September  2017, 12(3): 417-459. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017019

Optimal control of infinite-dimensional piecewise deterministic Markov processes and application to the control of neuronal dynamics via Optogenetics

1. 

Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS UMR 7599, Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, F-75005, Paris, France

2. 

Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75005, Paris, France

Received  July 2016 Revised  May 2017 Published  September 2017

In this paper we define an infinite-dimensional controlled piecewise deterministic Markov process (PDMP) and we study an optimal control problem with finite time horizon and unbounded cost. This process is a coupling between a continuous time Markov Chain and a set of semilinear parabolic partial differential equations, both processes depending on the control. We apply dynamic programming to the embedded Markov decision process to obtain existence of optimal relaxed controls and we give some sufficient conditions ensuring the existence of an optimal ordinary control. This study, which constitutes an extension of controlled PDMPs to infinite dimension, is motivated by the control that provides Optogenetics on neuron models such as the Hodgkin-Huxley model. We define an infinite-dimensional controlled Hodgkin-Huxley model as an infinite-dimensional controlled piecewise deterministic Markov process and apply the previous results to prove the existence of optimal ordinary controls for a tracking problem.

Citation: Vincent Renault, Michèle Thieullen, Emmanuel Trélat. Optimal control of infinite-dimensional piecewise deterministic Markov processes and application to the control of neuronal dynamics via Optogenetics. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (3) : 417-459. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017019
References:
[1]

N. U. Ahmed, Properties of relaxed trajectories for a class of nonlinear evolution equations on a Banach space, SIAM J. Control Optim., 21 (1983), 953-957.  doi: 10.1137/0321058.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. U. Ahmed and K. L. Teo, Optimal control of systems governed by a class of nonlinear evolution equations in a reflexive Banach space, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 25 (1978), 57-81.   Google Scholar

[3]

N. U. Ahmed and X. Xiang, Properties of relaxed trajectories of evolution equations and optimal control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 31 (1993), 1135-1142.  doi: 10.1137/0331053.  Google Scholar

[4]

T. D. Austin, The emergence of the deterministic Hodgkin-Huxley equations as a limit from the underlying stochastic ion-channel mechanism, Ann. Appl. Probab., 18 (2008), 1279-1325.  doi: 10.1214/07-AAP494.  Google Scholar

[5]

E. J. Balder, A general denseness result for relaxed control theory, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 30 (1984), 463-475.  doi: 10.1017/S0004972700002185.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. Bertsekas and S. Shreve, Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-Time Case, Academic Press, 1978.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Billingsley, Convergence Of Probability Measures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968.  Google Scholar

[8]

E. S. BoydenF. ZhangE. BambergG. Nagel and K. Deisseroth, Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity, Nature Neuroscience, 8 (2005), 1263-1268.  doi: 10.1038/nn1525.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. BrandejskyB. de Saporta and F. Dufour, Numerical methods for the exit time of a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 44 (2012), 196-225.  doi: 10.1017/S0001867800005504.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. Buckwar and M. Riedler, An exact stochastic hybrid model of excitable membranes including spatio-temporal evolution, J. Math. Biol., 63 (2011), 1051-1093.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0395-z.  Google Scholar

[11]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, Optimal control of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes with finite time horizon, Modern Trends of Controlled Stochastic Processes: Theory and Applications, (2010), 144-160.   Google Scholar

[12]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, AMDP algorithms for portfolio optimization problems in pure jump markets, Finance Stoch., 13 (2009), 591-611.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-009-0093-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, Markov Decision Processes With Applications To Finance, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. Google Scholar

[14]

O. Costa and F. Dufour, Stability and ergodicity of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, SIAM J. of Control and Opt., 47 (2008), 1053-1077.  doi: 10.1137/060670109.  Google Scholar

[15]

O. Costa and F. Dufour, Singular perturbation for the discounted continuous control of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes, Appl. Math. and Opt., 63 (2011), 357-384.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-010-9124-7.  Google Scholar

[16]

O.L.V. CostaC.A. B RaymundoF. Dufour and K. Gonzalez, Optimal stopping with continuous control of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, Stoch. Stoch. Rep., 70 (2000), 41-73.  doi: 10.1080/17442500008834245.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. CruduA. DebusscheA. Muller and O. Radulescu, Convergence of stochastic gene networks to hybrid piecewise deterministic processe, Ann. Appl. Prob., 22 (2012), 1822-1859.  doi: 10.1214/11-AAP814.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. H. A. Davis, Piecewise-Deterministic Markov Processes: A general class of non-diffusion stochastic models, J. R. Statist. Soc., 46 (1984), 353-388.   Google Scholar

[19]

M. H. A. Davis, Markov Models and Optimization, Chapman and Hall, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4483-2.  Google Scholar

[20]

B. de Saporta, F. Dufour and H. Zhang, Numerical Methods for Simulation and Optimization of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes, Wiley, 2016.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl, Vector Measures, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1977.  Google Scholar

[22]

V. DumasF. Guillemin and Ph. Robert, A Markovian analysis of additive-increase multiplicative-decrease algorithms, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 34 (2002), 85-111.  doi: 10.1017/S000186780001140X.  Google Scholar

[23]

N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. Part Ⅰ: General Theory, Academic Press, New York-London, 1963.  Google Scholar

[24]

K. -J. Engel and R. Nagel, One Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Springer-Verlag New York, 2000.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. H. A. Davis, Piecewise deterministic Markov control processes with feedback controls and unbounded costs, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 82 (2004), 239-267.  doi: 10.1023/B:ACAP.0000031200.76583.75.  Google Scholar

[26]

R. Gamkrelidze, Principle of Optimal Control Theory Plenum, New York, 1987. Google Scholar

[27]

A. Genadot and M. Thieullen, Averaging for a fully coupled piecewise deterministic Markov process in infinite dimensions, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 44 (2012), 749-773.  doi: 10.1017/S0001867800005863.  Google Scholar

[28]

D. Goreac and M. Martinez, Algebraic invariance conditions in the study of approximate (null-)controllability of Markov switch processes, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 27 (2015), 551-578.  doi: 10.1007/s00498-015-0146-1.  Google Scholar

[29]

R. M. Gray and D. L. Neuhoff, Quantization, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 44 (1998), 2325-2383.  doi: 10.1109/18.720541.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500-544.   Google Scholar

[31]

Q. Hu and W. Yue, Markov Decision Processes with Their Applications, Springer US, 2008.  Google Scholar

[32]

J. Jacod, Multivariate point processes: Predictable projections, Radon-Nikodym derivatives, representation of martingales, Z. Wahrsag. Verw. Gebiete, 34 (1975), 235-253.  doi: 10.1007/BF00536010.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. NikolicN. GrossmanM.S. GrubbJ. BurroneC. Toumazou and P. Degenaar, Photocycles of Channelrhodopsin-2, Photochemistry and Photobiology, 85 (2009), 400-411.  doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00460.x.  Google Scholar

[34]

K. NikolicS. JarvisN. Grossman and S. Schultz, Computational models of Optogenetic tools for controlling neural circuits with light, Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., (2013), 5934-5937.  doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610903.  Google Scholar

[35]

G. PagèsH. Pham and J. Printemps, Handbook of computational and numerical methods in finance, Birkhäuser Boston, (2004), 253-297.   Google Scholar

[36]

K. PakdamanM. Thieullen and G. Wainrib, Reduction of stochastic conductance-based neuron models with time-sacles separation, J. Comput. Neurosci., 32 (2012), 327-346.  doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0355-7.  Google Scholar

[37]

N. S. Papageorgiou, Properties of the relaxed trajectories of evolution equations and optimal control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 27 (1989), 267-288.  doi: 10.1137/0327014.  Google Scholar

[38]

V. RenaultM. Thieullen and E. Trélat, Minimal time spiking in various ChR2-controlled neuron models, J. Math. Biol., (2017), 1-42.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-017-1101-1.  Google Scholar

[39]

M. RiedlerM. Thieullen and G. Wainrib, Limit theorems for infinite-dimensional Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes. Applications to stochastic excitable membrane models, Electron. J. Probab., 17 (2012), 1-48.   Google Scholar

[40]

D. Vermes, Optimal control of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, Stochastics. An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 14 (1985), 165-207.  doi: 10.1080/17442508508833338.  Google Scholar

[41]

J. Warga, Relaxed variational problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 4 (1962), 111-128.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(62)90033-1.  Google Scholar

[42]

J. Warga, Necessary conditions for minimum in relaxed variational problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 4 (1962), 129-145.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(62)90034-3.  Google Scholar

[43]

J. Warga, Optimal Control of Differential and Functional Equations, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972.  Google Scholar

[44]

J. C. Williams and J. Xu et al, Computational optogenetics: Empirically-derived voltage-and light-sensitive Channelrhodopsin-2 model, JPLoS Comput Biol, 9 (2013), e1003220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003220.  Google Scholar

[45]

L. C. Young, Lectures on the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1969.  Google Scholar

[46]

A. A. Yushkevich, On reducing a jump controllable Markov model to a model with discrete time, Theory Probab. Appl., 25 (1980), 58-69.  doi: 10.1137/1125005.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

N. U. Ahmed, Properties of relaxed trajectories for a class of nonlinear evolution equations on a Banach space, SIAM J. Control Optim., 21 (1983), 953-957.  doi: 10.1137/0321058.  Google Scholar

[2]

N. U. Ahmed and K. L. Teo, Optimal control of systems governed by a class of nonlinear evolution equations in a reflexive Banach space, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 25 (1978), 57-81.   Google Scholar

[3]

N. U. Ahmed and X. Xiang, Properties of relaxed trajectories of evolution equations and optimal control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 31 (1993), 1135-1142.  doi: 10.1137/0331053.  Google Scholar

[4]

T. D. Austin, The emergence of the deterministic Hodgkin-Huxley equations as a limit from the underlying stochastic ion-channel mechanism, Ann. Appl. Probab., 18 (2008), 1279-1325.  doi: 10.1214/07-AAP494.  Google Scholar

[5]

E. J. Balder, A general denseness result for relaxed control theory, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 30 (1984), 463-475.  doi: 10.1017/S0004972700002185.  Google Scholar

[6]

D. Bertsekas and S. Shreve, Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-Time Case, Academic Press, 1978.  Google Scholar

[7]

P. Billingsley, Convergence Of Probability Measures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968.  Google Scholar

[8]

E. S. BoydenF. ZhangE. BambergG. Nagel and K. Deisseroth, Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity, Nature Neuroscience, 8 (2005), 1263-1268.  doi: 10.1038/nn1525.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. BrandejskyB. de Saporta and F. Dufour, Numerical methods for the exit time of a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 44 (2012), 196-225.  doi: 10.1017/S0001867800005504.  Google Scholar

[10]

E. Buckwar and M. Riedler, An exact stochastic hybrid model of excitable membranes including spatio-temporal evolution, J. Math. Biol., 63 (2011), 1051-1093.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0395-z.  Google Scholar

[11]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, Optimal control of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes with finite time horizon, Modern Trends of Controlled Stochastic Processes: Theory and Applications, (2010), 144-160.   Google Scholar

[12]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, AMDP algorithms for portfolio optimization problems in pure jump markets, Finance Stoch., 13 (2009), 591-611.  doi: 10.1007/s00780-009-0093-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

N. Bäuerle and U. Rieder, Markov Decision Processes With Applications To Finance, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. Google Scholar

[14]

O. Costa and F. Dufour, Stability and ergodicity of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, SIAM J. of Control and Opt., 47 (2008), 1053-1077.  doi: 10.1137/060670109.  Google Scholar

[15]

O. Costa and F. Dufour, Singular perturbation for the discounted continuous control of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes, Appl. Math. and Opt., 63 (2011), 357-384.  doi: 10.1007/s00245-010-9124-7.  Google Scholar

[16]

O.L.V. CostaC.A. B RaymundoF. Dufour and K. Gonzalez, Optimal stopping with continuous control of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, Stoch. Stoch. Rep., 70 (2000), 41-73.  doi: 10.1080/17442500008834245.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. CruduA. DebusscheA. Muller and O. Radulescu, Convergence of stochastic gene networks to hybrid piecewise deterministic processe, Ann. Appl. Prob., 22 (2012), 1822-1859.  doi: 10.1214/11-AAP814.  Google Scholar

[18]

M. H. A. Davis, Piecewise-Deterministic Markov Processes: A general class of non-diffusion stochastic models, J. R. Statist. Soc., 46 (1984), 353-388.   Google Scholar

[19]

M. H. A. Davis, Markov Models and Optimization, Chapman and Hall, 1993. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4483-2.  Google Scholar

[20]

B. de Saporta, F. Dufour and H. Zhang, Numerical Methods for Simulation and Optimization of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes, Wiley, 2016.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl, Vector Measures, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1977.  Google Scholar

[22]

V. DumasF. Guillemin and Ph. Robert, A Markovian analysis of additive-increase multiplicative-decrease algorithms, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 34 (2002), 85-111.  doi: 10.1017/S000186780001140X.  Google Scholar

[23]

N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. Part Ⅰ: General Theory, Academic Press, New York-London, 1963.  Google Scholar

[24]

K. -J. Engel and R. Nagel, One Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Springer-Verlag New York, 2000.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. H. A. Davis, Piecewise deterministic Markov control processes with feedback controls and unbounded costs, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 82 (2004), 239-267.  doi: 10.1023/B:ACAP.0000031200.76583.75.  Google Scholar

[26]

R. Gamkrelidze, Principle of Optimal Control Theory Plenum, New York, 1987. Google Scholar

[27]

A. Genadot and M. Thieullen, Averaging for a fully coupled piecewise deterministic Markov process in infinite dimensions, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 44 (2012), 749-773.  doi: 10.1017/S0001867800005863.  Google Scholar

[28]

D. Goreac and M. Martinez, Algebraic invariance conditions in the study of approximate (null-)controllability of Markov switch processes, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 27 (2015), 551-578.  doi: 10.1007/s00498-015-0146-1.  Google Scholar

[29]

R. M. Gray and D. L. Neuhoff, Quantization, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 44 (1998), 2325-2383.  doi: 10.1109/18.720541.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500-544.   Google Scholar

[31]

Q. Hu and W. Yue, Markov Decision Processes with Their Applications, Springer US, 2008.  Google Scholar

[32]

J. Jacod, Multivariate point processes: Predictable projections, Radon-Nikodym derivatives, representation of martingales, Z. Wahrsag. Verw. Gebiete, 34 (1975), 235-253.  doi: 10.1007/BF00536010.  Google Scholar

[33]

K. NikolicN. GrossmanM.S. GrubbJ. BurroneC. Toumazou and P. Degenaar, Photocycles of Channelrhodopsin-2, Photochemistry and Photobiology, 85 (2009), 400-411.  doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00460.x.  Google Scholar

[34]

K. NikolicS. JarvisN. Grossman and S. Schultz, Computational models of Optogenetic tools for controlling neural circuits with light, Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., (2013), 5934-5937.  doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610903.  Google Scholar

[35]

G. PagèsH. Pham and J. Printemps, Handbook of computational and numerical methods in finance, Birkhäuser Boston, (2004), 253-297.   Google Scholar

[36]

K. PakdamanM. Thieullen and G. Wainrib, Reduction of stochastic conductance-based neuron models with time-sacles separation, J. Comput. Neurosci., 32 (2012), 327-346.  doi: 10.1007/s10827-011-0355-7.  Google Scholar

[37]

N. S. Papageorgiou, Properties of the relaxed trajectories of evolution equations and optimal control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 27 (1989), 267-288.  doi: 10.1137/0327014.  Google Scholar

[38]

V. RenaultM. Thieullen and E. Trélat, Minimal time spiking in various ChR2-controlled neuron models, J. Math. Biol., (2017), 1-42.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-017-1101-1.  Google Scholar

[39]

M. RiedlerM. Thieullen and G. Wainrib, Limit theorems for infinite-dimensional Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes. Applications to stochastic excitable membrane models, Electron. J. Probab., 17 (2012), 1-48.   Google Scholar

[40]

D. Vermes, Optimal control of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, Stochastics. An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 14 (1985), 165-207.  doi: 10.1080/17442508508833338.  Google Scholar

[41]

J. Warga, Relaxed variational problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 4 (1962), 111-128.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(62)90033-1.  Google Scholar

[42]

J. Warga, Necessary conditions for minimum in relaxed variational problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 4 (1962), 129-145.  doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(62)90034-3.  Google Scholar

[43]

J. Warga, Optimal Control of Differential and Functional Equations, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972.  Google Scholar

[44]

J. C. Williams and J. Xu et al, Computational optogenetics: Empirically-derived voltage-and light-sensitive Channelrhodopsin-2 model, JPLoS Comput Biol, 9 (2013), e1003220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003220.  Google Scholar

[45]

L. C. Young, Lectures on the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1969.  Google Scholar

[46]

A. A. Yushkevich, On reducing a jump controllable Markov model to a model with discrete time, Theory Probab. Appl., 25 (1980), 58-69.  doi: 10.1137/1125005.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Simplified four states ChR2 channel : $\varepsilon_1$, $\varepsilon_2$, $e_{12}$, $e_{21}$, $K_{d1}$, $K_{d2}$ and $K_r$ are positive constants
Figure 2.  Simplified ChR2 three states model
Figure 3.  ChR2 three states model
Figure 4.  ChR2 channel : $K_{a1}$, $K_{a2}$, and $K_{d2}$ are positive constants defined by:
Table 1.  Expression of the individual jump rate functions and the Hodgkin-Huxley model
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_1} = \left\{ {{n_0},{n_1},{n_2},{n_3},{n_4}} \right\}} :$
$\sigma_{n_0,n_1}(v,u) = 4\alpha_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_1,n_2}(v,u) = 3\alpha_n(v)$,
$\sigma_{n_2,n_3}(v,u) = 2\alpha_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_3,n_4}(v,u) = \alpha_n(v)$
$\sigma_{n_4,n_3}(v,u) = 4\beta_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_3,n_2}(v,u) = 3\beta_n(v)$,
$\sigma_{n_2,n_1}(v,u) = 2\beta_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_1,n_0}(v,u) = \beta_n(v)$.
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_2} = \left\{ {{m_0}{h_1},{m_1}{h_1},{m_2}{h_1},{m_3}{h_1},{m_0}{h_0},{m_1}{h_0},{m_2}{h_0},{m_3}{h_0}} \right\}} :$ :
$\sigma_{m_0h_1,m_1h_1}(v,u)=\sigma_{m_0h_0,m_1h_0}(v,u) = 3\alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_1h_1,m_2h_1}(v,u) =\sigma_{m_1h_0,m_2h_0}(v,u) = 2\alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_2h_1,m_3h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_2h_0,m_3h_0}(v,u) = \alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_3h_1,m_2h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_3h_0,m_2h_0}(v,u) = 3\beta_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_2h_1,m_1h_1}(v,u) =\sigma_{m_2h_0,m_1h_0}(v,u) = 2\beta_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_1h_1,m_0h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_1h_0,m_0h_0}(v,u) = \beta_m(v)$.
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_{ChR2}} = \left\{ {{o_1},{o_2},{c_1},{c_2}} \right\}} :$
$\sigma_{c_1,o_1}(v,u) = \varepsilon_1 u $,$\sigma_{o_1,c_1}(v,u) = K_{d1}$,
$\sigma_{o_1,o_2}(v,u) = e_{12} $,$\sigma_{o_2,o_1}(v,u) = e_{21}$
$\sigma_{o_2,c_2}(v,u) = K_{d2} $,$\sigma_{c_2,o_2}(v,u) = \varepsilon_2 u $,
$\sigma_{c_2,c_1}(v,u) = K_r$.
$\alpha_n(v)=\frac{0.1-0.01v}{e^{1-0.1v}-1}$,$\beta_n(v)=0.125e^{-\frac{v}{80}}$,
$\alpha_m(v)=\frac{2.5-0.1v}{e^{2.5-0.1v}-1}$,$\beta_m(v)=4e^{-\frac{v}{18}}$,
$\alpha_h(v)=0.07e^{-\frac{v}{20}}$,$\beta_h(v)=\frac{1}{e^{3-0.1v}+1}$.
$(HH)\left\{ \begin{aligned} C \dot{V}(t)&= \bar{g}_Kn^4(t)(E_K - V(t)) +\bar{g}_{Na}m^3(t)h(t)(E_{Na}-V(t))\\ & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ + g_L(E_L-V(t)) + I_{ext}(t),\\ \dot{n}(t)&= \alpha_n(V(t))(1-n(t)) - \beta_n(V(t))n(t),\\ \dot{m}(t)&= \alpha_m(V(t))(1-m(t)) - \beta_m(V(t))m(t),\\ \dot{h}(t)&= \alpha_h(V(t))(1-h(t)) - \beta_h(V(t))h(t). \end{aligned} \right.$
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_1} = \left\{ {{n_0},{n_1},{n_2},{n_3},{n_4}} \right\}} :$
$\sigma_{n_0,n_1}(v,u) = 4\alpha_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_1,n_2}(v,u) = 3\alpha_n(v)$,
$\sigma_{n_2,n_3}(v,u) = 2\alpha_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_3,n_4}(v,u) = \alpha_n(v)$
$\sigma_{n_4,n_3}(v,u) = 4\beta_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_3,n_2}(v,u) = 3\beta_n(v)$,
$\sigma_{n_2,n_1}(v,u) = 2\beta_n(v)$,$\sigma_{n_1,n_0}(v,u) = \beta_n(v)$.
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_2} = \left\{ {{m_0}{h_1},{m_1}{h_1},{m_2}{h_1},{m_3}{h_1},{m_0}{h_0},{m_1}{h_0},{m_2}{h_0},{m_3}{h_0}} \right\}} :$ :
$\sigma_{m_0h_1,m_1h_1}(v,u)=\sigma_{m_0h_0,m_1h_0}(v,u) = 3\alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_1h_1,m_2h_1}(v,u) =\sigma_{m_1h_0,m_2h_0}(v,u) = 2\alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_2h_1,m_3h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_2h_0,m_3h_0}(v,u) = \alpha_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_3h_1,m_2h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_3h_0,m_2h_0}(v,u) = 3\beta_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_2h_1,m_1h_1}(v,u) =\sigma_{m_2h_0,m_1h_0}(v,u) = 2\beta_m(v)$,
$\sigma_{m_1h_1,m_0h_1}(v,u) = \sigma_{m_1h_0,m_0h_0}(v,u) = \beta_m(v)$.
$\underline {{\rm{In}}\;\;{D_{ChR2}} = \left\{ {{o_1},{o_2},{c_1},{c_2}} \right\}} :$
$\sigma_{c_1,o_1}(v,u) = \varepsilon_1 u $,$\sigma_{o_1,c_1}(v,u) = K_{d1}$,
$\sigma_{o_1,o_2}(v,u) = e_{12} $,$\sigma_{o_2,o_1}(v,u) = e_{21}$
$\sigma_{o_2,c_2}(v,u) = K_{d2} $,$\sigma_{c_2,o_2}(v,u) = \varepsilon_2 u $,
$\sigma_{c_2,c_1}(v,u) = K_r$.
$\alpha_n(v)=\frac{0.1-0.01v}{e^{1-0.1v}-1}$,$\beta_n(v)=0.125e^{-\frac{v}{80}}$,
$\alpha_m(v)=\frac{2.5-0.1v}{e^{2.5-0.1v}-1}$,$\beta_m(v)=4e^{-\frac{v}{18}}$,
$\alpha_h(v)=0.07e^{-\frac{v}{20}}$,$\beta_h(v)=\frac{1}{e^{3-0.1v}+1}$.
$(HH)\left\{ \begin{aligned} C \dot{V}(t)&= \bar{g}_Kn^4(t)(E_K - V(t)) +\bar{g}_{Na}m^3(t)h(t)(E_{Na}-V(t))\\ & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ + g_L(E_L-V(t)) + I_{ext}(t),\\ \dot{n}(t)&= \alpha_n(V(t))(1-n(t)) - \beta_n(V(t))n(t),\\ \dot{m}(t)&= \alpha_m(V(t))(1-m(t)) - \beta_m(V(t))m(t),\\ \dot{h}(t)&= \alpha_h(V(t))(1-h(t)) - \beta_h(V(t))h(t). \end{aligned} \right.$
[1]

Stefan Doboszczak, Manil T. Mohan, Sivaguru S. Sritharan. Pontryagin maximum principle for the optimal control of linearized compressible navier-stokes equations with state constraints. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020110

[2]

Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019

[3]

Huiying Fan, Tao Ma. Parabolic equations involving Laguerre operators and weighted mixed-norm estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5487-5508. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020249

[4]

Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443

[5]

Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046

[6]

Hai Huang, Xianlong Fu. Optimal control problems for a neutral integro-differential system with infinite delay. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020107

[7]

Youming Guo, Tingting Li. Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020347

[8]

Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels. Deep quench approximation and optimal control of general Cahn–Hilliard systems with fractional operators and double obstacle potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 243-271. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020213

[9]

Bernard Bonnard, Jérémy Rouot. Geometric optimal techniques to control the muscular force response to functional electrical stimulation using a non-isometric force-fatigue model. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2020032

[10]

Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $ L^2- $norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077

[11]

Peter Poláčik, Pavol Quittner. Entire and ancient solutions of a supercritical semilinear heat equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 413-438. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020136

[12]

Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi. A new methodology for solving bi-criterion fractional stochastic programming. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020054

[13]

Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167

[14]

Mark F. Demers. Uniqueness and exponential mixing for the measure of maximal entropy for piecewise hyperbolic maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 217-256. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020217

[15]

Djamel Aaid, Amel Noui, Özen Özer. Piecewise quadratic bounding functions for finding real roots of polynomials. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 63-73. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020015

[16]

Meilan Cai, Maoan Han. Limit cycle bifurcations in a class of piecewise smooth cubic systems with multiple parameters. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 55-75. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020257

[17]

Touria Karite, Ali Boutoulout. Global and regional constrained controllability for distributed parabolic linear systems: RHUM approach. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020055

[18]

Ahmad Z. Fino, Wenhui Chen. A global existence result for two-dimensional semilinear strongly damped wave equation with mixed nonlinearity in an exterior domain. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5387-5411. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020243

[19]

José Madrid, João P. G. Ramos. On optimal autocorrelation inequalities on the real line. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 369-388. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020271

[20]

Haixiang Yao, Ping Chen, Miao Zhang, Xun Li. Dynamic discrete-time portfolio selection for defined contribution pension funds with inflation risk. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020166

2019 Impact Factor: 1.053

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (32)
  • HTML views (55)
  • Cited by (2)

[Back to Top]