• Previous Article
    Theoretical and numerical aspects of the interfacial coupling: The scalar Riemann problem and an application to multiphase flows
  • NHM Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    On some difference schemes and entropy conditions for a class of multi-species kinematic flow models with discontinuous flux
September  2010, 5(3): 487-505. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.487

Schwarz waveform relaxation algorithms for semilinear reaction-diffusion equations

1. 

Univ. Paris-Sud, Département de Mathématiques, CNRS, F-91405 Orsay, France

2. 

Section de Mathématiques, Université de Genève, CP 64, 1211 Genève, Switzerland

3. 

Université Paris 13, CNRS, UMR 7539 LAGA, 99 av. Jean-Baptiste Clément, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France

4. 

DMA, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d’Ulm, Paris, France

Received  January 2010 Revised  May 2010 Published  July 2010

We introduce nonoverlapping domain decomposition algorithms of Schwarz waveform relaxation type for the semilinear reaction-diffusion equation. We define linear Robin and second order (or Ventcell) transmission conditions between the subdomains, which we prove to lead to a well defined and converging algorithm. We also propose nonlinear transmission conditions. Both types are based on best approximation problems for the linear equation and provide efficient algorithms, as the numerical results that we present here show.
Citation: Filipa Caetano, Martin J. Gander, Laurence Halpern, Jérémie Szeftel. Schwarz waveform relaxation algorithms for semilinear reaction-diffusion equations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (3) : 487-505. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.487
[1]

Narcisa Apreutesei, Vitaly Volpert. Reaction-diffusion waves with nonlinear boundary conditions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (1) : 23-35. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.23

[2]

Abdelghafour Atlas, Mostafa Bendahmane, Fahd Karami, Driss Meskine, Omar Oubbih. A nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion system applied to image denoising and decomposition. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (9) : 4963-4998. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020321

[3]

Mohamed Ouzahra. Approximate controllability of the semilinear reaction-diffusion equation governed by a multiplicative control. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (2) : 1075-1090. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021081

[4]

Thi-Thao-Phuong Hoang. Optimized Ventcel-Schwarz waveform relaxation and mixed hybrid finite element method for transport problems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022060

[5]

Zhiting Xu, Yingying Zhao. A reaction-diffusion model of dengue transmission. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2993-3018. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2993

[6]

Perla El Kettani, Danielle Hilhorst, Kai Lee. A stochastic mass conserved reaction-diffusion equation with nonlinear diffusion. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (11) : 5615-5648. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018246

[7]

Simone Cacace, Maurizio Falcone. A dynamic domain decomposition for the eikonal-diffusion equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 109-123. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.109

[8]

M. Grasselli, V. Pata. A reaction-diffusion equation with memory. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 15 (4) : 1079-1088. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.15.1079

[9]

Thomas I. Seidman. Interface conditions for a singular reaction-diffusion system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (3) : 631-643. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.631

[10]

Jihoon Lee, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen. Gromov-Hausdorff stability of reaction diffusion equations with Robin boundary conditions under perturbations of the domain and equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (3) : 1263-1296. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021020

[11]

Costică Moroşanu, Bianca Satco. Qualitative and quantitative analysis for a nonlocal and nonlinear reaction-diffusion problem with in-homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022042

[12]

W. E. Fitzgibbon, M. Langlais, J.J. Morgan. A reaction-diffusion system modeling direct and indirect transmission of diseases. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 893-910. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.893

[13]

Wenzhang Huang, Maoan Han, Kaiyu Liu. Dynamics of an SIS reaction-diffusion epidemic model for disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (1) : 51-66. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.51

[14]

Sebastian Aniţa, Vincenzo Capasso. Stabilization of a reaction-diffusion system modelling malaria transmission. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 1673-1684. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.1673

[15]

Wei Wang, Anthony Roberts. Macroscopic discrete modelling of stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on a periodic domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (1) : 253-273. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.253

[16]

Peter Poláčik, Eiji Yanagida. Stable subharmonic solutions of reaction-diffusion equations on an arbitrary domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8 (1) : 209-218. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2002.8.209

[17]

Zhaosheng Feng. Traveling waves to a reaction-diffusion equation. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 382-390. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.382

[18]

Nick Bessonov, Gennady Bocharov, Tarik Mohammed Touaoula, Sergei Trofimchuk, Vitaly Volpert. Delay reaction-diffusion equation for infection dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (5) : 2073-2091. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019085

[19]

Costică Moroşanu. Stability and errors analysis of two iterative schemes of fractional steps type associated to a nonlinear reaction-diffusion equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (5) : 1567-1587. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020089

[20]

Oleksiy V. Kapustyan, Pavlo O. Kasyanov, José Valero. Structure and regularity of the global attractor of a reaction-diffusion equation with non-smooth nonlinear term. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 4155-4182. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4155

2020 Impact Factor: 1.213

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (61)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (10)

[Back to Top]