American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

June  2019, 14(2): 411-444. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019017

Homogenization and exact controllability for problems with imperfect interface

 1 Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo Ⅱ, 132, 84084, Fisciano (SA), Italy 2 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università del Sannio, Via Port'Arsa, 11, 82100, Benevento (BN), Italy

* Corresponding author: Sara Monsurrò

Received  November 2018 Published  April 2019

The first aim of this paper is to study, by means of the periodic unfolding method, the homogenization of elliptic problems with source terms converging in a space of functions less regular than the usual $L^2$, in an $\varepsilon$-periodic two component composite with an imperfect transmission condition on the interface. Then we exploit this result to describe the asymptotic behaviour of the exact controls and the corresponding states of hyperbolic problems set in composites with the same structure and presenting the same condition on the interface. The exact controllability is developed by applying the Hilbert Uniqueness Method, introduced by J. -L. Lions, which leads us to the construction of the exact controls as solutions of suitable transposed problem.

Citation: Sara Monsurrò, Carmen Perugia. Homogenization and exact controllability for problems with imperfect interface. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (2) : 411-444. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019017
References:

show all references

References:
The two-component domain $\Omega$
The sets $\widehat{\Omega }^{\varepsilon }$ and $\Lambda^\varepsilon$
 [1] Sergei Avdonin, Jeff Park, Luz de Teresa. The Kalman condition for the boundary controllability of coupled 1-d wave equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020, 9 (1) : 255-273. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020005 [2] Hakima Bessaih, Yalchin Efendiev, Florin Maris. Homogenization of the evolution Stokes equation in a perforated domain with a stochastic Fourier boundary condition. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (2) : 343-367. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.343 [3] C. Bandle, Y. Kabeya, Hirokazu Ninomiya. Imperfect bifurcations in nonlinear elliptic equations on spherical caps. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (5) : 1189-1208. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1189 [4] S. S. Krigman. Exact boundary controllability of Maxwell's equations with weak conductivity in the heterogeneous medium inside a general domain. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 590-601. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.590 [5] Ning-An Lai, Jinglei Zhao. Potential well and exact boundary controllability for radial semilinear wave equations on Schwarzschild spacetime. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (3) : 1317-1325. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1317 [6] Umberto De Maio, Akamabadath K. Nandakumaran, Carmen Perugia. Exact internal controllability for the wave equation in a domain with oscillating boundary with Neumann boundary condition. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2015, 4 (3) : 325-346. doi: 10.3934/eect.2015.4.325 [7] Larissa V. Fardigola. Transformation operators in controllability problems for the wave equations with variable coefficients on a half-axis controlled by the Dirichlet boundary condition. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (1) : 31-53. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.31 [8] Mohammed Aassila. Exact boundary controllability of a coupled system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2000, 6 (3) : 665-672. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.665 [9] Abdelaziz Bennour, Farid Ammar Khodja, Djamel Teniou. Exact and approximate controllability of coupled one-dimensional hyperbolic equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (4) : 487-516. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017025 [10] Yanqing Wang, Donghui Yang, Jiongmin Yong, Zhiyong Yu. Exact controllability of linear stochastic differential equations and related problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (2) : 305-345. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017011 [11] Irena Lasiecka, Roberto Triggiani. Global exact controllability of semilinear wave equations by a double compactness/uniqueness argument. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 556-565. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.556 [12] Cung The Anh, Vu Manh Toi. Local exact controllability to trajectories of the magneto-micropolar fluid equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 357-379. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017019 [13] Paul Sacks, Mahamadi Warma. Semi-linear elliptic and elliptic-parabolic equations with Wentzell boundary conditions and $L^1$-data. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (2) : 761-787. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.761 [14] Peter Šepitka. Riccati equations for linear Hamiltonian systems without controllability condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (4) : 1685-1730. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019074 [15] Noriaki Yamazaki. Doubly nonlinear evolution equations associated with elliptic-parabolic free boundary problems. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 920-929. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.920 [16] Lahcen Maniar, Martin Meyries, Roland Schnaubelt. Null controllability for parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2017, 6 (3) : 381-407. doi: 10.3934/eect.2017020 [17] E. N. Dancer. Some examples on solution structures for weakly nonlinear elliptic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 12 (5) : 817-826. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.817 [18] Jamel Ben Amara, Hedi Bouzidi. Exact boundary controllability for the Boussinesq equation with variable coefficients. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (3) : 403-415. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018020 [19] Klaus-Jochen Engel, Marjeta Kramar FijavŽ. Exact and positive controllability of boundary control systems. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (2) : 319-337. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017014 [20] Lizhi Ruan, Changjiang Zhu. Boundary layer for nonlinear evolution equations with damping and diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (1) : 331-352. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.331

2018 Impact Factor: 0.871