2003, 2003(Special): 359-364. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.359

A nonlinear controlled system of differential equations describing the process of production and sales of a consumer good

1. 

Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX 76204

2. 

Department of Computer Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State Lomonosov University, Moscow, 119992

Received  July 2002 Published  April 2003

A nonlinear controlled system of differential equations has been constructed to describe the process of production and sales of a consumer good. This model can be controlled either by the rate of production or by the price of the good. The attainable sets of corresponding controlled systems are studied. It is shown that in both cases the boundaries of these sets are the unions of two two-parameter surfaces. It is proved that every point on the boundaries of the attainable sets is a result of piecewise constant controls with at most two switchings. Attainable sets for different values of parameters of the model will be demonstrated using MAPLE.
Citation: Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. A nonlinear controlled system of differential equations describing the process of production and sales of a consumer good. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 359-364. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.359
[1]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov, Andrei Korobeinikov. Parametrization of the attainable set for a nonlinear control model of a biochemical process. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (4) : 1067-1094. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1067

[2]

Jonas Lampart. A remark on the attainable set of the Schrödinger equation. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (3) : 461-469. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020075

[3]

Mariko Arisawa, Hitoshi Ishii. Some properties of ergodic attractors for controlled dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1998, 4 (1) : 43-54. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.43

[4]

Sebastián Ferrer, Francisco Crespo. Parametric quartic Hamiltonian model. A unified treatment of classic integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 479-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.479

[5]

Ghendrih Philippe, Hauray Maxime, Anne Nouri. Derivation of a gyrokinetic model. Existence and uniqueness of specific stationary solution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (4) : 707-725. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.707

[6]

Shohel Ahmed, Abdul Alim, Sumaiya Rahman. A controlled treatment strategy applied to HIV immunology model. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (3) : 299-314. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018019

[7]

Faker Ben Belgacem. Uniqueness for an ill-posed reaction-dispersion model. Application to organic pollution in stream-waters. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 163-181. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.163

[8]

R. P. Gupta, Peeyush Chandra, Malay Banerjee. Dynamical complexity of a prey-predator model with nonlinear predator harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (2) : 423-443. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.423

[9]

Mikhail I. Belishev, Sergey A. Simonov. A canonical model of the one-dimensional dynamical Dirac system with boundary control. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021  doi: 10.3934/eect.2021003

[10]

Tan H. Cao, Boris S. Mordukhovich. Optimality conditions for a controlled sweeping process with applications to the crowd motion model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (2) : 267-306. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017014

[11]

Steinar Evje, Aksel Hiorth. A mathematical model for dynamic wettability alteration controlled by water-rock chemistry. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (2) : 217-256. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.217

[12]

Peter Benner, Tobias Breiten, Carsten Hartmann, Burkhard Schmidt. Model reduction of controlled Fokker–Planck and Liouville–von Neumann equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020, 7 (1) : 1-33. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2020001

[13]

Chongyang Liu, Zhaohua Gong, Enmin Feng, Hongchao Yin. Modelling and optimal control for nonlinear multistage dynamical system of microbial fed-batch culture. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 835-850. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.835

[14]

Yuting Ding, Jinli Xu, Jun Cao, Dongyan Zhang. Mathematical modeling about nonlinear delayed hydraulic cylinder system and its analysis on dynamical behaviors. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 943-958. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017049

[15]

Lei Wang, Jinlong Yuan, Yingfang Li, Enmin Feng, Zhilong Xiu. Parameter identification of nonlinear delayed dynamical system in microbial fermentation based on biological robustness. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (2) : 103-113. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.103

[16]

Jibin Li, Yi Zhang. On the traveling wave solutions for a nonlinear diffusion-convection equation: Dynamical system approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (3) : 1119-1138. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1119

[17]

Qi Yang, Lei Wang, Enmin Feng, Hongchao Yin, Zhilong Xiu. Identification and robustness analysis of nonlinear hybrid dynamical system of genetic regulation in continuous culture. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 579-599. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018168

[18]

Leong-Kwan Li, Sally Shao, K. F. Cedric Yiu. Nonlinear dynamical system modeling via recurrent neural networks and a weighted state space search algorithm. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (2) : 385-400. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.385

[19]

Xiaoqiang Dai, Wenke Li. Non-global solution for visco-elastic dynamical system with nonlinear source term in control problem. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (6) : 4087-4098. doi: 10.3934/era.2021073

[20]

P.K. Newton. The dipole dynamical system. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 692-699. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.692

 Impact Factor: 

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (24)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]