# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

2007, 2007(Special): 286-293. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.286

## Theoretical optimization of finite difference schemes

 1 Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Institut Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, UMR CNRS 71900, Boîte courrier $n^0$ 162, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, cedex 05. France

Received  September 2006 Revised  March 2007 Published  September 2007

The aim of this work is to develop general optimization methods for linear finite difference schemes used to approximate linear differential equations, on the basis of a matrix equation, which enables to determine the optimal value of a parameter for a given scheme.
Citation: Claire david@lmm.jussieu.fr David, Pierre Sagaut. Theoretical optimization of finite difference schemes. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 286-293. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.286
 [1] Gianluca Frasca-Caccia, Peter E. Hydon. Locally conservative finite difference schemes for the modified KdV equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (2) : 307-323. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019015 [2] Emma Hoarau, Claire david@lmm.jussieu.fr David, Pierre Sagaut, Thiên-Hiêp Lê. Lie group study of finite difference schemes. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 495-505. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.495 [3] Adam M. Oberman. Wide stencil finite difference schemes for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation and functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 10 (1) : 221-238. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.10.221 [4] Bernard Ducomet, Alexander Zlotnik, Ilya Zlotnik. On a family of finite-difference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation. Kinetic and Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 151-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.151 [5] Takeshi Fukao, Shuji Yoshikawa, Saori Wada. Structure-preserving finite difference schemes for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions in the one-dimensional case. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2017, 16 (5) : 1915-1938. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2017093 [6] Roumen Anguelov, Jean M.-S. Lubuma, Meir Shillor. Dynamically consistent nonstandard finite difference schemes for continuous dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 34-43. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.34 [7] Qi Hong, Jialing Wang, Yuezheng Gong. Second-order linear structure-preserving modified finite volume schemes for the regularized long wave equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (12) : 6445-6464. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019146 [8] Thierry Horsin, Peter I. Kogut, Olivier Wilk. Optimal $L^2$-control problem in coefficients for a linear elliptic equation. II. Approximation of solutions and optimality conditions. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2016, 6 (4) : 595-628. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016017 [9] Manuel de León, Juan Carlos Marrero, David Martín de Diego. Linear almost Poisson structures and Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2010, 2 (2) : 159-198. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2010.2.159 [10] Thierry Horsin, Peter I. Kogut. Optimal $L^2$-control problem in coefficients for a linear elliptic equation. I. Existence result. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2015, 5 (1) : 73-96. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.73 [11] Marcel Braukhoff, Ansgar Jüngel. Entropy-dissipating finite-difference schemes for nonlinear fourth-order parabolic equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3335-3355. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020234 [12] Lih-Ing W. Roeger. Dynamically consistent discrete Lotka-Volterra competition models derived from nonstandard finite-difference schemes. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (2) : 415-429. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.415 [13] Houda Hani, Moez Khenissi. Asymptotic behaviors of solutions for finite difference analogue of the Chipot-Weissler equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1421-1445. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016057 [14] Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079 [15] Guy V. Norton, Robert D. Purrington. The Westervelt equation with a causal propagation operator coupled to the bioheat equation.. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2016, 5 (3) : 449-461. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016013 [16] Laurent Gosse. Well-balanced schemes using elementary solutions for linear models of the Boltzmann equation in one space dimension. Kinetic and Related Models, 2012, 5 (2) : 283-323. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.283 [17] Moulay Rchid Sidi Ammi, Ismail Jamiai. Finite difference and Legendre spectral method for a time-fractional diffusion-convection equation for image restoration. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (1) : 103-117. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018007 [18] Xiaozhong Yang, Xinlong Liu. Numerical analysis of two new finite difference methods for time-fractional telegraph equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3921-3942. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020269 [19] Ömer Oruç, Alaattin Esen, Fatih Bulut. A unified finite difference Chebyshev wavelet method for numerically solving time fractional Burgers' equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 533-542. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019035 [20] Tetsuya Ishiwata, Kota Kumazaki. Structure preserving finite difference scheme for the Landau-Lifshitz equation with applied magnetic field. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 644-651. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0644

Impact Factor: