Complexity, selectivity and asymmetry in the conformation of the power phenomenon. Analysis of Chilean society

Juan Pablo Cárdenas; Gerardo Vidal; Gastón Olivares

doi:10.3934/nhm.2015.10.167

Previous Article
Efficient algorithms for estimating loss of information in a complex network: Applications to intentional risk analysis
NHM Home
This Issue
Next Article
Indirect influences in international trade

March 2015, 10(1): 167-194. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.167

Complexity, selectivity and asymmetry in the conformation of the power phenomenon. Analysis of Chilean society

Juan Pablo Cárdenas ^1, , Gerardo Vidal ^2, and Gastón Olivares ^3,

1.	Inria-Chile, Apoquindo 2827, Piso 12. Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
2.	Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa-CEAL, Avenida Brasil, 2950, Valparaíso, Chile
3.	Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Valparaíso, Subida Artillería 470, Valparaíso, Chile

Received June 2014 Revised November 2014 Published February 2015

Abstract
Related Papers

In this work we analyzed the relationships between powerful politicians and businessmen of Chile in order to study the phenomenon of social power. We developed our study according to Complex Network Theory but also using traditional sociological theories of Power and Elites. Our analyses suggest that the studied network displays common properties of Complex Networks, such as scaling in connectivity distribution, properties of small-world networks, and modular structure, among others. We also observed that social power (a proposed metric is presented in this work) is also distributed inhomogeneously. However, the most interesting observation is that this inhomogeneous power and connectivity distribution, among other observed properties, may be the result of a dynamic and unregulated process of network growth in which powerful people tend to link to similar others. The compatibility between people, increasingly selective as the network grows, could generate the presence of extremely powerful people, but also a constant inequality of power where the difference between the most powerful is the same as among the least powerful. Our results are also in accordance with sociological theories.

Keywords: model, theory of social power., theory of Elites, social networks, Complex networks.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 05C82, 91D30; Secondary: 90B1.

Citation: Juan Pablo Cárdenas, Gerardo Vidal, Gastón Olivares. Complexity, selectivity and asymmetry in the conformation of the power phenomenon. Analysis of Chilean society. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (1) : 167-194. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.167

References:

[1]	P. S. Adler and S. W. Kwon, Social Capital: Prospects for a new concept, The Academy of Management Review, 27 (2002), 17-40. doi: 10.2307/4134367. Google Scholar
[2]	J. Alonso, Pareto, $1^{st}$ edition, Edicol, México, 1977. Google Scholar
[3]	J. Alstott, E. Bullmore and D. Plenz, Powerlaw: A python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions,, preprint, (). Google Scholar
[4]	F. Alvaredo, A. B. Atkinson, T. Piketty and E. Saez, The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (2013), 3-20. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.3.3. Google Scholar
[5]	G. Álvarez, Caos/Complejidad, Fractales e Identidades sociales, Razón y Palabra, 79 (2012). Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199524411055. Google Scholar
[6]	R. Aron, La Sociología Alemana Contemporánea, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1965. Google Scholar
[7]	P. Ball, Critical Mass, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2004. Google Scholar
[8]	A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286 (1999), 509-512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. Google Scholar
[9]	J. A. Barbier, Elite and cadres in bourbon Chile, The Hispanic American Historical Review, 52 (1972), 416-435. doi: 10.2307/2512001. Google Scholar
[10]	J. Bascompte and B. Luque, Evolución y Complejidad, Publicacions de la Universitat de Valéncia, Valéncia, 2012. Google Scholar
[11]	J. Bascompte and P. Jordano, Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity, Anual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38 (2007), 567-593. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818. Google Scholar
[12]	R. Bendix, Max Weber and Intellectual Portrait, Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York, 1962. Google Scholar
[13]	L. von Bertalanffy, Teoría General de los Sistemas, México, 1991. Available from: http://es.scribd.com/doc/135617671/TGS-Bertalanffy-pdf? Google Scholar
[14]	V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte and E. Lefebvre, Fast unfolding of communities in large networks, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiments, 2008 (2008), P10008. Google Scholar
[15]	M. Buchanan, Ubiquity, Three River Press, New York, 2000. Google Scholar
[16]	J. P. Cárdenas, M. Mouronte, J. C. Losada and R. M. Benito, Compatibility as underlying mechanism behind the evolution of networks, Physica A, 389 (2010), 1789-1798. Google Scholar
[17]	R. Dahl, La Poliarquía: Partcipación y Oposición, Tecnos, 2009. Google Scholar
[18]	R. Dahrendorf, La Ley y el Orden, $1^{st}$ edition, Editorial Civitas, 1994. Google Scholar
[19]	S. Deploigé, El Conflicto de la Moral y de la Sociología, McGraw-Hill, México, 1920. Google Scholar
[20]	S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Evolution of Networks. From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515906.001.0001. Google Scholar
[21]	E. Durkheim, Las Reglas del Método Sociológico, Dedalo, Buenos Aires, 1964. Google Scholar
[22]	P. Erdős and A. Rényi, On random graphs, Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6 (1959), 290-297. Google Scholar
[23]	M. Foucault, Microfísica del Poder, $2^{nd}$ edition, La Piqueta, Madrid, 1980. Google Scholar
[24]	O. González del Cardenal, El Poder y la Conciencia. Rostros Personales Frente a Poderes An\'onimos, $2^{nd}$ edition, Espasa Calpe, Madrid, 1985. Google Scholar
[25]	M. S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973), 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Harary, R. Norman and D. Cartwright, Structural Models, Wiley, New York, 1965. Google Scholar
[27]	P. Klimek, R. Lambiotte and S. Thurner, Opinion formation in laggard societies, Europhysics Letters, 82 (2008), 28008, 6pp. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/82/28008. Google Scholar
[28]	W. Kornhauser, The Politics of Mass Society, Routledge, New York, 1959. Google Scholar
[29]	E. Laszlo, La Gran Bifurcación. Crisis y Oportunidad; Anticipación del Nuevo Paradigma que Está Tomando Forma, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1990. Google Scholar
[30]	G. Lenski, Poder y Privilegio. Teoría de la Estratificación Social, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1969. Google Scholar
[31]	R. López, E. Figueroa and P. Gutiérrez, La parte del León: Nuevas estimaciones de la participación de los súper ricos en el ingreso de Chile, Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Economía. Serie de Documentos de Trabajo, 2013. Available from: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/306018fadb3ac79952bf1395a555a90a86633790.pdf. Google Scholar
[32]	C. Maldonado, Complejidad y ciencias sociales. el problema de la medición de los sistemas sociales humanos, Complejidad de las ciencias y ciencias de la complejidad, (2006), 1-145. Google Scholar
[33]	B. Marmuc, Ideología, matemáticas y ciencias sociales, W. Pareto y G. Sorel y la ambigüedad en la comparación de las desigualdades, Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 5 (2013), 11-28. Google Scholar
[34]	A. Mayol, El Derrumbe del Modelo, LOM, Santiago, 2013. Google Scholar
[35]	M. Mitchell, Complexity. A Guided Tour, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. Google Scholar
[36]	R. Michels, Los Partidos Políticos, Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1976. Google Scholar
[37]	W. Mills, La Elite del Poder, $9^{th}$ edition, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1988. Google Scholar
[38]	J. Molina-Cano, Las nociones de mando y obediencia en la teoría política de Julien Freund, Díkaion, 23 (2009). Available from: http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1550/2126. Google Scholar
[39]	G. Mosca, La Clase Política, $2^{nd}$ edition, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1980. Google Scholar
[40]	G. Mosca, Elementi di Scienza Politica,, Reproduction of the original version. Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[41]	J. Nahapiet and S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998), 242-266. Google Scholar
[42]	P. Navarro, El Fenómeno de la Complejidad Social Humana, Curso de Doctorado Interdisciplinar en Sistemas Complejos, 1996. Available from: http://home.dsoc.uevora.pt/ eje/complexidade_social.html. Google Scholar
[43]	M. E. J. Newman, The structure and functions of complex networks, SIAM Review, 45 (2003), 167-256. doi: 10.1137/S003614450342480. Google Scholar
[44]	M. E. J. Newman, A.-L. Barabási and D. Watts, The Structure and Dynamics of Networks, Princeton University Press, New York, 2006. Google Scholar
[45]	M. E. J. Newman, Assortativity mixing in networks, Physical Review Letters, 89 (2002), 208701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701. Google Scholar
[46]	P. Nocera, El debate Gabriel Tarde y Emile Durkheim. De las disparidades iniciales explícitas a las convergencias tardías implícitas., Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[47]	L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani and T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web,, 1999. Available from: , (): 1999. Google Scholar
[48]	W. Pareto, Reseña de su Obra, Socio-Ciencia, 2009. Available from: http://socio-ciencia.blogspot.com/2009/10/wlfredo-pareto-una-resena-de-su-obra.html. Google Scholar
[49]	T. Parsons and E. Shils, Toward a General Theory of Action, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1962. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674863507. Google Scholar
[50]	PNUD-Chile, La Élite Chilena y la Difícil Conducción del Desarrollo, PNUD, 2004. Available from: http://www.centrodesarrollohumano.org/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=923#.U3DOTtyodrQ. Google Scholar
[51]	H. Rheingold, Multitudes Inteligentes, Gedisa, Barcelona, 2004. Google Scholar
[52]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Clásica, $1^{st}$ edition, Imprenta San Francisco de Sales, Madrid, 1920. Google Scholar
[53]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Contemporánea, McGraw-Hill, México, 1994. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Clásica, McGraw-Hill, México, 1994. Google Scholar
[55]	P. Rodrigo and D. Arenas, La nueva gobernanza política y las colaboraciones intersectoriales para el desarrollo sostenible, Innovar, 24 (2014), 197-210. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v24n53.43945. Google Scholar
[56]	G. Runciman, Crítica de la Filosofía de las Ciencias Sociales de Max Weber, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1976. Google Scholar
[57]	F. Sanchez López, Sociología de la Acción. Introducción a la obra de Talcott Parsons, Instituto Balmes de Sociología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 1964. Google Scholar
[58]	R. Sole, Redes Complejas. Del Genoma a Internet, Tusquets Eds., Barcelona, 2009. Google Scholar
[59]	N. N. Taleb, The Black Swan, Random House, New York, 2010. Google Scholar
[60]	R. Thom, Esbozo de una Semiofísica. Física Aristotélica y Teoría de las Catástrofes, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1990. Google Scholar
[61]	J. Touchard, Historia de las Ideas Políticas, Tecnos, Madrid, 1987. Google Scholar
[62]	G. Vidal, Chile Ante una Encrucijada?,, 2011. Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[63]	D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature, 393 (1998), 440-442. Google Scholar
[64]	M. Weber, Economía y Sociedad, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1964. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	P. S. Adler and S. W. Kwon, Social Capital: Prospects for a new concept, The Academy of Management Review, 27 (2002), 17-40. doi: 10.2307/4134367. Google Scholar
[2]	J. Alonso, Pareto, $1^{st}$ edition, Edicol, México, 1977. Google Scholar
[3]	J. Alstott, E. Bullmore and D. Plenz, Powerlaw: A python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions,, preprint, (). Google Scholar
[4]	F. Alvaredo, A. B. Atkinson, T. Piketty and E. Saez, The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (2013), 3-20. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.3.3. Google Scholar
[5]	G. Álvarez, Caos/Complejidad, Fractales e Identidades sociales, Razón y Palabra, 79 (2012). Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199524411055. Google Scholar
[6]	R. Aron, La Sociología Alemana Contemporánea, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1965. Google Scholar
[7]	P. Ball, Critical Mass, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2004. Google Scholar
[8]	A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286 (1999), 509-512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. Google Scholar
[9]	J. A. Barbier, Elite and cadres in bourbon Chile, The Hispanic American Historical Review, 52 (1972), 416-435. doi: 10.2307/2512001. Google Scholar
[10]	J. Bascompte and B. Luque, Evolución y Complejidad, Publicacions de la Universitat de Valéncia, Valéncia, 2012. Google Scholar
[11]	J. Bascompte and P. Jordano, Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity, Anual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38 (2007), 567-593. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095818. Google Scholar
[12]	R. Bendix, Max Weber and Intellectual Portrait, Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York, 1962. Google Scholar
[13]	L. von Bertalanffy, Teoría General de los Sistemas, México, 1991. Available from: http://es.scribd.com/doc/135617671/TGS-Bertalanffy-pdf? Google Scholar
[14]	V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte and E. Lefebvre, Fast unfolding of communities in large networks, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiments, 2008 (2008), P10008. Google Scholar
[15]	M. Buchanan, Ubiquity, Three River Press, New York, 2000. Google Scholar
[16]	J. P. Cárdenas, M. Mouronte, J. C. Losada and R. M. Benito, Compatibility as underlying mechanism behind the evolution of networks, Physica A, 389 (2010), 1789-1798. Google Scholar
[17]	R. Dahl, La Poliarquía: Partcipación y Oposición, Tecnos, 2009. Google Scholar
[18]	R. Dahrendorf, La Ley y el Orden, $1^{st}$ edition, Editorial Civitas, 1994. Google Scholar
[19]	S. Deploigé, El Conflicto de la Moral y de la Sociología, McGraw-Hill, México, 1920. Google Scholar
[20]	S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Evolution of Networks. From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515906.001.0001. Google Scholar
[21]	E. Durkheim, Las Reglas del Método Sociológico, Dedalo, Buenos Aires, 1964. Google Scholar
[22]	P. Erdős and A. Rényi, On random graphs, Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6 (1959), 290-297. Google Scholar
[23]	M. Foucault, Microfísica del Poder, $2^{nd}$ edition, La Piqueta, Madrid, 1980. Google Scholar
[24]	O. González del Cardenal, El Poder y la Conciencia. Rostros Personales Frente a Poderes An\'onimos, $2^{nd}$ edition, Espasa Calpe, Madrid, 1985. Google Scholar
[25]	M. S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973), 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469. Google Scholar
[26]	F. Harary, R. Norman and D. Cartwright, Structural Models, Wiley, New York, 1965. Google Scholar
[27]	P. Klimek, R. Lambiotte and S. Thurner, Opinion formation in laggard societies, Europhysics Letters, 82 (2008), 28008, 6pp. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/82/28008. Google Scholar
[28]	W. Kornhauser, The Politics of Mass Society, Routledge, New York, 1959. Google Scholar
[29]	E. Laszlo, La Gran Bifurcación. Crisis y Oportunidad; Anticipación del Nuevo Paradigma que Está Tomando Forma, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1990. Google Scholar
[30]	G. Lenski, Poder y Privilegio. Teoría de la Estratificación Social, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1969. Google Scholar
[31]	R. López, E. Figueroa and P. Gutiérrez, La parte del León: Nuevas estimaciones de la participación de los súper ricos en el ingreso de Chile, Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Economía. Serie de Documentos de Trabajo, 2013. Available from: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/306018fadb3ac79952bf1395a555a90a86633790.pdf. Google Scholar
[32]	C. Maldonado, Complejidad y ciencias sociales. el problema de la medición de los sistemas sociales humanos, Complejidad de las ciencias y ciencias de la complejidad, (2006), 1-145. Google Scholar
[33]	B. Marmuc, Ideología, matemáticas y ciencias sociales, W. Pareto y G. Sorel y la ambigüedad en la comparación de las desigualdades, Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 5 (2013), 11-28. Google Scholar
[34]	A. Mayol, El Derrumbe del Modelo, LOM, Santiago, 2013. Google Scholar
[35]	M. Mitchell, Complexity. A Guided Tour, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. Google Scholar
[36]	R. Michels, Los Partidos Políticos, Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1976. Google Scholar
[37]	W. Mills, La Elite del Poder, $9^{th}$ edition, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1988. Google Scholar
[38]	J. Molina-Cano, Las nociones de mando y obediencia en la teoría política de Julien Freund, Díkaion, 23 (2009). Available from: http://dikaion.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/dikaion/article/view/1550/2126. Google Scholar
[39]	G. Mosca, La Clase Política, $2^{nd}$ edition, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1980. Google Scholar
[40]	G. Mosca, Elementi di Scienza Politica,, Reproduction of the original version. Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[41]	J. Nahapiet and S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998), 242-266. Google Scholar
[42]	P. Navarro, El Fenómeno de la Complejidad Social Humana, Curso de Doctorado Interdisciplinar en Sistemas Complejos, 1996. Available from: http://home.dsoc.uevora.pt/ eje/complexidade_social.html. Google Scholar
[43]	M. E. J. Newman, The structure and functions of complex networks, SIAM Review, 45 (2003), 167-256. doi: 10.1137/S003614450342480. Google Scholar
[44]	M. E. J. Newman, A.-L. Barabási and D. Watts, The Structure and Dynamics of Networks, Princeton University Press, New York, 2006. Google Scholar
[45]	M. E. J. Newman, Assortativity mixing in networks, Physical Review Letters, 89 (2002), 208701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701. Google Scholar
[46]	P. Nocera, El debate Gabriel Tarde y Emile Durkheim. De las disparidades iniciales explícitas a las convergencias tardías implícitas., Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[47]	L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani and T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web,, 1999. Available from: , (): 1999. Google Scholar
[48]	W. Pareto, Reseña de su Obra, Socio-Ciencia, 2009. Available from: http://socio-ciencia.blogspot.com/2009/10/wlfredo-pareto-una-resena-de-su-obra.html. Google Scholar
[49]	T. Parsons and E. Shils, Toward a General Theory of Action, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1962. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674863507. Google Scholar
[50]	PNUD-Chile, La Élite Chilena y la Difícil Conducción del Desarrollo, PNUD, 2004. Available from: http://www.centrodesarrollohumano.org/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=923#.U3DOTtyodrQ. Google Scholar
[51]	H. Rheingold, Multitudes Inteligentes, Gedisa, Barcelona, 2004. Google Scholar
[52]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Clásica, $1^{st}$ edition, Imprenta San Francisco de Sales, Madrid, 1920. Google Scholar
[53]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Contemporánea, McGraw-Hill, México, 1994. Google Scholar
[54]	G. Ritzer, Teoría Sociológica Clásica, McGraw-Hill, México, 1994. Google Scholar
[55]	P. Rodrigo and D. Arenas, La nueva gobernanza política y las colaboraciones intersectoriales para el desarrollo sostenible, Innovar, 24 (2014), 197-210. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v24n53.43945. Google Scholar
[56]	G. Runciman, Crítica de la Filosofía de las Ciencias Sociales de Max Weber, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1976. Google Scholar
[57]	F. Sanchez López, Sociología de la Acción. Introducción a la obra de Talcott Parsons, Instituto Balmes de Sociología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, 1964. Google Scholar
[58]	R. Sole, Redes Complejas. Del Genoma a Internet, Tusquets Eds., Barcelona, 2009. Google Scholar
[59]	N. N. Taleb, The Black Swan, Random House, New York, 2010. Google Scholar
[60]	R. Thom, Esbozo de una Semiofísica. Física Aristotélica y Teoría de las Catástrofes, Gedisa, Barcelona, 1990. Google Scholar
[61]	J. Touchard, Historia de las Ideas Políticas, Tecnos, Madrid, 1987. Google Scholar
[62]	G. Vidal, Chile Ante una Encrucijada?,, 2011. Available from: , (). Google Scholar
[63]	D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature, 393 (1998), 440-442. Google Scholar
[64]	M. Weber, Economía y Sociedad, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1964. Google Scholar

[1]	Serap Ergün, Bariş Bülent Kırlar, Sırma Zeynep Alparslan Gök, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. An application of crypto cloud computing in social networks by cooperative game theory. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1927-1941. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019036
[2]	Werner Creixell, Juan Carlos Losada, Tomás Arredondo, Patricio Olivares, Rosa María Benito. Serendipity in social networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7 (3) : 363-371. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.363
[3]	Yuki Kumagai. Social networks and global transactions. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2019, 6 (3) : 211-219. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2019015
[4]	Stéphane Chrétien, Sébastien Darses, Christophe Guyeux, Paul Clarkson. On the pinning controllability of complex networks using perturbation theory of extreme singular values. application to synchronisation in power grids. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 289-299. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017019
[5]	Meng Zhao. The longtime behavior of the model with nonlocal diffusion and free boundaries in online social networks. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (3) : 1143-1160. doi: 10.3934/era.2020063
[6]	Sharon M. Cameron, Ariel Cintrón-Arias. Prisoner's Dilemma on real social networks: Revisited. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1381-1398. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1381
[7]	Robin Cohen, Alan Tsang, Krishna Vaidyanathan, Haotian Zhang. Analyzing opinion dynamics in online social networks. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2016, 1 (4) : 279-298. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016011
[8]	Xiaoshuang Xing, Gaofei Sun, Yong Jin, Wenyi Tang, Xiuzhen Cheng. Relay selection based on social relationship prediction and information leakage reduction for mobile social networks. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2018, 1 (4) : 369-382. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2018018
[9]	Guowei Dai, Ruyun Ma, Haiyan Wang, Feng Wang, Kuai Xu. Partial differential equations with Robin boundary condition in online social networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (6) : 1609-1624. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1609
[10]	Lea Ellwardt, Penélope Hernández, Guillem Martínez-Cánovas, Manuel Muñoz-Herrera. Conflict and segregation in networks: An experiment on the interplay between individual preferences and social influence. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2016, 3 (2) : 191-216. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2016010
[11]	Jingli Ren, Dandan Zhu, Haiyan Wang. Spreading-vanishing dichotomy in information diffusion in online social networks with intervention. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (4) : 1843-1865. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018240
[12]	Yi Xu, Qing Yang, Dianhui Chu. Exploring timeliness for accurate recommendation in location-based social networks. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2018, 1 (1) : 11-48. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2018002
[13]	Mirela Domijan, Markus Kirkilionis. Graph theory and qualitative analysis of reaction networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 295-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.295
[14]	Robert Carlson. Spectral theory for nonconservative transmission line networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (2) : 257-277. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.257
[15]	M. D. König, Stefano Battiston, M. Napoletano, F. Schweitzer. On algebraic graph theory and the dynamics of innovation networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 201-219. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.201
[16]	Meihong Qiao, Anping Liu, Qing Tang. The dynamics of an HBV epidemic model on complex heterogeneous networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (5) : 1393-1404. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1393
[17]	Filipe Martins, Alberto A. Pinto, Jorge Passamani Zubelli. Nash and social welfare impact in an international trade model. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2017, 4 (2) : 149-173. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2017009
[18]	Junyuan Yang, Yuming Chen, Jiming Liu. Stability analysis of a two-strain epidemic model on complex networks with latency. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (8) : 2851-2866. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016076
[19]	Ali Unver, Christian Ringhofer, Dieter Armbruster. A hyperbolic relaxation model for product flow in complex production networks. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 790-799. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.790
[20]	Zhen Jin, Guiquan Sun, Huaiping Zhu. Epidemic models for complex networks with demographics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (6) : 1295-1317. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1295

2020 Impact Factor: 1.213

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Complexity, selectivity and asymmetry in the conformation of the power phenomenon. Analysis of Chilean society

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Complexity, selectivity and asymmetry in the conformation of the power phenomenon. Analysis of Chilean society

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors