. Stochastic models in biology and the invariance problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2145-2168. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016041
[5]

Linghua Chen, Espen R. Jakobsen. L1 semigroup generation for Fokker-Planck operators associated to general Lévy driven SDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (11) : 5735-5763. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018250
[6]

Shui-Nee Chow, Wuchen Li, Haomin Zhou. Entropy dissipation of Fokker-Planck equations on graphs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (10) : 4929-4950. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018215
[7]

Martin Burger, Ina Humpert, Jan-Frederik Pietschmann. On Fokker-Planck equations with In- and Outflow of Mass. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (2) : 249-277. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020009
[8]

Marco Torregrossa, Giuseppe Toscani. On a Fokker-Planck equation for wealth distribution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018016
[9]

Michael Herty, Christian Jörres, Albert N. Sandjo. Optimization of a model Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 485-503. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.485
[10]

José Antonio Alcántara, Simone Calogero. On a relativistic Fokker-Planck equation in kinetic theory. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 401-426. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.401
[11]

Michael Herty, Lorenzo Pareschi. Fokker-Planck asymptotics for traffic flow models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 165-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.165
[12]

Monique Chyba, Benedetto Piccoli. Special issue on mathematical methods in systems biology. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (1) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/nhm.20191i
[13]

Helge Dietert, Josephine Evans, Thomas Holding. Contraction in the Wasserstein metric for the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation on the torus. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1427-1441. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018056
[14]

Zeinab Karaki. Trend to the equilibrium for the Fokker-Planck system with an external magnetic field. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (2) : 309-344. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020011
[15]

Andreas Denner, Oliver Junge, Daniel Matthes. Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008
[16]

Roberta Bosi. Classical limit for linear and nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 845-870. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.845
[17]

Yuan Gao, Guangzhen Jin, Jian-Guo Liu. Inbetweening auto-animation via Fokker-Planck dynamics and thresholding. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021016
[18]

Ioannis Markou. Hydrodynamic limit for a Fokker-Planck equation with coefficients in Sobolev spaces. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 683-705. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017028
[19]

Manh Hong Duong, Yulong Lu. An operator splitting scheme for the fractional kinetic Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (10) : 5707-5727. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019250
[20]

Giuseppe Toscani. A Rosenau-type approach to the approximation of the linear Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 697-714. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018028

2020 Impact Factor: 1.213

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (48)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences