November  2021, 1(4): 225-255. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021016

Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system

1. 

School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, 2522 Wollongong, NSW, Australia; sg908@uowmail.edu.au (S.G.)

2. 

School of the Arts, English and Media, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; byecies@uow.edu.au (B.Y.)

* Correspondence: jshen@uow.edu.au; Tel: +61-2-4221-3873

Academic Editor: Feng-Kuang Chiang

Received  August 2021 Revised  November 2021 Published  November 2021

With the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic and its inevitable consequences in education, increased demand for robust online learning frameworks has occurred at all levels of the education system. Given the transformative power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms, there have been determined attempts through the design and application of intelligent tools to overcome existing challenges in online learning platforms. Accordingly, educational providers and researchers are investigating and developing intelligent online learning environments which share greater commonalities with real-world classroom conditions in order to better meet learners' needs. However, short attention spans and the widespread use of smart devices and social media bring about new e-learning systems known as microlearning (ML). While there has been ample research investigating ML and developing micro-content, pedagogical challenges and a general lack of alternative frameworks, theories and practices still exist. The present models have little to say about the connections between social interaction, including learner–content, learner–instructor and learner–learner communication. This has prompted us to investigate the complementary aspects of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) as an interactive learning model, along with an embedded ML module in the design and development of a comprehensive learning platform. The purpose of this study is to explore the pedagogical frameworks and challenges with reference to interaction and retention in online learning environments, as well as the theoretical and pedagogical foundations of ML and its applications. In addition, we delve into the theories and principles behind CSCL, the main elements in CSCL, identifying the issues and challenges to be faced in improving the efficacy of collaboration processes and outcomes. In short, we aim to synthesize how microlearning and CSCL can be applied as effective modules within a comprehensive online learning platform, thereby offering STEM educators a relevant roadmap towards progress that has yet to be offered in previous studies.

Citation: Soheila Garshasbi, Brian Yecies, Jun Shen. Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system. STEM Education, 2021, 1 (4) : 225-255. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021016
References:
[1] T. Hug, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer, New York, 2012.   Google Scholar
[2]

Buchem, I. and Hamelmann, H., Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development. eLearning Papers, 2010, 21(7): 1-15. Google Scholar

[3]

Nikou, S.A. and Economides, A.A., Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018, 34(3): 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240 doi: 10.1111/jcal.12240.  Google Scholar

[4]

Neelen, M. and Kirschner, P.A., Microlearning-A new old concept to put out to pasture. Retrieved from https://3starlearningexperiences.wordpress.com/2017/06/13/microlearning-a-new-old-concept-to-put-out-to-pasture/ on August 28, 2021. Google Scholar

[5]

Jomah, O., Masoud, A.K., Kishore, X.P. and Aurelia, S., Microlearning: A modernized education system. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2017, 7(1): 103-110. Google Scholar

[6]

Cutler, D., The story behind micro-learning. Retrieved from http://www.spinedu.com/the-story-behind-micro-learning/#.W08KQdUzat_ on August 28, 2021. Google Scholar

[7]

Golonka, E.M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D.L. and Freynik, S., Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2014, 27(1): 70-105. Google Scholar

[8]

Lin, J.J. and Lin, H., Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019, 32(8): 878-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359.  Google Scholar

[9]

Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y. and Huang, Y.M., Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017, 30(3-4): 284-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383.  Google Scholar

[10] R.N. Palloff and K. Pratt, Collaborating online: Learning together in community, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2005.   Google Scholar
[11]

Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J. and Oliver, R., A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2004, 52(4): 53-65. Google Scholar

[12]

Resta, P. and Shonfeld, M., A study of trans-national learning teams in a virtual world, in Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference, R. McBride and M. Searson Ed. 2013, pp. 2932-2940. Google Scholar

[13]

Abedin, B., Sense of community and learning outcomes in computer supported collaborative learning environments. Business and Information, 2012, 9(1): 964-969. Google Scholar

[14] L. Harasim, Learning theory and online technology: How new technologies are transforming learning opportunities, Routledge Press, New York, 2012.   Google Scholar
[15] P. Resta and T. Carroll, Redefining teacher education for digital age learners, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, 2010.   Google Scholar
[16]

Miller, G.A., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956, 63(2): 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 doi: 10.1037/h0043158.  Google Scholar

[17] R.C. Clark and R.E. Mayer, e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, 2011.   Google Scholar
[18] J. SwellerP. Ayres and S. Kalyuga, Cognitive Load Theory, Springer Science, New York, NY, 2011.   Google Scholar
[19]

Hug, T., Mobile learning as 'Microlearning': Conceptual considerations towards enhancements of didactic thinking. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2010, 2(4): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2010100104 doi: 10.4018/jmbl.2010100104.  Google Scholar

[20]

Blaschke, L.M., Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2012, 13(1): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076 doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.  Google Scholar

[21]

Kerres, M., Microlearning as a Challenge for Instructional Design, in Didactics of Microlearning, T. Hug Ed. 2007, pp. 98-109. New York, NY: Waxmann Publishing Co. Google Scholar

[22]

Suhonjić, A.Z., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Labus, A., Bogdanović, Z. and Barać, D., Fostering students' participation in creating educational content through crowdsourcing. Interactive Learning Environments, 2019, 27(1): 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451898 doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1451898.  Google Scholar

[23]

Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E.N. and Carbonara, D., Teachers' knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 48(6): 1414-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12514.  Google Scholar

[24] A.B.R. Shatte and S.J. Teague, Microlearning for improved student outcomes in higher education: A scoping review, OSF Preprints, 2020.  doi: 10.31219/osf.io/fhu8n.  Google Scholar
[25]

Liu, L., Design and analysis of online micro-course of garden architecture design based on CPC model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2017, 12(07): 44-55. Google Scholar

[26]

Erwen, Z. and Wenming, Z., Construction and application of MOOC-based college English micro lesson system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2017, 12(02): 155-165. Google Scholar

[27]

Osaigbovo, I.I. and Iwegim, C.F., Instagram: A niche for microlearning of undergraduate medical microbiology. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 2018, 10(2): 75. Google Scholar

[28]

Dingler, T., Weber, D., Pielot, M., Cooper, J., Chang, C. -C. and Henze, N., Language learning on-the-go: opportune moments and design of mobile microlearning sessions, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2017, pp. 1-12. Google Scholar

[29]

Edge, D., Fitchett, S., Whitney, M. and Landay, J., MemReflex: adaptive flashcards for mobile microlearning, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2012, pp. 431-440. Google Scholar

[30]

Kadhem, H., Using mobile-based micro-learning to enhance students; retention of IT concepts and skills, in 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications (ICKEA 2017), 2017, pp. 128-132. Google Scholar

[31]

Lv, M., Liu, H., Zhou, W. and Zheng, C., Efficiency model of micro-course study based on cognitive psychology in the college. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 107: 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.024.  Google Scholar

[32]

Bothe, M., Renz, J., Rohloff, T. and Meinel, C., From MOOCs to Micro Learning Activities, in 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2019, pp. 280-288. Google Scholar

[33]

Wen, C. and Zhang, J., Design of a Microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2015, 58(3): 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2363627 doi: 10.1109/TE.2014.2363627.  Google Scholar

[34]

Baumgartner, P., Educational Dimensions of Microlearning - Towards a Taxonomy for Microlearning. in Designing MicroLearning Experiences - Building up Knowledge in organisations and companies, M. Roth, P.A. Bruck and M. Sedlaczek Ed. 2013. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. Google Scholar

[35]

Göschlberger, B., A Platform for Social Microlearning, in Adaptive and Adaptable Learning, K. Verbert, M. Sharples and T. Klobučar Ed. 2016, pp. 513-516. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_52 Google Scholar

[36]

Bouillion, L.M. and Gomez, L.M., Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2001, 38(8): 878-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037 doi: 10.1002/tea.1037.  Google Scholar

[37] L.S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.   Google Scholar
[38] L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.   Google Scholar
[39] P. Lévy, L'intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace, La Découverte, Paris, 1994.   Google Scholar
[40] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York, 1980.   Google Scholar
[41]

Jonassen, D.H. and Carr, C.S., Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning, in Computers as Cognitive Tools, Volume Two: No More Walls. Theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes, S.P. Lajoie Ed. 2000, pp. 165-196. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar

[42]

Khong, H.K. and Kabilan, M.K., A theoretical model of micro-learning for second language instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1818786 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1818786.  Google Scholar

[43]

Sweller, J., Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, 68: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3 doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.  Google Scholar

[44]

Mayer, R.E., Cognitive theory of multimedia learning, in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, R.E. Mayer Ed. 2014, pp. 43-71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[45] R.M. Ryan and E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2017.   Google Scholar
[46]

Hug, T. and Friesen, N., Outline of a microlearning agenda. eLearning Papers, 2009, 1-13. Google Scholar

[47]

Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84(2): 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.  Google Scholar

[48]

Cates, S., Barron, D. and Ruddiman, P., MobiLearn Go: Mobile microlearning as an active, location-aware game, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2017, pp. 1-7. Google Scholar

[49]

Sun, G., Cui, T., Yong, J., Shen, J. and Chen, S., Drawing micro learning into MOOC: Using fragmented pieces of time to enable effective entire course learning experiences, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2015, pp. 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2015.7230977. Google Scholar

[50]

Sun, G., Cui, T., Yong, J., Shen, J. and Chen, S., MLaaS: A cloud-based system for delivering adaptive micro learning in mobile MOOC learning. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2018, 11(2): 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2015.2473854 doi: 10.1109/TSC.2015.2473854.  Google Scholar

[51]

Cai, W. and Chen, Q., An experimental research of augmented reality technology from the perspective of mobile learning, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2018, pp. 912-915. Google Scholar

[52]

Trusty, A. and Truong, K.N., Augmenting the web for second language vocabulary learning, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 3179-3188. Google Scholar

[53]

Göschlberger, B., Social Microlearning Motivates Learners to Pursue Higher-Level Cognitive Objectives, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference, eLEOT 2016, G. Vincenti, A. Bucciero, M. Helfert and M. Glowatz Ed. 2017, pp. 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49625-2_24 Google Scholar

[54]

Rodríguez, A.I., Riaza, B.G. and Gómez, M.C., Collaborative learning and mobile devices: An educational experience in Primary Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 72: 664-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019.  Google Scholar

[55]

Chi, M.T.H. and Wylie, R., The ICAP Framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 2014, 49(4): 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.  Google Scholar

[56]

Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C., Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, in Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R.K. Sawyer Ed. 2006, pp. 97-115. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[57]

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W. and Buuren, H.V., Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 2007, 49(2): 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004.  Google Scholar

[58]

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D., Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective, in Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R.K. Sawyer Ed. 2006, pp. 409-426. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[59]

Resta, P. and Laferrière, T., Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 2007, 19: 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7 doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7.  Google Scholar

[60]

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W., Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 2001, 15(1): 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071.  Google Scholar

[61] D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, Allyn & Bacon., Boston, 1999.   Google Scholar
[62]

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W., Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19(3): 335-353. Google Scholar

[63]

Lan, Y. -J., Sung, Y. -T. and Chang, K. -E., From particular to popular: Facilitating EFL mobile-supported cooperative reading. Language learning & technology, 2013, 17(3): 23-38. Google Scholar

[64] R.A. AlexanderF.C. Hardman and J. Hardman, Changing Talk, Changing Thinking: Interim report from the in-house evaluation of the CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching project, University of York and Cambridge Primary Review Trust., York, UK, 2017.   Google Scholar
[65]

Tsuei, M., Development of a peer-assisted learning strategy in computer-supported collaborative learning environments for elementary school students. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 2011, 42(2): 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01006.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01006.x.  Google Scholar

[66]

Genlott, A.A. and Grönlund, Å., Closing the gaps - Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration. Computers and education, 2016, 99: 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004.  Google Scholar

[67]

Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M., A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 2002, 34: 457-469. Google Scholar

[68] J. Piaget, La construction du réel chez l'enfant, Delachaux & Niestlé., Paris, 1977.   Google Scholar
[69] E. Von Glasersfeld, Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning, The Falmer Press., London, 1995.   Google Scholar
[70]

Savin-Baden, M., Challenging models and perspectives of problem-based learning, in Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering, E.D. Graaff and A. Kolmos Ed. 2007, pp. 9-29. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Google Scholar

[71]

Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P.A. and Tsai, C. -C., The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2018, 88(6): 799-843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584 doi: 10.3102/0034654318791584.  Google Scholar

[72]

Workman, M., Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive styles make a difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 2004, 20: 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.003.  Google Scholar

[73]

Ke, F., Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3: 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2 doi: 10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.  Google Scholar

[74]

Moreno, R., Constructing knowledge with an agent-based instructional program: A comparison of cooperative and individual meaning making. Learning and Instruction, 2009, 19(5): 433-444. Google Scholar

[75]

Kwon, S.Y. and Cifuentes, L., The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 2009, 52(2): 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012.  Google Scholar

[76]

Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Sangin, M. and Dillenbourg, P., Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 2010, 38: 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6 doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6.  Google Scholar

[77]

Frailich, M., Kesner, M. and Hofstein, A., Enhancing students' understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST), 2009, 46(3): 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20278 doi: 10.1002/tea.20278.  Google Scholar

[78]

Roseth, C.J., Saltarelli, A.J. and Glass, C.R., Effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy on social interdependence, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011, 103(4), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024213 doi: 10.1037/a0024213.  Google Scholar

[79]

Hwang, W. -Y. and Hu, Sh. -Sh., Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 2013, 62: 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005.  Google Scholar

[80]

Mercier, E.M. and Higgins, S.E., Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 2013, 25: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004.  Google Scholar

[81]

Hsieh, Y. -H. and Tsai, C. -C., The effect of moderator's facilitative strategies on online synchronous discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(5): 1708-1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.010 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.010.  Google Scholar

[82]

Michinov, N. and Primois, C., Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(1): 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004.  Google Scholar

[83]

Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and Barrows, H.S., Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cognition and instruction, 2008, 26(1): 48-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495 doi: 10.1080/07370000701798495.  Google Scholar

[84]

Liu, C.H. and Matthews, R., Vygotsky's philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 2005, 6(3): 386-399. Google Scholar

[85]

Araujo, L., Knowing and learning as networking. Management Learning, 1998, 29(3): 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698293004 doi: 10.1177/1350507698293004.  Google Scholar

[86]

Bell, F., Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2011, 12(3): 98-118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902 doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902.  Google Scholar

[87] L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.   Google Scholar
[88] E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.   Google Scholar
[89] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press., New York, 1998.   Google Scholar
[90]

Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Kirschner F. and Zambrano J., From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y.  Google Scholar

[91]

Sweller, J. and Cooper, G.A., The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 1985, 2(1): 59-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3 doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.  Google Scholar

[92]

Asterhan, C.S.C. and Schwarz, B.B., Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 2016, 51(2): 164-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458.  Google Scholar

[93]

Foote, N., Matson, E., Weiss, L. and Wenger, E., Leveraging group knowledge for high-performance decision-making. Organizational Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 280-295. Google Scholar

[94]

Janssen, J. and Bodemer, D., Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 2013, 48(1): 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.749153 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.749153.  Google Scholar

[95]

Desjardins, F.J., Lacasse, R., Bélair, L.M., Toward a definition of four orders of competency for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education, in Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference, 2001, pp. 213-217. Google Scholar

[96]

Zhao, H., Sullivan, K.P.H. and Mellenius, I., Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 45(5): 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12094 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12094.  Google Scholar

[97]

Whiteside, A.L., Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2015, 19(2): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V19I2.453 doi: 10.24059/OLJ.V19I2.453.  Google Scholar

[98]

Rajaram, S., Collaboration both hurts and helps memory: A cognitive perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011, 20(2): 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411403251 doi: 10.1177/0963721411403251.  Google Scholar

[99]

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P. and Sweller, J., Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2018, 32(6): 681-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3444 doi: 10.1002/acp.3444.  Google Scholar

[100]

Greene, J.A., Muis, K.R. and Pieschl, S., The role of epistemic beliefs in students' self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 2010, 45(4): 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515932 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515932.  Google Scholar

[101]

Xie, K., Miller, N.C. and Allison, J.R., Toward a social conflict evolution model: Examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 2013, 63: 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003.  Google Scholar

[102]

Xie, K., Yu, C. and Bradshaw, A.C., Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 2014, 20: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003.  Google Scholar

[103]

Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C. and Paris, A.H., School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74(1): 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.  Google Scholar

[104]

Fredricks, J.A., Wang, M. -T., Linn, J.S., Hofkens, T.L., Sung, H., Parr, A. and Allerton, J., Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 43: 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009.  Google Scholar

[105] J.W. Pellegrino and M.L. Hilton, Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century, The National Academic Press., Washington, DC, 2013.   Google Scholar
[106]

Khawaja, M.A., Chen, F. and Marcus, N., Analysis of collaborative communication for linguistic cues of cognitive load. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2009, 54(4): 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811431258 doi: 10.1177/0018720811431258.  Google Scholar

[107]

Yin, B. and Chen, F., Towards automatic cognitive load measurement from speech analysis, in Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, J.A. Jacko Ed. 2007, pp. 1011-1020. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar

[108]

Paas, F.G.W. C, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(4): 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429.  Google Scholar

[109]

Larmuseau, C., Vanneste, P., Cornelis, J., Desmet, P. and Depaepe, F., Combining physiological data and subjective measurements to investigate cognitive load during complex learning. Frontline Learning Research, 2019, 7(2): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i2.403 doi: 10.14786/flr.v7i2.403.  Google Scholar

[110]

Pijeira-Diáz, H.J., Drachsler, H., Kirschner, P.A. and Järvelä, S., Profiling sympathetic arousal in a physics course: How active are students? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018, 34(4): 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12271 doi: 10.1111/jcal.12271.  Google Scholar

[111]

Paas, F.G.W. C and Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 1994, 6: 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420 doi: 10.1007/BF02213420.  Google Scholar

[112]

Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., Van Amelsvoort, M. and Quignard, M., Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007, 2(2-3): 315-357. Google Scholar

[113]

Weinberger, A. and Fischer, F., A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 2006, 46(1): 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.  Google Scholar

[114]

Ruiz, J.G., Mintzer, M.J. and Leipzig, R.M., The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 2006, 81(3): 207-212. Google Scholar

[115]

Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P.A. and Järvenoja, H., Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning - A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 68: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.  Google Scholar

[116]

Järvenoja, H., Näykki, P. and Törmänen, T., Emotional regulation in collaborative learning: When do higher education students activate group level regulation in the face of challenges? Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 44(10), 1747-1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665318 doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1665318.  Google Scholar

[117]

Hadwin, A.F., Järvelä, S. and Miller, M., Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments, in Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance, D.H. Schunk and J.A. Greene Eds. 2018, pp. 83-106. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

[118]

Järvenoja, H. and Järvelä, S., Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, 79(3): 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811 doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811.  Google Scholar

[119]

Zhang, Z., Liu, T. and Lee, C.B., Language learners' enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 2021, 98: 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478 doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102478.  Google Scholar

[120]

Mänty, K., Järvenoja, H. and Törmänen, T., Socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Combining individual emotional experiences and group-level emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 2020, 102: 101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589.  Google Scholar

[121]

Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J. and Koivuniemi, M., Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 42: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006.  Google Scholar

[122]

Su, Y., Li, Y., Hu, H. and Rose, C.P., Exploring college English language learners' self and social regulation of learning during wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9269-y doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9269-y.  Google Scholar

[123]

Cho, M. -H., Kim, Y. and Choi, D.H., The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2017, 34: 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001.  Google Scholar

[124]

Kilis, S., Yıldırım, Z., Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 2018, 126: 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032.  Google Scholar

[125]

Albaili, M.A., Differences among low-, average- and high-achieving college students on learning and study strategies. Educational Psychology, 1997, 17(1-2): 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170112 doi: 10.1080/0144341970170112.  Google Scholar

[126]

Muis, K.R., The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 2007, 42(3): 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416306 doi: 10.1080/00461520701416306.  Google Scholar

[127]

Credé, M. and Phillips, L.A., A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011, 21(4): 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002.  Google Scholar

[128]

Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang J. -C. and Tsai C. -C., Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners' attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019, 32(5-6): 556-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363.  Google Scholar

[129]

Duncan, T.G. and McKeachie, W.J., The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 2005, 40(2): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6 doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.  Google Scholar

[130]

Cao, L., Differences in procrastination and motivation between undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2012, 12(2): 39-64. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v12i2.2018 doi: 10.14434/josotl.v12i2.2018.  Google Scholar

[131]

Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P. and Järvelä, S., Convergences of joint, positive interactions and regulation in collaborative learning. Small Group Research, 2020, 51(2): 229-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419867760 doi: 10.1177/1046496419867760.  Google Scholar

[132]

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H. and Malmberg, J., Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological Progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2019, 14: 425-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2 doi: 10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2.  Google Scholar

[133]

Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. and Järvenoja, H., Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2017, 49: 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009.  Google Scholar

[134]

Janssen, J., Erkens, G. and Kirschner, P.A., Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(3): 1046-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002.  Google Scholar

[135]

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P.A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M. and Järvenoja, H., Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2015, 63: 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1 doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.  Google Scholar

[136]

Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J. -C. and Tsai, C. -C., Examining the relationship between English learners' online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, 34(3): 105-121. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3548 doi: 10.14742/ajet.3548.  Google Scholar

[137]

Lee, S.W. -Y. and Tsai, C. -C., Students' perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(2): 905-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016.  Google Scholar

[138]

Zheng, C., Liang, J. -C., Yang, Y.F. and Tsai, C. -C., The relationship between Chinese university students' conceptions of language learning and their online self-regulation. System, 2016, 57: 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.01.005 doi: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.01.005.  Google Scholar

[139]

Ucan, S. and Webb, M., Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37(15): 2503-2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634 doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634.  Google Scholar

[140]

Janssen, J. and Kirschner, P.A., Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, 68: 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5 doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5.  Google Scholar

[141]

Tomai, M., Mebane, M.E., Rosa, V., Ingravalle, V. and Benedetti, M., Do virtual groups experience less conflict than traditional teams? AWER Procedia Information Technology & Computer Science, 2013, 4: 926-938. Google Scholar

[142]

Wiedmann, M., Leach, R.C., Rummel, N. and Wiley, J., Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science, 2012, 40: 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y.  Google Scholar

[143]

Postmes, T. and Spears, R., Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28(8): 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811006 doi: 10.1177/01461672022811006.  Google Scholar

[144]

Van der Meijden, H. and Veenman, S., Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(5): 831-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.005.  Google Scholar

[145]

Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M., Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb, in Knowledge Creation in Education, S.C. Tan, H.J. So and J. Yeo Eds. 2014, pp. 35-52. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-047-6_3 Google Scholar

[146]

Garshasbi, S., Mohammadi, Y., Garf, S., Garshasbi, S. and Shen, J., Optimal learning group formation: A multi-objective heuristic search strategy for enhancing inter-group homogeneity and intra-group heterogeneity. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 118: 506-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.034 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.034.  Google Scholar

[147]

Li, M. and Campbell, J., Asian students' perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 2008, 19(3): 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802078525 doi: 10.1080/14675980802078525.  Google Scholar

[148]

Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A. and Paas, F., Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 2010, 22: 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x.  Google Scholar

[149]

Bertucci, A., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Conte, S., Effect of task and goal interdependence on achievement, cooperation, and support among elementary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 2016, 79: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.011.  Google Scholar

[150]

Nebel, S., Schneider, S., Beege, M., Kolda, F., Mackiewicz, V. and Rey, G.D., You cannot do this alone! Increasing task interdependence in cooperative educational videogames to encourage collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2017, 65: 993-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9511-8 doi: 10.1007/s11423-017-9511-8.  Google Scholar

[151]

Lin, J. -W., Mai, L. -J. and Lai, Y. -C., Peer interaction and social network analysis of online communities with the support of awareness of different contexts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2015, 10: 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9212-4 doi: 10.1007/s11412-015-9212-4.  Google Scholar

[152]

Bause, I.M., Brich, I.R., Wesslein, A. -K. and Hesse, F.W., Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4 doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4.  Google Scholar

[153]

Tsai, C. -W., How to involve students in an online course: A redesigned online pedagogy of collaborative learning and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2013, 11(3): 47-57. Google Scholar

[154]

Xiao, Y. and Lucking, R., The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 2008, 11(3-4): 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.  Google Scholar

[155]

Dillenbourg, P. and Hong, F., The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3: 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1 doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1.  Google Scholar

[156]

Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. and Fischer, F., Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(4): 506-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007.  Google Scholar

[157]

Cheng, B., Wang, M. and Mercer, N., Effects of role assignment in concept mapping mediated small group learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2014, 23: 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.001.  Google Scholar

[158]

Su, A.Y.S., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, W. -Y. and Zhang, J., A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 2010, 55(2): 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008.  Google Scholar

[159]

Hsiao, H. -S., Chang, C. -S., Lin, C. -Y., Chang, C. -C. and Chen, J. -C., The influence of collaborative learning games within different devices on student's learning performance and behaviours. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 30(6): 652-669. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.347 doi: 10.14742/ajet.347.  Google Scholar

[160]

Zeman, E., What's driving Apple's 10 billion app success. Retrieved on August 25, 2021 from https://www.informationweek.com/mobile-devices/what-s-driving-apple-s-10-billion-app-success Google Scholar

[161]

Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M., A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2004, 20(4): 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x.  Google Scholar

[162]

Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M., Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 2004, 42: 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005.  Google Scholar

[163]

Viberg, O. and Grönlund, Å, Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 2013, 69: 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014.  Google Scholar

[164]

Lai, C. -Y. and Wu, C. -C., Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2006, 22(4): 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00176.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00176.x.  Google Scholar

[165]

Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M. and Claro, S., Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students' mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2009, 58: 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9 doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9.  Google Scholar

[166]

Liu, C. -C., Tao, S. -Y. and Nee, J. -N., Bridging the gap between students and computers: Supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2008, 27(2): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601054772 doi: 10.1080/01449290601054772.  Google Scholar

[167]

Liu, T. -Y., Tan, T. -H. and Chu, Y. -L., Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 2009, 12(4): 161-175. Google Scholar

[168]

Wong, L. -H. and Hsu, C. -K., Effects of learning styles on learners' collaborative patterns in a mobile-assisted, Chinese character-forming game based on a flexible grouping approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2016, 25(1): 61-77. Google Scholar

[169]

Fu, Q. -K. and Hwang, G. -j., Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 2018, 119: 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004.  Google Scholar

[170]

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K., The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 2007, 19: 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8 doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8.  Google Scholar

[171]

Lee, D., Huh, Y. and Reigeluth, C.M., Collaboration, intragroup conflict, and social skills in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 2015, 43: 561-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7 doi: 10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7.  Google Scholar

[172]

Shimazoe, J. and Aldrich, H., Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 2010, 58(2): 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903418594 doi: 10.1080/87567550903418594.  Google Scholar

[173]

Freeman, L. and Greenacre, L., An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 2010, 33(1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310389150 doi: 10.1177/0273475310389150.  Google Scholar

[174]

Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A. and Noroozi, O., Multicultural student group work in higher education: An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2012, 36(2): 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004.  Google Scholar

[175]

Bunderson, J.S. and Reagans, R.E., Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1182-1194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0590 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0590.  Google Scholar

[176]

Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A. and Kanselaar, G., Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, 25(1): 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010.  Google Scholar

[177]

Galton, M., Hargreaves, L. and Pell, T., Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2009, 39(1): 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701994 doi: 10.1080/03057640802701994.  Google Scholar

[178]

Koutrouba, K., Kariotaki, M. and Christopoulos, I., Secondary education students' preferences regarding their participation in group work: The case of Greece. Improving Schools, 2012, 15(3): 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480212458862 doi: 10.1177/1365480212458862.  Google Scholar

[179]

Chang, Y. and Brickman, P., When group work doesn't work: Insights from students. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 2018, 17(3): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199 doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199.  Google Scholar

[180]

Slof, B., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J. and Kirschner, P.A., Mine, ours, and yours: Whose engagement and prior knowledge affects individual achievement from online collaborative learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021, 37(1): 39-50. https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/jcal.12466 Google Scholar

[181]

Gillies, R.M. and Boyle, M., Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2010, 26(4): 933-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034.  Google Scholar

[182]

van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J., Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21(1): 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004.  Google Scholar

[183]

van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G. and Brekelmans, M., Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(4): 1377-1386. Google Scholar

[184]

Webb, N.M., The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, 79(1): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772 doi: 10.1348/000709908X380772.  Google Scholar

[185]

Chiriac, E.H. and Granström, K., Teachers' leadership and students' experience of group work. Teachers and Teaching, 2012, 18(3): 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629842 doi: 10.1080/13540602.2012.629842.  Google Scholar

[186]

Strom, P.S. and Strom, R.D., Teamwork skills assessment for cooperative learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2011, 17(4): 233-251. Google Scholar

[187]

Biasutti, M., Flow and Optimal Experience, in Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, J.P. Stein Ed. 2017, pp. 1-9. New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar

[188]

Biasutti, M. and Frate, S., A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environmental Education Research, 2017, 23(2): 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660 doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660.  Google Scholar

[189]

Zion, M., Adler, I. and Mevarech, Z., The effect of individual and social metacognitive support on students' metacognitive performances in an online discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2015, 52(1): 50-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633114568855 doi: 10.1177/0735633114568855.  Google Scholar

[190]

Semingson, P., Crosslin, M. and Dellinger, J., Microlearning as a tool to engage students in online and blended learning, in Proceedings of SITE 2015 - Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, D. Rutledge and D. Slykhuis Ed. 2015, pp. 474-479. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Las Vegas, NV, United States. Google Scholar

[191]

Sauter, M., Uttal, D.H., Rapp, D.N., Downing, M. and Jona, K., Getting real: The authenticity of remote labs and simulations for science learning. Distance education, 2013, 34(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770431 doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.770431.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1] T. Hug, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer, New York, 2012.   Google Scholar
[2]

Buchem, I. and Hamelmann, H., Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development. eLearning Papers, 2010, 21(7): 1-15. Google Scholar

[3]

Nikou, S.A. and Economides, A.A., Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018, 34(3): 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240 doi: 10.1111/jcal.12240.  Google Scholar

[4]

Neelen, M. and Kirschner, P.A., Microlearning-A new old concept to put out to pasture. Retrieved from https://3starlearningexperiences.wordpress.com/2017/06/13/microlearning-a-new-old-concept-to-put-out-to-pasture/ on August 28, 2021. Google Scholar

[5]

Jomah, O., Masoud, A.K., Kishore, X.P. and Aurelia, S., Microlearning: A modernized education system. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2017, 7(1): 103-110. Google Scholar

[6]

Cutler, D., The story behind micro-learning. Retrieved from http://www.spinedu.com/the-story-behind-micro-learning/#.W08KQdUzat_ on August 28, 2021. Google Scholar

[7]

Golonka, E.M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D.L. and Freynik, S., Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2014, 27(1): 70-105. Google Scholar

[8]

Lin, J.J. and Lin, H., Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019, 32(8): 878-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359.  Google Scholar

[9]

Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y. and Huang, Y.M., Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017, 30(3-4): 284-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383.  Google Scholar

[10] R.N. Palloff and K. Pratt, Collaborating online: Learning together in community, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2005.   Google Scholar
[11]

Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J. and Oliver, R., A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2004, 52(4): 53-65. Google Scholar

[12]

Resta, P. and Shonfeld, M., A study of trans-national learning teams in a virtual world, in Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference, R. McBride and M. Searson Ed. 2013, pp. 2932-2940. Google Scholar

[13]

Abedin, B., Sense of community and learning outcomes in computer supported collaborative learning environments. Business and Information, 2012, 9(1): 964-969. Google Scholar

[14] L. Harasim, Learning theory and online technology: How new technologies are transforming learning opportunities, Routledge Press, New York, 2012.   Google Scholar
[15] P. Resta and T. Carroll, Redefining teacher education for digital age learners, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, 2010.   Google Scholar
[16]

Miller, G.A., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956, 63(2): 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158 doi: 10.1037/h0043158.  Google Scholar

[17] R.C. Clark and R.E. Mayer, e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, 2011.   Google Scholar
[18] J. SwellerP. Ayres and S. Kalyuga, Cognitive Load Theory, Springer Science, New York, NY, 2011.   Google Scholar
[19]

Hug, T., Mobile learning as 'Microlearning': Conceptual considerations towards enhancements of didactic thinking. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2010, 2(4): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2010100104 doi: 10.4018/jmbl.2010100104.  Google Scholar

[20]

Blaschke, L.M., Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2012, 13(1): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076 doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.  Google Scholar

[21]

Kerres, M., Microlearning as a Challenge for Instructional Design, in Didactics of Microlearning, T. Hug Ed. 2007, pp. 98-109. New York, NY: Waxmann Publishing Co. Google Scholar

[22]

Suhonjić, A.Z., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Labus, A., Bogdanović, Z. and Barać, D., Fostering students' participation in creating educational content through crowdsourcing. Interactive Learning Environments, 2019, 27(1): 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451898 doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1451898.  Google Scholar

[23]

Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E.N. and Carbonara, D., Teachers' knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 48(6): 1414-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12514.  Google Scholar

[24] A.B.R. Shatte and S.J. Teague, Microlearning for improved student outcomes in higher education: A scoping review, OSF Preprints, 2020.  doi: 10.31219/osf.io/fhu8n.  Google Scholar
[25]

Liu, L., Design and analysis of online micro-course of garden architecture design based on CPC model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2017, 12(07): 44-55. Google Scholar

[26]

Erwen, Z. and Wenming, Z., Construction and application of MOOC-based college English micro lesson system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2017, 12(02): 155-165. Google Scholar

[27]

Osaigbovo, I.I. and Iwegim, C.F., Instagram: A niche for microlearning of undergraduate medical microbiology. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 2018, 10(2): 75. Google Scholar

[28]

Dingler, T., Weber, D., Pielot, M., Cooper, J., Chang, C. -C. and Henze, N., Language learning on-the-go: opportune moments and design of mobile microlearning sessions, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2017, pp. 1-12. Google Scholar

[29]

Edge, D., Fitchett, S., Whitney, M. and Landay, J., MemReflex: adaptive flashcards for mobile microlearning, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2012, pp. 431-440. Google Scholar

[30]

Kadhem, H., Using mobile-based micro-learning to enhance students; retention of IT concepts and skills, in 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications (ICKEA 2017), 2017, pp. 128-132. Google Scholar

[31]

Lv, M., Liu, H., Zhou, W. and Zheng, C., Efficiency model of micro-course study based on cognitive psychology in the college. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 107: 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.024 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.024.  Google Scholar

[32]

Bothe, M., Renz, J., Rohloff, T. and Meinel, C., From MOOCs to Micro Learning Activities, in 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2019, pp. 280-288. Google Scholar

[33]

Wen, C. and Zhang, J., Design of a Microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2015, 58(3): 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2363627 doi: 10.1109/TE.2014.2363627.  Google Scholar

[34]

Baumgartner, P., Educational Dimensions of Microlearning - Towards a Taxonomy for Microlearning. in Designing MicroLearning Experiences - Building up Knowledge in organisations and companies, M. Roth, P.A. Bruck and M. Sedlaczek Ed. 2013. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. Google Scholar

[35]

Göschlberger, B., A Platform for Social Microlearning, in Adaptive and Adaptable Learning, K. Verbert, M. Sharples and T. Klobučar Ed. 2016, pp. 513-516. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_52 Google Scholar

[36]

Bouillion, L.M. and Gomez, L.M., Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2001, 38(8): 878-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037 doi: 10.1002/tea.1037.  Google Scholar

[37] L.S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.   Google Scholar
[38] L.S. Vygotsky, Thought and language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.   Google Scholar
[39] P. Lévy, L'intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberspace, La Découverte, Paris, 1994.   Google Scholar
[40] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York, 1980.   Google Scholar
[41]

Jonassen, D.H. and Carr, C.S., Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning, in Computers as Cognitive Tools, Volume Two: No More Walls. Theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes, S.P. Lajoie Ed. 2000, pp. 165-196. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar

[42]

Khong, H.K. and Kabilan, M.K., A theoretical model of micro-learning for second language instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1818786 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1818786.  Google Scholar

[43]

Sweller, J., Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, 68: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3 doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.  Google Scholar

[44]

Mayer, R.E., Cognitive theory of multimedia learning, in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, R.E. Mayer Ed. 2014, pp. 43-71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[45] R.M. Ryan and E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2017.   Google Scholar
[46]

Hug, T. and Friesen, N., Outline of a microlearning agenda. eLearning Papers, 2009, 1-13. Google Scholar

[47]

Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84(2): 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.  Google Scholar

[48]

Cates, S., Barron, D. and Ruddiman, P., MobiLearn Go: Mobile microlearning as an active, location-aware game, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2017, pp. 1-7. Google Scholar

[49]

Sun, G., Cui, T., Yong, J., Shen, J. and Chen, S., Drawing micro learning into MOOC: Using fragmented pieces of time to enable effective entire course learning experiences, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 2015, pp. 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2015.7230977. Google Scholar

[50]

Sun, G., Cui, T., Yong, J., Shen, J. and Chen, S., MLaaS: A cloud-based system for delivering adaptive micro learning in mobile MOOC learning. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2018, 11(2): 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2015.2473854 doi: 10.1109/TSC.2015.2473854.  Google Scholar

[51]

Cai, W. and Chen, Q., An experimental research of augmented reality technology from the perspective of mobile learning, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2018, pp. 912-915. Google Scholar

[52]

Trusty, A. and Truong, K.N., Augmenting the web for second language vocabulary learning, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 3179-3188. Google Scholar

[53]

Göschlberger, B., Social Microlearning Motivates Learners to Pursue Higher-Level Cognitive Objectives, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference, eLEOT 2016, G. Vincenti, A. Bucciero, M. Helfert and M. Glowatz Ed. 2017, pp. 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49625-2_24 Google Scholar

[54]

Rodríguez, A.I., Riaza, B.G. and Gómez, M.C., Collaborative learning and mobile devices: An educational experience in Primary Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 72: 664-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.019.  Google Scholar

[55]

Chi, M.T.H. and Wylie, R., The ICAP Framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 2014, 49(4): 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.  Google Scholar

[56]

Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C., Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, in Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R.K. Sawyer Ed. 2006, pp. 97-115. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[57]

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W. and Buuren, H.V., Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 2007, 49(2): 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004.  Google Scholar

[58]

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D., Computer-supported collaborative learning: A historical perspective, in Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R.K. Sawyer Ed. 2006, pp. 409-426. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

[59]

Resta, P. and Laferrière, T., Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 2007, 19: 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7 doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7.  Google Scholar

[60]

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W., Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 2001, 15(1): 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071.  Google Scholar

[61] D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, Allyn & Bacon., Boston, 1999.   Google Scholar
[62]

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W., Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19(3): 335-353. Google Scholar

[63]

Lan, Y. -J., Sung, Y. -T. and Chang, K. -E., From particular to popular: Facilitating EFL mobile-supported cooperative reading. Language learning & technology, 2013, 17(3): 23-38. Google Scholar

[64] R.A. AlexanderF.C. Hardman and J. Hardman, Changing Talk, Changing Thinking: Interim report from the in-house evaluation of the CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching project, University of York and Cambridge Primary Review Trust., York, UK, 2017.   Google Scholar
[65]

Tsuei, M., Development of a peer-assisted learning strategy in computer-supported collaborative learning environments for elementary school students. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 2011, 42(2): 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01006.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01006.x.  Google Scholar

[66]

Genlott, A.A. and Grönlund, Å., Closing the gaps - Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration. Computers and education, 2016, 99: 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004.  Google Scholar

[67]

Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M., A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 2002, 34: 457-469. Google Scholar

[68] J. Piaget, La construction du réel chez l'enfant, Delachaux & Niestlé., Paris, 1977.   Google Scholar
[69] E. Von Glasersfeld, Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning, The Falmer Press., London, 1995.   Google Scholar
[70]

Savin-Baden, M., Challenging models and perspectives of problem-based learning, in Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering, E.D. Graaff and A. Kolmos Ed. 2007, pp. 9-29. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Google Scholar

[71]

Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P.A. and Tsai, C. -C., The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 2018, 88(6): 799-843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584 doi: 10.3102/0034654318791584.  Google Scholar

[72]

Workman, M., Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive styles make a difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 2004, 20: 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.003.  Google Scholar

[73]

Ke, F., Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3: 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2 doi: 10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.  Google Scholar

[74]

Moreno, R., Constructing knowledge with an agent-based instructional program: A comparison of cooperative and individual meaning making. Learning and Instruction, 2009, 19(5): 433-444. Google Scholar

[75]

Kwon, S.Y. and Cifuentes, L., The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 2009, 52(2): 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.012.  Google Scholar

[76]

Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Sangin, M. and Dillenbourg, P., Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 2010, 38: 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6 doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6.  Google Scholar

[77]

Frailich, M., Kesner, M. and Hofstein, A., Enhancing students' understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST), 2009, 46(3): 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20278 doi: 10.1002/tea.20278.  Google Scholar

[78]

Roseth, C.J., Saltarelli, A.J. and Glass, C.R., Effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy on social interdependence, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011, 103(4), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024213 doi: 10.1037/a0024213.  Google Scholar

[79]

Hwang, W. -Y. and Hu, Sh. -Sh., Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 2013, 62: 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005.  Google Scholar

[80]

Mercier, E.M. and Higgins, S.E., Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 2013, 25: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004.  Google Scholar

[81]

Hsieh, Y. -H. and Tsai, C. -C., The effect of moderator's facilitative strategies on online synchronous discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(5): 1708-1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.010 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.010.  Google Scholar

[82]

Michinov, N. and Primois, C., Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(1): 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004.  Google Scholar

[83]

Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and Barrows, H.S., Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building. Cognition and instruction, 2008, 26(1): 48-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495 doi: 10.1080/07370000701798495.  Google Scholar

[84]

Liu, C.H. and Matthews, R., Vygotsky's philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 2005, 6(3): 386-399. Google Scholar

[85]

Araujo, L., Knowing and learning as networking. Management Learning, 1998, 29(3): 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698293004 doi: 10.1177/1350507698293004.  Google Scholar

[86]

Bell, F., Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2011, 12(3): 98-118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902 doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902.  Google Scholar

[87] L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.   Google Scholar
[88] E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.   Google Scholar
[89] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press., New York, 1998.   Google Scholar
[90]

Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Kirschner F. and Zambrano J., From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y.  Google Scholar

[91]

Sweller, J. and Cooper, G.A., The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 1985, 2(1): 59-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3 doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.  Google Scholar

[92]

Asterhan, C.S.C. and Schwarz, B.B., Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 2016, 51(2): 164-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458.  Google Scholar

[93]

Foote, N., Matson, E., Weiss, L. and Wenger, E., Leveraging group knowledge for high-performance decision-making. Organizational Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 280-295. Google Scholar

[94]

Janssen, J. and Bodemer, D., Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 2013, 48(1): 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.749153 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.749153.  Google Scholar

[95]

Desjardins, F.J., Lacasse, R., Bélair, L.M., Toward a definition of four orders of competency for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education, in Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference, 2001, pp. 213-217. Google Scholar

[96]

Zhao, H., Sullivan, K.P.H. and Mellenius, I., Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 45(5): 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12094 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12094.  Google Scholar

[97]

Whiteside, A.L., Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2015, 19(2): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V19I2.453 doi: 10.24059/OLJ.V19I2.453.  Google Scholar

[98]

Rajaram, S., Collaboration both hurts and helps memory: A cognitive perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011, 20(2): 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411403251 doi: 10.1177/0963721411403251.  Google Scholar

[99]

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P. and Sweller, J., Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2018, 32(6): 681-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3444 doi: 10.1002/acp.3444.  Google Scholar

[100]

Greene, J.A., Muis, K.R. and Pieschl, S., The role of epistemic beliefs in students' self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 2010, 45(4): 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515932 doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515932.  Google Scholar

[101]

Xie, K., Miller, N.C. and Allison, J.R., Toward a social conflict evolution model: Examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 2013, 63: 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003.  Google Scholar

[102]

Xie, K., Yu, C. and Bradshaw, A.C., Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 2014, 20: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003.  Google Scholar

[103]

Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C. and Paris, A.H., School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74(1): 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.  Google Scholar

[104]

Fredricks, J.A., Wang, M. -T., Linn, J.S., Hofkens, T.L., Sung, H., Parr, A. and Allerton, J., Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 43: 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009.  Google Scholar

[105] J.W. Pellegrino and M.L. Hilton, Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century, The National Academic Press., Washington, DC, 2013.   Google Scholar
[106]

Khawaja, M.A., Chen, F. and Marcus, N., Analysis of collaborative communication for linguistic cues of cognitive load. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2009, 54(4): 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811431258 doi: 10.1177/0018720811431258.  Google Scholar

[107]

Yin, B. and Chen, F., Towards automatic cognitive load measurement from speech analysis, in Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, J.A. Jacko Ed. 2007, pp. 1011-1020. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar

[108]

Paas, F.G.W. C, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(4): 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429.  Google Scholar

[109]

Larmuseau, C., Vanneste, P., Cornelis, J., Desmet, P. and Depaepe, F., Combining physiological data and subjective measurements to investigate cognitive load during complex learning. Frontline Learning Research, 2019, 7(2): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i2.403 doi: 10.14786/flr.v7i2.403.  Google Scholar

[110]

Pijeira-Diáz, H.J., Drachsler, H., Kirschner, P.A. and Järvelä, S., Profiling sympathetic arousal in a physics course: How active are students? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018, 34(4): 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12271 doi: 10.1111/jcal.12271.  Google Scholar

[111]

Paas, F.G.W. C and Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 1994, 6: 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420 doi: 10.1007/BF02213420.  Google Scholar

[112]

Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., Van Amelsvoort, M. and Quignard, M., Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007, 2(2-3): 315-357. Google Scholar

[113]

Weinberger, A. and Fischer, F., A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 2006, 46(1): 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.  Google Scholar

[114]

Ruiz, J.G., Mintzer, M.J. and Leipzig, R.M., The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 2006, 81(3): 207-212. Google Scholar

[115]

Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P.A. and Järvenoja, H., Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning - A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 2014, 68: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.  Google Scholar

[116]

Järvenoja, H., Näykki, P. and Törmänen, T., Emotional regulation in collaborative learning: When do higher education students activate group level regulation in the face of challenges? Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 44(10), 1747-1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665318 doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1665318.  Google Scholar

[117]

Hadwin, A.F., Järvelä, S. and Miller, M., Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments, in Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performance, D.H. Schunk and J.A. Greene Eds. 2018, pp. 83-106. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

[118]

Järvenoja, H. and Järvelä, S., Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, 79(3): 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811 doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811.  Google Scholar

[119]

Zhang, Z., Liu, T. and Lee, C.B., Language learners' enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 2021, 98: 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478 doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102478.  Google Scholar

[120]

Mänty, K., Järvenoja, H. and Törmänen, T., Socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Combining individual emotional experiences and group-level emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 2020, 102: 101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589.  Google Scholar

[121]

Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J. and Koivuniemi, M., Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 42: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006.  Google Scholar

[122]

Su, Y., Li, Y., Hu, H. and Rose, C.P., Exploring college English language learners' self and social regulation of learning during wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9269-y doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9269-y.  Google Scholar

[123]

Cho, M. -H., Kim, Y. and Choi, D.H., The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2017, 34: 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001.  Google Scholar

[124]

Kilis, S., Yıldırım, Z., Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 2018, 126: 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032.  Google Scholar

[125]

Albaili, M.A., Differences among low-, average- and high-achieving college students on learning and study strategies. Educational Psychology, 1997, 17(1-2): 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170112 doi: 10.1080/0144341970170112.  Google Scholar

[126]

Muis, K.R., The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 2007, 42(3): 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701416306 doi: 10.1080/00461520701416306.  Google Scholar

[127]

Credé, M. and Phillips, L.A., A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011, 21(4): 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002.  Google Scholar

[128]

Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang J. -C. and Tsai C. -C., Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners' attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2019, 32(5-6): 556-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363 doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363.  Google Scholar

[129]

Duncan, T.G. and McKeachie, W.J., The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 2005, 40(2): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6 doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.  Google Scholar

[130]

Cao, L., Differences in procrastination and motivation between undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2012, 12(2): 39-64. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v12i2.2018 doi: 10.14434/josotl.v12i2.2018.  Google Scholar

[131]

Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P. and Järvelä, S., Convergences of joint, positive interactions and regulation in collaborative learning. Small Group Research, 2020, 51(2): 229-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419867760 doi: 10.1177/1046496419867760.  Google Scholar

[132]

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H. and Malmberg, J., Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological Progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2019, 14: 425-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2 doi: 10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2.  Google Scholar

[133]

Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. and Järvenoja, H., Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2017, 49: 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009.  Google Scholar

[134]

Janssen, J., Erkens, G. and Kirschner, P.A., Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(3): 1046-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002.  Google Scholar

[135]

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P.A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M. and Järvenoja, H., Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2015, 63: 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1 doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.  Google Scholar

[136]

Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J. -C. and Tsai, C. -C., Examining the relationship between English learners' online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, 34(3): 105-121. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3548 doi: 10.14742/ajet.3548.  Google Scholar

[137]

Lee, S.W. -Y. and Tsai, C. -C., Students' perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(2): 905-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016.  Google Scholar

[138]

Zheng, C., Liang, J. -C., Yang, Y.F. and Tsai, C. -C., The relationship between Chinese university students' conceptions of language learning and their online self-regulation. System, 2016, 57: 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.01.005 doi: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.01.005.  Google Scholar

[139]

Ucan, S. and Webb, M., Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 2015, 37(15): 2503-2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634 doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634.  Google Scholar

[140]

Janssen, J. and Kirschner, P.A., Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, 68: 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5 doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5.  Google Scholar

[141]

Tomai, M., Mebane, M.E., Rosa, V., Ingravalle, V. and Benedetti, M., Do virtual groups experience less conflict than traditional teams? AWER Procedia Information Technology & Computer Science, 2013, 4: 926-938. Google Scholar

[142]

Wiedmann, M., Leach, R.C., Rummel, N. and Wiley, J., Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science, 2012, 40: 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y.  Google Scholar

[143]

Postmes, T. and Spears, R., Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28(8): 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811006 doi: 10.1177/01461672022811006.  Google Scholar

[144]

Van der Meijden, H. and Veenman, S., Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21(5): 831-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.005.  Google Scholar

[145]

Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M., Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb, in Knowledge Creation in Education, S.C. Tan, H.J. So and J. Yeo Eds. 2014, pp. 35-52. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-047-6_3 Google Scholar

[146]

Garshasbi, S., Mohammadi, Y., Garf, S., Garshasbi, S. and Shen, J., Optimal learning group formation: A multi-objective heuristic search strategy for enhancing inter-group homogeneity and intra-group heterogeneity. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 118: 506-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.034 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.034.  Google Scholar

[147]

Li, M. and Campbell, J., Asian students' perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 2008, 19(3): 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802078525 doi: 10.1080/14675980802078525.  Google Scholar

[148]

Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A. and Paas, F., Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 2010, 22: 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x.  Google Scholar

[149]

Bertucci, A., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Conte, S., Effect of task and goal interdependence on achievement, cooperation, and support among elementary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 2016, 79: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.011.  Google Scholar

[150]

Nebel, S., Schneider, S., Beege, M., Kolda, F., Mackiewicz, V. and Rey, G.D., You cannot do this alone! Increasing task interdependence in cooperative educational videogames to encourage collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2017, 65: 993-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9511-8 doi: 10.1007/s11423-017-9511-8.  Google Scholar

[151]

Lin, J. -W., Mai, L. -J. and Lai, Y. -C., Peer interaction and social network analysis of online communities with the support of awareness of different contexts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2015, 10: 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9212-4 doi: 10.1007/s11412-015-9212-4.  Google Scholar

[152]

Bause, I.M., Brich, I.R., Wesslein, A. -K. and Hesse, F.W., Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2018, 13: 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4 doi: 10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4.  Google Scholar

[153]

Tsai, C. -W., How to involve students in an online course: A redesigned online pedagogy of collaborative learning and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2013, 11(3): 47-57. Google Scholar

[154]

Xiao, Y. and Lucking, R., The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 2008, 11(3-4): 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.  Google Scholar

[155]

Dillenbourg, P. and Hong, F., The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3: 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1 doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1.  Google Scholar

[156]

Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. and Fischer, F., Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(4): 506-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007.  Google Scholar

[157]

Cheng, B., Wang, M. and Mercer, N., Effects of role assignment in concept mapping mediated small group learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 2014, 23: 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.001.  Google Scholar

[158]

Su, A.Y.S., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, W. -Y. and Zhang, J., A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 2010, 55(2): 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008.  Google Scholar

[159]

Hsiao, H. -S., Chang, C. -S., Lin, C. -Y., Chang, C. -C. and Chen, J. -C., The influence of collaborative learning games within different devices on student's learning performance and behaviours. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 30(6): 652-669. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.347 doi: 10.14742/ajet.347.  Google Scholar

[160]

Zeman, E., What's driving Apple's 10 billion app success. Retrieved on August 25, 2021 from https://www.informationweek.com/mobile-devices/what-s-driving-apple-s-10-billion-app-success Google Scholar

[161]

Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M., A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2004, 20(4): 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x.  Google Scholar

[162]

Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M., Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 2004, 42: 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005.  Google Scholar

[163]

Viberg, O. and Grönlund, Å, Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 2013, 69: 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014.  Google Scholar

[164]

Lai, C. -Y. and Wu, C. -C., Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2006, 22(4): 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00176.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00176.x.  Google Scholar

[165]

Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M. and Claro, S., Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students' mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2009, 58: 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9 doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9.  Google Scholar

[166]

Liu, C. -C., Tao, S. -Y. and Nee, J. -N., Bridging the gap between students and computers: Supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2008, 27(2): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601054772 doi: 10.1080/01449290601054772.  Google Scholar

[167]

Liu, T. -Y., Tan, T. -H. and Chu, Y. -L., Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 2009, 12(4): 161-175. Google Scholar

[168]

Wong, L. -H. and Hsu, C. -K., Effects of learning styles on learners' collaborative patterns in a mobile-assisted, Chinese character-forming game based on a flexible grouping approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2016, 25(1): 61-77. Google Scholar

[169]

Fu, Q. -K. and Hwang, G. -j., Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 2018, 119: 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004.  Google Scholar

[170]

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K., The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 2007, 19: 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8 doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8.  Google Scholar

[171]

Lee, D., Huh, Y. and Reigeluth, C.M., Collaboration, intragroup conflict, and social skills in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 2015, 43: 561-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7 doi: 10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7.  Google Scholar

[172]

Shimazoe, J. and Aldrich, H., Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 2010, 58(2): 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903418594 doi: 10.1080/87567550903418594.  Google Scholar

[173]

Freeman, L. and Greenacre, L., An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 2010, 33(1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310389150 doi: 10.1177/0273475310389150.  Google Scholar

[174]

Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A. and Noroozi, O., Multicultural student group work in higher education: An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2012, 36(2): 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004.  Google Scholar

[175]

Bunderson, J.S. and Reagans, R.E., Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1182-1194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0590 doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0590.  Google Scholar

[176]

Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A. and Kanselaar, G., Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, 25(1): 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010.  Google Scholar

[177]

Galton, M., Hargreaves, L. and Pell, T., Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2009, 39(1): 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701994 doi: 10.1080/03057640802701994.  Google Scholar

[178]

Koutrouba, K., Kariotaki, M. and Christopoulos, I., Secondary education students' preferences regarding their participation in group work: The case of Greece. Improving Schools, 2012, 15(3): 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480212458862 doi: 10.1177/1365480212458862.  Google Scholar

[179]

Chang, Y. and Brickman, P., When group work doesn't work: Insights from students. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 2018, 17(3): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199 doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199.  Google Scholar

[180]

Slof, B., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J. and Kirschner, P.A., Mine, ours, and yours: Whose engagement and prior knowledge affects individual achievement from online collaborative learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021, 37(1): 39-50. https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/jcal.12466 Google Scholar

[181]

Gillies, R.M. and Boyle, M., Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2010, 26(4): 933-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034.  Google Scholar

[182]

van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J., Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21(1): 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004.  Google Scholar

[183]

van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G. and Brekelmans, M., Teacher interventions in a synchronous, co-located CSCL setting: Analyzing focus, means, and temporality. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(4): 1377-1386. Google Scholar

[184]

Webb, N.M., The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, 79(1): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772 doi: 10.1348/000709908X380772.  Google Scholar

[185]

Chiriac, E.H. and Granström, K., Teachers' leadership and students' experience of group work. Teachers and Teaching, 2012, 18(3): 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629842 doi: 10.1080/13540602.2012.629842.  Google Scholar

[186]

Strom, P.S. and Strom, R.D., Teamwork skills assessment for cooperative learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2011, 17(4): 233-251. Google Scholar

[187]

Biasutti, M., Flow and Optimal Experience, in Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, J.P. Stein Ed. 2017, pp. 1-9. New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar

[188]

Biasutti, M. and Frate, S., A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environmental Education Research, 2017, 23(2): 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660 doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660.  Google Scholar

[189]

Zion, M., Adler, I. and Mevarech, Z., The effect of individual and social metacognitive support on students' metacognitive performances in an online discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2015, 52(1): 50-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633114568855 doi: 10.1177/0735633114568855.  Google Scholar

[190]

Semingson, P., Crosslin, M. and Dellinger, J., Microlearning as a tool to engage students in online and blended learning, in Proceedings of SITE 2015 - Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, D. Rutledge and D. Slykhuis Ed. 2015, pp. 474-479. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Las Vegas, NV, United States. Google Scholar

[191]

Sauter, M., Uttal, D.H., Rapp, D.N., Downing, M. and Jona, K., Getting real: The authenticity of remote labs and simulations for science learning. Distance education, 2013, 34(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770431 doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.770431.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Main elements of CSCL
Figure 2.  Antecedents in CSCL
[1]

Nicolás M. Crisosto, Christopher M. Kribs-Zaleta, Carlos Castillo-Chávez, Stephen Wirkus. Community resilience in collaborative learning. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (1) : 17-40. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.17

[2]

Ning Zhang, Qiang Wu. Online learning for supervised dimension reduction. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2019, 2 (2) : 95-106. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2019008

[3]

Shuhua Wang, Zhenlong Chen, Baohuai Sheng. Convergence of online pairwise regression learning with quadratic loss. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4023-4054. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020178

[4]

Aude Hofleitner, Tarek Rabbani, Mohammad Rafiee, Laurent El Ghaoui, Alex Bayen. Learning and estimation applications of an online homotopy algorithm for a generalization of the LASSO. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2014, 7 (3) : 503-523. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.503

[5]

Roberto C. Alamino, Nestor Caticha. Bayesian online algorithms for learning in discrete hidden Markov models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (1) : 1-10. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.1

[6]

Marc Bocquet, Alban Farchi, Quentin Malartic. Online learning of both state and dynamics using ensemble Kalman filters. Foundations of Data Science, 2021, 3 (3) : 305-330. doi: 10.3934/fods.2020015

[7]

Ran Ma, Lu Zhang, Yuzhong Zhang. A best possible algorithm for an online scheduling problem with position-based learning effect. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021144

[8]

Yudong Li, Yonggang Li, Bei Sun, Yu Chen. Zinc ore supplier evaluation and recommendation method based on nonlinear adaptive online transfer learning. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021193

[9]

Alan Beggs. Learning in monotone bayesian games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2015, 2 (2) : 117-140. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2015.2.117

[10]

Yangyang Xu, Wotao Yin, Stanley Osher. Learning circulant sensing kernels. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2014, 8 (3) : 901-923. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2014.8.901

[11]

Christian Soize, Roger Ghanem. Probabilistic learning on manifolds. Foundations of Data Science, 2020, 2 (3) : 279-307. doi: 10.3934/fods.2020013

[12]

Mauro Maggioni, James M. Murphy. Learning by active nonlinear diffusion. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (3) : 271-291. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019012

[13]

Gernot Holler, Karl Kunisch. Learning nonlocal regularization operators. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021003

[14]

Minlong Lin, Ke Tang. Selective further learning of hybrid ensemble for class imbalanced increment learning. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (1) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017005

[15]

Ziju Shen, Yufei Wang, Dufan Wu, Xu Yang, Bin Dong. Learning to scan: A deep reinforcement learning approach for personalized scanning in CT imaging. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021045

[16]

Prashant Shekhar, Abani Patra. Hierarchical approximations for data reduction and learning at multiple scales. Foundations of Data Science, 2020, 2 (2) : 123-154. doi: 10.3934/fods.2020008

[17]

Mikhail Langovoy, Akhilesh Gotmare, Martin Jaggi. Unsupervised robust nonparametric learning of hidden community properties. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2019, 2 (2) : 127-147. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2019010

[18]

Émilie Chouzenoux, Henri Gérard, Jean-Christophe Pesquet. General risk measures for robust machine learning. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (3) : 249-269. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019011

[19]

Yang Wang, Zhengfang Zhou. Source extraction in audio via background learning. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 283-290. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.283

[20]

Wei Xue, Wensheng Zhang, Gaohang Yu. Least absolute deviations learning of multiple tasks. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 719-729. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017071

 Impact Factor: 

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]