Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

A two-dimensional data-driven model for traffic flow on highways

  • * Corresponding author: Giuseppe Visconti

    * Corresponding author: Giuseppe Visconti
Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure(12) Related Papers Cited by
  • Based on experimental traffic data obtained from German and US highways, we propose a novel two-dimensional first-order macroscopic traffic flow model. The goal is to reproduce a detailed description of traffic dynamics for the real road geometry. In our approach both the dynamics along the road and across the lanes is continuous. The closure relations, being necessary to complete the hydrodynamics equation, are obtained by regression on fundamental diagram data. Comparison with prediction of one-dimensional models shows the improvement in performance of the novel model.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 90B20, 35L65; Secondary: 35Q91, 91B74.


    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Experimental diagrams from the A3 German highway using $20$ minutes of recorded video. Top row: flux-density (left) and speed-density (right) diagrams in $x$-direction. Bottom row: flux-density (left) and speed-density (right) diagrams in $y$-direction

    Figure 2.  Two-dimensional trajectories extrapolated from the German data-set. In red we show the trajectories of vehicles crossing a lane while traveling

    Figure 3.  Fundamental diagrams in $x$ direction. Left: macroscopic data computed each $0.2$ seconds and aggregated over $60$ seconds. Right: macroscopic data computed each $1$ second and aggregated over $30$ seconds

    Figure 4.  Data-fitting of the experimental diagrams. Top row: functions approximating the flux-density (left) and speed-density (right) diagrams in $x$-direction. Bottom row: functions approximating flux-density (left) and speed-density (right) diagrams in $y$-direction

    Figure 5.  Log-log graph of the convergence test on the Gaussian initial datum (left panel) and on the double sine wave (right panel)

    Figure 6.  Top-left: initial density profile at time $T_{\text{init}} = 407.4$ seconds. Top-right: simulated density profile after $0.5$ seconds. Bottom-left: real density profile at final time. Bottom-right: difference between the simulated and the real density profiles

    Figure 7.  Top-left: initial density profile at time $T_{\text{init}} = 870.9$ seconds. Top-right: simulated density profile after $0.5$ seconds. Bottom-left: real density profile at final time. Bottom-right: difference between the simulated and the real density profiles

    Figure 8.  Left: $15$ seconds of simulation between $400-415$ seconds, showing the $1$-norm error each $0.5$ seconds (the top panel). Right: $15$ seconds of simulation between $863-878$ seconds, showing the $1$-norm error each $0.5$ seconds (the top panel). The mid and the bottom panels show the variation of density in the time intervals and on the whole recorded time period, respectively

    Figure 9.  Error plots comparing the predictive accuracy of the 1D model (2) (red data) and of the 2D model (3) (blue data). Each panel refers to different initial density profiles computed by using the kernel density estimation approach. On the $x$-axis we show the percentage of the traveling time with respect to the total time to cover the road section at the maximum speed

    Figure 10.  Error plots comparing the predictive prediction of traveling time of the 1D model (2) (red data) and of the 2D model (3) (blue data). On the $x$-axis we show the percentage of the traveling time with respect to the total time to cover the road section at the maximum speed

    Figure 11.  Relative error between $\boldsymbol{E}_{\boldsymbol{\alpha}^{\boldsymbol{y}}, \boldsymbol{p}^{\boldsymbol{y}}}$ and $E_{\alpha^y_{\text{opt}}, p^y_{\text{opt}}}(T_{\text{fin}})$ for each pair of possible parameters in the vectors $\boldsymbol{\alpha}^{\boldsymbol{y}}$ and $\boldsymbol{p}^{\boldsymbol{y}}$

    Figure 12.  Experimental diagrams in $y$-direction resulting from the US101 highway and using $15$ minutes of recorded data (07:50 - 08:05 a.m.). The macroscopic quantities are obtained by aggregating each $100$ meter sections and every $1$ second. Left panel: flux-density diagram. Right: speed-density diagram

  • [1] Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation. Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM), Available from: http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm.
    [2] Minnesota Department of Transportation. Mn/DOT Traffic Data, Available from: http://data.dot.state.mn.us/datatools.
    [3] Mobile Millennium Project, Available from: http://traffic.berkeley.edu.
    [4] 75 Years of the Fundamental Diagram for Traffic Flow Theory: Greenshields Symposium, Transportation Research Board, Circular E-C149. 2011.
    [5] S. Amin et al., Mobile century – Using GPS mobile phones as traffic sensors: A field experiment. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, New York. Nov. 2008.
    [6] D. Aregba-Driollet and R. Natalini, Discrete Kinetic Schemes for Multidimensional Conservation Laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 37 (2000), 1973-2004.  doi: 10.1137/S0036142998343075.
    [7] A. Aw and M. Rascle, Resurrection of "second order" models of traffic flow, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 916-938 (electronic).  doi: 10.1137/S0036139997332099.
    [8] A. M. Bayen and C. G. Claudel, Lax-Hopf based incorporation of internal boundary conditions into Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Part Ⅰ: Theory, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 55 (2010), 1142-1157.  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2041976.
    [9] A. M. Bayen and C. G. Claudel, Convex formulations of data assimilation problems for a class of hamilton-jacobi equations, SIAM J. Control Optim., 49 (2011), 383-402.  doi: 10.1137/090778754.
    [10] N. Bellomo and C. Dogbé, On the modeling of traffic and crowds: A survey of models, speculations, and perspectives, SIAM Rev., 53 (2011), 409-463.  doi: 10.1137/090746677.
    [11] S. Benzoni-Gavage and R.M. Colombo, An $n$ -populations model for traffic flow, Eur. J. Appl. Math., 14 (2003), 587-612.  doi: 10.1017/S0956792503005266.
    [12] F. BerthelinP. DegondM. Delitala and M. Rascle, A model for the formation and evolution of traffic jams, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 187 (2008), 185-220.  doi: 10.1007/s00205-007-0061-9.
    [13] S. BlandinG. BrettiA. Cutolo and B. Piccoli, Numerical simulations of traffic data via fluid dynamic approach, Appl. Math. Comput., 210 (2009), 441-454.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.057.
    [14] R. CaoA. Cuevas and W. G. Manteiga, A comparative study of several smoothing methods in density estimation, Comput. Stat. Data. An., 17 (1994), 153-176.  doi: 10.1016/0167-9473(92)00066-Z.
    [15] B. N. Chetverushkin, N. G. Churbanova, I. R. Furmanov and M. A. Trapeznikova, 2D Micro-and Macroscopic Models for Simulation of Heterogeneous Traffic Flows, Proceedings of the ECCOMAS CFD 2010, V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2010.
    [16] B. N. Chetverushkin, N. G. Churbanova, A. B. Sukhinova and M. A. Trapeznikova, Congested Traffic Simulation Based on a 2D Hydrodynamical Model, Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Computational Mechanics and 5th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Science and Engineering, WCCM8 & ECCOMAS, 2008.
    [17] R. CourantK. O. Friedrichs and H. Lewy, Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik, Mathematische Annalen, 100 (1928), 32-74.  doi: 10.1007/BF01448839.
    [18] I. CraveroG. PuppoM. Semplice and G. Visconti, CWENO: Uniformly accurate reconstructions for balance laws, Math. Comp., 87 (2018), 1689-1719.  doi: 10.1090/mcom/3273.
    [19] C. F. Daganzo, The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 28 (1994), 269-287.  doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7.
    [20] C. F. Daganzo, Requiem for second order fluid approximations of traffic flow, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 29 (1995), 277-286.  doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00007-Z.
    [21] C. F. Daganzo, In traffic flow, cellular automata = kinematic waves, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 40 (2006), 396-403.  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2005.05.004.
    [22] S. FanM. Herty and B. Seibold, Comparative model accuracy of a data-fitted generalized Aw-Rascle-Zhang model, Netw. Heterog. Media, 9 (2014), 239-268.  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.239.
    [23] S. Fan and B. Seibold, A comparison of data-fitted first order traffic models and their second order generalizations via trajectory and sensor data, arXiv: 1208.0382, (2012).
    [24] M. Garavello and B. Piccoli, Traffic Flow on Networks, AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS), Springfield, MO, 2006.
    [25] P. Goatin, The Aw-Rascle vehicular traffic flow model with phase transitions, Math. Comput. Modeling, 44 (2006), 287-303.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.01.016.
    [26] S. K. Godunov, Finite difference methods for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics, Mat. Sbornik, 47 (1959), 271-306. 
    [27] B. D. Greenshields, A study of traffic capacity, Proc. Highway Res., 14 (1935), 448-477. 
    [28] A. Harten, High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comp. Phys., 49 (1983), 357-393.  doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5.
    [29] D. Helbing, Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems, Reviews of Modern Physics, 73 (2001), 1067-1141.  doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1067.
    [30] M. Herty and R. Illner, Analytical and numerical investigations of refined macroscopic traffic flow models, Kinet. Relat. Models, 3 (2010), 311-333.  doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.311.
    [31] M. Herty and L. Pareschi, Fokker-Planck asymptotics for traffic flow models, Kinet. Relat. Models, 3 (2010), 165-179.  doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.165.
    [32] M. Herty, S. Moutari and G. Visconti, Macroscopic modeling of multi-lane motorways using a two-dimensional second-order model of traffic flow, Submitted, arXiv: 1710.07209, (2017).
    [33] M. Herty, A. Tosin, G. Visconti and M. Zanella, Hybrid stochastic kinetic description of two-dimensional traffic dynamics, Submitted, arXiv: 1711.02424, (2017).
    [34] M. Herty and G. Visconti, Analysis of risk levels for traffic on a multi-lane highway, Submitted, arXiv: 1710. 05752, (2017).
    [35] K. Heun, Neue Methoden zur approximativen Integration der Differentialgleichungen einer unabhängigen Veränderlichen, Z. Math. Phys, 45 (1900), 23-38. 
    [36] S. P. Hoogendoorn, Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation: CT4821, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences (TU Delft), 2007.
    [37] R. Illner, A. Klar and T. Materne, Vlasov-Fokker-Planck models for multilane traffic flow, Commun. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), 1–12, URL http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cms/1118150395. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2003.v1.n1.a1.
    [38] M. C. JonesJ. S. Marron and S. J. Sheather, A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation, J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 91 (1996), 401-407.  doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476701.
    [39] B. S. Kerner, The Physics of Traffic, Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-40986-1.
    [40] B. S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser, Cluster effect in initially homogeneous traffic flow, Phys. Rev. E, 48 (1993), R2335-R2338.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R2335.
    [41] B. S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser, Structure and parameters of clusters in traffic flow, Phys. Rev. E, 50 (1994), 54-83.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.54.
    [42] A. Klar and R. Wegener, A hierarchy of models for multilane vehicular traffic. Ⅰ. Modeling, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 59 (1999), 983-1001 (electronic).  doi: 10.1137/S0036139997326946.
    [43] A. Klar and R. Wegener, A hierarchy of models for multilane vehicular traffic. Ⅱ. Numerical investigations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 59 (1999), 1002-1011 (electronic).  doi: 10.1137/S0036139997326958.
    [44] A. Klar and R. Wegener, Kinetic derivation of macroscopic anticipation models for vehicular traffic, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 1749-1766 (electronic).  doi: 10.1137/S0036139999356181.
    [45] J. P. Lebacque, Les modeles macroscopiques du traffic, Annales des Ponts., 67 (1993), 24-45. 
    [46] W. Leutzbach, Introduction to the Theory of Traffic Flow, Springer, New York, 1988. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61353-1.
    [47] R. J. LeVeque, Finite-Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791253.
    [48] M. J. Lighthill and G. B. Whitham, On kinematic waves. Ⅱ. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads, Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A., 229 (1955), 317-345.  doi: 10.1098/rspa.1955.0089.
    [49] S. Maerivoet and B. De Moor, Traffic Flow Theory, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2005.
    [50] G. F. Newell, A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic Ⅱ: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 27 (1993), 289-303.  doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90039-D.
    [51] E. Parzen, On estimation of a probability density function and model, Ann. Math. Statist., 33 (1962), 1065-1076.  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704472.
    [52] H. J. Payne, Models of freeway traffic and control, Math. Models Publ. Sys., Simul. Council Proc., 28 (1971), 51-61. 
    [53] H. J. Payne, FREFLO: A macroscopic simulation model for freeway traffic, Transportation Research Record, 722 (1979), 68-77. 
    [54] W. F. Phillips, A kinetic model for traffic flow with continuum implications, Transportation Planning and Technology, 5 (1979), 131-138.  doi: 10.1080/03081067908717157.
    [55] B. Piccoli and A. Tosin, Vehicular traffic: A review of continuum mathematical models, in Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems. Vols. 1–3, Springer, New York, 2012, 1748–1770. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1806-1_112.
    [56] I. Prigogine and R. Herman, Kinetic Theory of Vehicular Traffic, American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York, 1971.
    [57] G. PuppoM. SempliceA. Tosin and G. Visconti, Fundamental diagrams in traffic flow: The case of heterogeneous kinetic models, Commun. Math. Sci., 14 (2016), 643-669.  doi: 10.4310/CMS.2016.v14.n3.a3.
    [58] G. PuppoM. SempliceA. Tosin and G. Visconti, Analysis of a multi-population kinetic model for traffic flow, Commun. Math. Sci., 15 (2017), 379-412.  doi: 10.4310/CMS.2017.v15.n2.a5.
    [59] P. I. Richards, Shock waves on the highway, Operations Res., 4 (1956), 42-51.  doi: 10.1287/opre.4.1.42.
    [60] M. Rosenblatt, Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function, Ann. Math. Statist., 27 (1956), 832-837.  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177728190.
    [61] M. D. Rosini, Macroscopic Models for Vehicular Flows and Crowd Dynamics: Theory and Applications, Understanding Complex Systems, Springer, Heidelberg, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00155-5.
    [62] C. W. Shu, High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Rev., 51 (2009), 82-126.  doi: 10.1137/070679065.
    [63] G. Strang, On the construction and comparison of difference schemes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 5 (1968), 506-517.  doi: 10.1137/0705041.
    [64] A.B. SukhinovaM.A. TrapeznikovaB.N. Chetverushkin and N.G. Churbanova, Two-dimensional macroscopic model of traffic flows, Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 1 (2009), 669-676.  doi: 10.1134/S2070048209060027.
    [65] E. F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, 2009. doi: 10.1007/b79761.
    [66] R. T. Underwood, Speed, Volume, And Density Relationships: Quality and theory of traffic flow, Yale Bureau of Highway Traffic, (1961), 141–188.
    [67] B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme Ⅲ. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow, J. Comp. Phys., 23 (1977), 263-275. 
    [68] H. M. Zhang, A non-equilibrium traffic model devoid of gas-like behavior, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 36 (2002), 275-290.  doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00050-3.
  • 加载中



Article Metrics

HTML views(817) PDF downloads(567) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors



    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint